Operational Art In Comparison With Case Study

The Thai and American cultures differ greatly. Communications and the success of operations will be much facilitated with the help of translators and regional experts to facilitate communications and mutual understanding. According to The U.S.A. Joint Publication 3-0, such capabilities can even save lives during combat situations. (2)

For the situation in Thailand, the priority is ground force reinforcements and fires. These can however not be deployed properly without the necessary language and intelligence capabilities. It is therefore suggested that language and intelligence capabilities be deployed first. On this basis, intelligence can then be gathered regarding the existing capabilities on both sides, while communications can be established with local military leaders.

Once this is complete, the next step is to deploy reinforcements to increase the ground force troop numbers. Language capabilities by means of translators and regional experts should be installed in sufficient numbers to ensure optimal ground operations.

The third step is to deploy fire capabilities for the ground forces. This can be done by reorganizing existing weapons and transport, as well as reinforcing the amount of fire power among the ground forces. Furthermore, a communications network should be established among the various ground forces that protect Thailand. Currently, these forces work in isolation. A higher quality of communication network will provide a basis for more integrated and more effective operations.

The communication network can also be extended to include air support for the ground forces. Neither Myanmar nor Thailand are optimizing their air support operations. A better communication network, along with funding for aircraft upgrades, will significantly improve Thailand's strategic advantage.

Finally, Thailand's Naval capabilities must be upgraded by means of funding and the deployment of personnel. Here also, communication, networking...

...

Time is therefore of the essence, which could mean that the necessary deployments may not be properly integrated before the necessity of combat. This risk can be mitigated by proper initial communication among high-level commanders, and ensuring the proper installation of sufficient language capabilities to create a culture of trust among U.S. And Thai forces. This will ensure that no misunderstandings occur during deployment or operations.
(3)

The command and control structure will operate on the basis of a COCOM structure, which is the command authority as vested in commanders of combatant commands (U.S.A. Joint Publication 3-0, 2008: III-5). This structure will include commanders from the highest levels of both United States and Thailand's forces. At this level, language capabilities should also be installed to ensure that no misunderstandings occur when commands are passed via the communication network. This structure generally concerns logistical, administration, and disciplinary matters.

The COCOM structure will be supplemented by OPCON, which can be delegated to and exercised by subordinate Joint Force Commanders and Service commanders in order to ensure the success of the mission. It is a more practical structure and is delegated within the military forces as necessary. Finally, TACON will be integrated once language capabilities are installed across the entire operation. This structure is exercised by functional component commanders and operates across the forces involved. In conclusion, it is vital to provide an integrated and unified force for Thailand to optimize its defense against Myanmar.

Sources

U.S.A. Joint Publication 3-0. 2008. Joint Operations.

The United States Naval War College. 2008. Service Capabilities Vignettes for North Africa and Thailand.

Sources Used in Documents:

Sources

U.S.A. Joint Publication 3-0. 2008. Joint Operations.

The United States Naval War College. 2008. Service Capabilities Vignettes for North Africa and Thailand.


Cite this Document:

"Operational Art In Comparison With" (2010, April 05) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/operational-art-in-comparison-with-1362

"Operational Art In Comparison With" 05 April 2010. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/operational-art-in-comparison-with-1362>

"Operational Art In Comparison With", 05 April 2010, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/operational-art-in-comparison-with-1362

Related Documents

Operational Design & Art Operational Design is a methodological approach used by U.S. military command personnel to make it possible for officers and soldiers to know how to be creative in their use of combat and confrontational tools and tactics. It's a learning, assessment and re-learning structure that allows for space for Operational Art in the command structure, or the freedom to use creativity grounded in understanding and experience (Joint Operation

It is now early September 1942. You are a staff officer with the Combined Chiefs of Staff, European Theater of Operations. As a recent CGSOC graduate, your supervisor has tasked you to review the Norfolk Group's plan and related documents (Parts 2 and 3). The Combined Chiefs will meet soon to be briefed on the planning thus far to advise President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill on the status of

Selection is based on the uniqueness and irreducible message portrayed by each particular art. In addition, the art determines operational functions and effects exclusive in it. Through this self-explanation of the art, the latter defines a concrete area of competence and sense of possession. According to modernistic paintings, today's phase of art carries with it the representation of principle objects. Similarly, the recognizable elements in the art are depicted to

Organizational Climate Compare and Contrast organizational (command) climate with organizational culture. Organizational climate is the recurring patterns of behavior, attitudes and feelings that characterize life in an organization or company. It is used to describe the dimensions of the environment at work. The factors that determine organizational climate are leadership, organizational structure, historical forces, standards of accountability, standards of behavior, communication, rewards, trust, commitment, vision and strategies, and organizational correctiveness. Leadership is a

Rank Second Semester Exam Compare and contrast organizational climate with organizational command. Understanding organizational theory is critical as it facilitates both improved leadership and greater unit cohesiveness and morale. Two key concepts in organizational theory are that of organizational climate and command structure. Climate can be understood as the elements which play into unit motivation and how it affects unit productivity. To offer a definition, climate is a set of behaviors shared

Paiget and Vygotsky Compare and Contrast Piagets and Vygotsky Understanding is assumed to be the process which is involved when it comes to mental activity and thinking, for instance memory, problem solving and attention. In this paper which is basically on the cognitive development it will explore things by comparing and contrasting the theories of Piaget and Vygotsky, both of whom were very influential in coming up with a more scientific