Organizational culture, collectivism, and employee responsibility in Stohr and Finkelstein

Organization Culture: An Analysis of Two Articles

Organizational Culture: An Analysis of Two articles

A collective organization approach is one that seeks to empower individual capacity to handle organizational issues at an individual level. In this case, the spirit of independence is vital since it responds to organizational challenges, and thus, maintaining spillovers cooperatively. Based on this approach, it is appropriate to assess the scholarly approach designated to empower organizational culture. Scholarly, such a culture ideally seeks to minimize derivative concerns that are resulted by an improperly dispensed leadership ideology. This analysis will seek to examine the validity of two articles and their interrelationship in terms of concepts. The analysis will prove that an appropriate organization culture is one that fosters a spirit of collectivism.

Summary of the two articles

Stohr et al. (2012) approach towards organizational culture is structurally developed towards affiliating all members in a given organization setting. As seen, it is appropriate to understand that organization culture is a complex application of working formulas, norms, symbols, systems and visions. As a form of emphasis, Stohr et al. (2012) applied two focal paradigms, which are instrumental in dividing the human world into two central theories. Indeed, the theories being championed by the team seeks to communicate on the greater role of the top management in illuminating to the required management setting. The instrument applied by the team seeks to analyze the influence of a coherent organizational theory in public administration, psychology and the larger business setting. The team is inspired so that all the employees in the organization are motivated (Stohr et al., 2012, p. 322). Therefore, there is a need to engage all employees in the progressing process.

Finkelstein (2011) seconds the notion of management leading service orientation. Similarly, Stohr et al. (202) are heavily in the opinion for proper organization culture where the citizenship is decisive in providing a seconding commitment towards improving staff service orientation. They argue that employee activities exceed the formal job requirements and will naturally contribute to the executive functioning of the organization. They not only power the concept of individualism in the organization, but also champion the application of collectivism as a seconding theory in relation to organizational citizenship.

Conclusion

Developing an appropriate organization culture is integral in responding to absences of management. Indeed, this analysis has clarified that a desirable organizational culture is one that seeks to foster a spirit of collective responsibility. Besides, future research should be directed towards examining on the possibility of deriving management an aggregate moral relativism as this will seek to absorb all employees in an equal organizational management theory. In encapsulation, organizational theory is vital since it directly responds to management issues of the 21st Century.