Patient Autonomy Pain Relief Case Study

PAGES
2
WORDS
690
Cite

Johnson & Potter’s (n.d.) case study “Walking the Tightrope” demonstrates how different ethical obligations like patient autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence often conflict during delivery of care. Pain management is especially difficult, given the problematic side effects and potential for abuse of some pain management interventions. The patient in the case in question has been described as a “complainer,” but there is no indication of dementia (Johnson & Potter, n.d.). Therefore, there should be no reason to allow the family members to continue in their overbearing manner preventing the patient from making her own decisions regarding pain relief. The case illustrates the doctor, the sister, and the brother making decisions on the patient’s behalf, clearly impinging on her autonomy. The disparate voices are also pulling in opposite directions, leading to a piecemeal and haphazard approach to pain management that could cause further complications and even medication errors. This would also open the healthcare institution for possible malpractice suits, given the level of experimentation being done with interventions like Nalfron causing the patient distress. It would be most helpful in this case to create a healthcare team that can make evidence-based decisions, albeit with some input from...

...

In this case, the nurse has a moral responsibility to serve in an advocacy role, mediating between the needs of the patient for pain relief, and the equally important needs for providing relief that does not interfere with her health prognosis. The nurse might learn that from the patient’s perspective, being “doped up” is a far better alternative to being in constant pain or experiencing adverse reactions to other types of pain management interventions. There is also a moral obligation to offer the patient additional non-pharmacological interventions ranging from mindfulness meditation to supervised long walks outdoors.
Healthcare workers in this case are in a difficult position because they will be expected to ascribe to different ethical frameworks and professional obligations at the same time. As Maumus (2015) points out, too, “the physician is in the precarious position of needing to make decisions in the best interest of the patient while receiving pressure from system administrators to reduce lengths of stay or clinic visit time,” (p. 124). If the patient had been abusing prescription opioids, then the healthcare workers do need to find a feasible solution to pain management that precludes narcotics. As Smebye, Kirkevold & Engedal (2016) also point…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Johnson, L. & Potter, R. (n.d.). Walking the tightrope. Center for Practical Bioethics. http://practicalbioethics.org/case-studies-walking-the-tightrope

Maumus, M. (2015). Bioethics in practice. The Ochsner Journal 15(2): 124-126.

Smebye, K.L., Kirkevold, M. & Engedal, K. (2016). Ethical dilemmas concerning autonomy when persons with dementia wish to live at home: a qualitative, hermeneutic study. BMC Health Services Research 16(2016): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717656/

Textbook.



Cite this Document:

"Patient Autonomy Pain Relief" (2017, December 09) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/patient-autonomy-pain-relief-2166803

"Patient Autonomy Pain Relief" 09 December 2017. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/patient-autonomy-pain-relief-2166803>

"Patient Autonomy Pain Relief", 09 December 2017, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/patient-autonomy-pain-relief-2166803

Related Documents

The Dax Cowart CaseAs a physician, I would say that it is essential to prioritize the autonomy and dignity of the patient. It is also important to respect the patient\\\'s wishes and goals for their medical care.If Dax expressed his wish to refuse further medical treatment and to be allowed to die, as a physician, I would first attempt to understand his reasons and provide him with support, empathy, and

Pain Management: Ethical Issues Pain Management The most ethical way to approach the pain management. Explanation. It is acceptable as long as the patient understands the risks Successful pain relief, particularly during patients' end-of-life (EOL) phase, is a key ethical duty based on the values of patient autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and, chiefly, the double effect concept. Pain management's practical groundwork starts with comprehensive evaluation, which integrates "WILDA" (i.e., Words, Intensity of pain, Location, Duration,

Nurses and Pain Management Pain management has always been a critical goal of health care workers. Strategies for improved pain management guidelines have been in place since the early 1990s, with the aim of allowing clinicians to improve pain management. However, research shows that patients in all age groups continue to experience needless pain, despite the guidelines and treatment availabilities. This paper examines the pain management strategies that could be employed by

Morality of Assisted Suicide Assisted suicide for terminally ill patients may be one of the most morally complex issues facing today's society, with a particular impact on modern healthcare workers. Modern medicine has progressed to a point where, in many instances, life can be prolonged for significant periods of time, well beyond when people would have died of terminal diseases in prior times. However, there have not been similar advances

Freedom and Moral Responsibility in Hospice and Palliative Services The different ethical theories Decision making within the medical field and provision of palliative services is influenced by three ethical theories. The theories are respect for autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Respect for autonomy asserts that a patient should be allowed the option of decision making. This principle will value the patient's intrinsic worth as an individual allowing them to make a decision that

Euthanasia: "Should physicians be allowed to assist in patient suicide?" (No) Euthanasia is, quite literally, a "life and death" issue. It is no surprise, therefore, that it evokes heated debate among doctors, lawyers, philosophers, academicians as well as the general public all over the world. Although, recent developments in modern medicine have given it a new dimension, euthanasia is by no means an exclusively modern-day concern. Even the ancient Greeks had