Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
("Contemporary Trends in Corporate Design," 2001)
Pepsi's second era of expansion in the 1970's transpired when domestic markets at its corporate home base had become stagnant. Foreign markets were growing much faster than domestic markets and thus a source of greater volume of sales. It wished to maneuver itself ahead of its rival Coca-Cola by dominating the world, if it could not immediately dominate the domestic, American market. Globalization then and now allows one to take advantage of legal system, taxes, quotas, tariffs and all kind of governmental barriers, and make investments for profits and immediate sales. However, contrary to traditional trends, Pepsi did not wish to follow domestic customers that go abroad, make use of an oligopolistic or monopolistic position of the company nor a bandwagon effect, given that these tended to be more along the lines of Coke's dominance, as Coke was the more famous brand in America. Pepsi attempted to obtain monopolistic dominance of all international markets by establishing exclusive licensing agreements, such as when it entered the emerging Slavic...
It again, as it had in the 1930s, became vertically integrated, control suppliers, distributors, and all other stages pertaining to the product.
What has remained at the core of both its international and domestic appeal is the centrality of Pepsi's advertising, as it remains "Generation Next," rather than a Classic, despite the fact that the company is almost as old as coke. Through dominating chains of distribution, the company and all of its products, cola and non-cola alike, continues to move aggressively into supermarkets, vending machines, and into overseas markets, with little signs of stopping in its market maneuvering in the future. ("Pepsi-Cola," The Soda Museum)
Works Cited
Company Information." (2005) Pepsi World. Retrieved 28 Jul 2005 at http://www.pepsi.com/help/company_info/index.php
Contemporary Trends in Corporate Design." (6 Dec 2001) Retrieved 28 Jul 2005 at http://www.unc.edu/~nielsen/soci110/nm13/nm13.htm
Pepsi." (2005) The Soda Museum. Retrieved 28 Jul 2005 at http://www.sodamuseum.bigstep.com/generic.jhtml?pid=3
Works Cited
Company Information." (2005) Pepsi World. Retrieved 28 Jul 2005 at http://www.pepsi.com/help/company_info/index.php
Contemporary Trends in Corporate Design." (6 Dec 2001) Retrieved 28 Jul 2005 at http://www.unc.edu/~nielsen/soci110/nm13/nm13.htm
Pepsi." (2005) The Soda Museum. Retrieved 28 Jul 2005 at http://www.sodamuseum.bigstep.com/generic.jhtml?pid=3
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010 Harvard Business Case 9-711-462 Five Forces in the cola industry: Porter's Five Forces Framework Power of buyers For concentrate owners: Strong. The power of buyers is extremely strong within the soda industry, given that consumers can quickly shift their alliance from one beverage to another. Also, cola is not strictly a 'necessity' as a product -- no one needs to drink soda, and consumers can easily
Cola Wars Threat of Entry of New Competition: Low. The economy of scale within the CSD industry requires enormous amount of capitol to enter into this market, making this threat relatively insignificant. - Threat of Substitutes: High. Colas are now part of many different selections of drinks. Health and medical experts also contribute to this theat. -Threat of Customer Buying Power: Medium. It appears the customer base will buy soft drinks with expendable cash, but harsh
Cola Wars: Case Write-Up For many decades, the market for cola could be easily summed up as follows: Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi-Cola. Although Coke clearly dominated, Pepsi was a strong 'also ran,' particularly after branding itself as the taste of the Next Generation. However, in the 1990s, the palates of American consumers began to change, resulting in a sharp leveling off, and then a decline in soda consumption. The major soft drink
Increasing their product lines with good products will increase their sales around the world. The biggest threat that Coca-Cola faces is the intense competition that exists within the industry. Coca-Cola has three main competitors, these being: PepsiCo, Cadbury Schweppes, and the Cott Corporation. All of these companies have products that compete with Coca-Cola products around the world. The competition between Coca-Cola and Pepsi has dominated the industry for more than
Fallout A section of commentators have taken issue with the manner in which the federal government denied suspected terrorist the due process of law as stipulated under the constitution. The government even commissioned the establishment of a torture chamber in Guantanamo Bay. This amounts to gross violation of human rights and civil liberties. There is another clause in the patriot act dubbed "enhanced surveillance procedures," which allows federal authorities to gather
Instead, the Cola Wars helped the industry grow. In 2000, for example, 41% of total non-alcoholic beverages sold were CSDs. In the late 1990s and into the 21st century, the drinks with high growth (and media hype) were non-carbonated juices, sports drinks, tea drinks, dairy drinks, and bottled water. Pepsi dominated this market with Gatorade, Lipton and Aquafina. The bottlers were also required to reinvest in more complex equipment