Essay Doctorate 1,423 words

Performance Improvement Analysis Coaching Is a Skill,

Last reviewed: November 24, 2013 ~8 min read
Abstract

Employee motivation is always determined by their level of motivation. This study has shown how managers of any organization can play the role of a coach with the aim of ensuring that employees perform their roles optimally. Being a coach requires the highest qualities of integrity, detachment, and empathy, coupled with the willingness to embrace fundamentally diverse approaches in the workforce.

Performance Improvement Analysis

Coaching is a skill, which people who manage or teach others realize the best and possible potential. There is a growing need for people to better their skills. This need is subject to grow in the future business world. Coaching can be defined as a tool, which managers can use in various different situations such as delegating, planning, and problem solving. Coaching provides the manager with a different perspective of persons. This is a more optimistic way than people are accustomed to doing. Not all managers can be great coaches from the start of their career. Just like any other new skill, it will take time and practice before it flows in a natural manner. Coaching appears to be simple for a few managers while for some it is not. However, the manager finds his own strategy to succeed as a coach to his followers with due practice. There is no single approach to successful coaching.

Coaching is an art and a skill that requires plenty of practice and a depth of understanding for one to demonstrate his/her full potential. Unlike the one-minute manager, business has no quick fixes to coaching. Time and practice are essential for success in coaching. Therefore, coaching refers to training, tutoring and giving hints to deliver results in vast measures via supportive ties between the coach and the subject by styles and means of communication (Silverman & Cober, 2005).

The first involves looking at the manager as a coach. Regularly, the manager has found himself struggling and fighting to get a job done. The business favors saving time over learning and quality. This made it hard for the manager to find time to coach, which made him feel that it would be easy to dictate. However, dictating has been categorized under the four traditional styles of management, which must be avoided by the coach.

The manager has pursued different traditional management approaches, which have made it difficult for him to become a coach. These styles include persuasion, dictation, abdication, and debating. Because this manager dictates, he tends to be in control of everything and the performer has no much choice. His persuasion has often left the performer wondering if he has any choice. As seen from their debating approach, the employee and the manager felt that they were involved at a slow pace. The abdication style made the worker feel obliged or dumped. The manager has positioned himself in all of these extremes, but coaching tends to be in a different category all together. It integrates the advantages from styles and risks (Houldsworth & Jirasinghe, 2010). When the manager coaches, subordinate will become aware of each element of the job and the required actions that enable him to imagine the success and decide to take responsibility. In return, the manager will listen to himself and understand what is happening, and will understand the action plan and offer support instead of threatening subordinates. Coaching neither deters the manager from absolute control of a situation nor make the subordinates take full responsibility. On the contrary, it will raise responsibility and awareness among the two.

For coaching to be effective, the manager should be seen as a support and not as a threat to his workers. The partnership must be built on safety, minimal pressure, and trust on both ends. This will enable the manager to become a successful coach with practice and time because not all managers are able to begin coaching immediately. Being a coach requires the highest qualities of integrity, detachment, and empathy, coupled with the willingness to embrace fundamentally diverse approaches in the workforce (Silverman & Cober, 2005).

Some reasons including technology, competition, culture, and demographic changes are forcing for more flexible and efficient response of businesses and managers. Staying abreast with the culture change requires one to be aware of competition while delivering the highest level of performance. The manager used to tell subordinates what he wants to be done, but now it will shift to people demanding and wanting to be treated differently. When the manager treats his subordinates differently and gives them want they want, it creates a promise of higher performance. The manager must have awareness and increase responsibility among his subordinates. As a manager, he must capitalize on this, giving people responsibility and in return giving their best shot at tasks.

Silverman and Cober (2005), state that the first key element of coaching is AWARENESS. Awareness can be defined as the product of focused concentration, attention, and clarity. It is not just hearing and seeing in the place of work but also entails the collection and clear perception of the relevant information and facts and the ability to identify what is relevant (Wilson, 2007). The manager as a coach must be aware of himself before he can shift his awareness to his subordinates and the situation at hand. This will enable him realize his achievements through feedback from subordinates (coaches).

The manager must always set the goal of coaching. This must include setting the achievements of a session in the long-term and short-term. After setting the goal, he must put a reality check. This involves exploring the current situation and keeping in mind all that is happening. The manager must reinforce options and alternative strategies for the action plan. The manager must outline the action plan with what will be done and who will do what. It is important for the coach to own the goals (Houldsworth & Jirasinghe, 2010). When a coach manager passes a goal to a worker, he/she denies the subordinate the ownership of the goal. To be a successful coach, the manager must always find a way to have the subordinate come up with his own goals. This will help the subordinate own up to the goal and decide how he will achieve the job responsibility.

Management by Coaching

Generates

Awareness

Responsibility

Quality & quantity of input personal choice & control

Q&Q

recall interest uniqueness self-esteem ownership

Ofof output

Enjoyment

Potential

Learning

Confidence

Performance

Self-motivation

Higher productivity

Improved communication

Better working relationships

Quality of life in the workplace

Greater recognition

More customer care

This study points towards one main idea of good performance. Performance is enhanced when goals are set by all parties with appropriate coaching. This enables both the coach and the student to be aware and responsible for the action plan developed. Coaching is an essential management tool used to optimize people's performance and potential. Demanding, commanding, persuading, instructing, and dictating might get the job done although it causes threats and sustains optimum performance. If the manager uses motivation correctly, it will have a better impact on performance. Motivation in coaching can be explained through Maslow's hierarchy of needs. Maslow's model proposes that food and water are basic human needs.

You’re 84% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
4 sources cited in this paper
  • Houldsworth, E., & Jirasinghe, D. (2010). Managing and measuring employee performance. London [u.a.: Kogan Page.
  • Raguenaud, V. (2009). Bilingual by choice: Raising kids in two (or more!) languages. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Pub.
  • Silverman, P. & Cober, A., B. (2005). "When Employees at Work Don't Get It: A Model for Enhancing Individual Employee Change in Response to Performance Feedback".
  • Wilson, C. (2007). Best practice in performance coaching: A handbook for leaders, coaches, HR professionals and organizations. London: Kogan Page.
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Performance Improvement Analysis Coaching Is a Skill,. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/performance-improvement-analysis-coaching-177949

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.