Personnel Offices The Personnel Function Reaction Paper

Patronage/spoils goes back to the founding of the United States, which is not a surprise, since loyalty was a predominant value post-revolution. Agencies in the United States value "merit and confidence" and merit principles are the core values of the majority of systems. Cayer moves on to listing the organizational questions that must be asked when choosing a personnel system, including which type of board is desirable, whether there is a centralized personnel office, and who has the final authority over personnel functions and the pros and cons of each decision. Bipartisan or nonpartisan commissions are the dominant choice for governance in the U.S. And have been since 1883. The main alternative to this model is the central personnel office which reports directly to the top executive and takes a role in leadership and management. Most systems combine a centralized and decentralized approach to minimize the associated pros and cons. Central agencies are largely responsible for policy-making, while the decentralized agencies tend to specific local concerns. The past decade has seen much more consolidation or even the elimination of civil service agencies as governments deal with budget defecits.

A species of their own, career bureaucrats (appointees) are often exempt from personnel office decisions as the personnel staff can't afford the political...

...

Career civil servants, on the other hand, have tenure and continue from one administration to the next. Systems for these employees are either open or closed. Closed systems promote from within; open systems recruit from both inside and outside the current agency.
Senior Executive Service organizes the personnel function so that matches up managers and administrators to work with each other; improves communication across units; improve public services image; improve administrators performance with rewards. Studies conflict about whether or not SES is effective.

Rank-in-person and rank-in-job are yet two more systems of personnel. Rank-in-person evaluates the person on performance. Rank-in-job means that the agency is structured around the work to be done -- position classification is key. This system makes advancement difficult, as individuals are not evaluated on their own merits.

Cayer concludes with the reminder that federal government requirements greatly influence the smaller jurisdiction personnel offices. Merit systems are often requirements for Federal funding, and many smaller offices feel overwhelmed by all of the rules. However, Cayer points out that these rules protect older workers, people with disabilities, and other groups that a local government may not take an interest in.

Cite this Document:

"Personnel Offices The Personnel Function" (2011, June 02) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personnel-offices-the-personnel-function-42267

"Personnel Offices The Personnel Function" 02 June 2011. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personnel-offices-the-personnel-function-42267>

"Personnel Offices The Personnel Function", 02 June 2011, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personnel-offices-the-personnel-function-42267

Related Documents

Office's Functions In Ontario, Canada, a key aspect in establishing a mass appraisal system and its effective operation is an automated property evaluation system. In addition, a completely registered real property and GIS database, covering all types of properties and transaction systems are created based on such a database. An integrated real property system and GIS are in operation in Ontario, Canada. The property center stores and updates real property

E., planning, organizing and controlling); b) behavioural approach (focuses on the role of the individual, his needs and desires; every individual is different, hence they should be approached appropriately); c) management science (the efficient, sometimes mathematical approach, solving problems); d) systems approach (designing a precise system made up of the most important management components that precisely fit the specific sports genre); and e) contingency approach (this works on the assumption

With these different departments having their own functions and responsibilities, the Company can be organized and run accordingly to the achievement of its objectives. Each employee in the organization has their individual roles and responsibilities. To properly execute and illustrate the four functions, we will look it in micro-level. For detailed application of these functions, let us pick Audit Department as a diagram. PLANNING and ORGANIZING Audit Department has an aim to

Functions of Management The four functions of management are planning, organizing, directing and controlling. Planning is the process of anticipating future events of action for achieving organizational goals. An effective plan aids in the crystallization of an organization's vision, works to avoid costly mistakes, and allows companies to seize opportunities. Effective planning requires an evaluation of the business environment and a well designed strategic plan of actions that are needed to

Personnel Law and Regulation
PAGES 15 WORDS 4135

Personnel Law and Regulation Workers Compensation Rehabilitation For nearly 100 years, the system of Worker's Compensation has been used in the United States. Worker's Compensation is legislated and administered at the state level. Accordingly, each state has passed their own laws and developed their own system to administer Worker's Compensation within their jurisdiction. Despite the differences of each state's benefits, the overall concept of Worker's Compensation is used in each state. The model

Functions of management are usually defined as planning, organizing, staffing, directing, and controlling the various resources of the organization. A service-based organization such as the Starbucks Corporation must give particularly careful attention to the organizing function of management regarding its use of human resources, given that the public face it presents to the world is an integral part of the product's reputation (Allison 2010). Starbucks must also devote care and