Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Ackerman, Terrence. "Why Doctors Should Intervene." Hastings Center Report. August 1982.
Terrence F. Ackerman's article "Why Doctors Should Intervene?" asks the central question not only when doctors should intervene in patient decision making, but also what is the appropriate relationship between a physician and his or her patient? Is the physician simply the provider of medical assistance? Or is there a parental role that the doctor must occasionally take on, when he or she believes the patient's needs are not being met because of a lack of patient information or understanding of the patient's medical condition? When should doctors intervene under such circumstances, Ackerman asks, as well as stating why intervention is occasionally necessary as well as feasible for physicians.
In his article, Ackerman suggests that case of physician potentially having to treat a patient, without the patient fully understanding his or her medical circumstances, can occur under numerous circumstances. These circumstances include, but are not limited to, the patient's unwillingness to accept treatment for personal, psychological, or religious reasons and the patient's family's desire to withhold or limit treatment or the patient's knowledge of his or her condition. Patient...
Ackerman notes, "patient autonomy has become a watchword of the medical profession," in recent years. (14).
In other words, doctors are more and more unwilling to exercise their own wills upon patient's decisions to accept treatment or to live or to die. Rather than 'playing God' doctors are encouraged to see doctors as facilitators of their patients' differently expressed wills, rather than possessing the ability to withhold or administer treatment based upon their own will.
However, critical to a patient's ability to accept or reject treatment is his or her ability to have full cognizance of his or her condition. Ackerman also states "knowledge of the patient's psychological and social situation are also necessary to help the patient act as a fully autonomous person." (14). In other words, certain conditions may impede a patient's ability to fully understand what he or…
Bioethics: Fetal tissue research and transplantation in the scientific research community has grown to attract huge debate and controversies since the late 1980s when doctors began to conclude that the bodies of unborn babies could be used in tackling certain diseases. This aspect continued to develop as scientists proposed that fetal tissue can also be used in helping infertile couples to have children. This is largely because these tissues can be
Bioethics: Transplant Case Study thorough examination of any "real life" ethical question involves the examination of all of the issues at hand. It is no different for issues of problematic bioethics. Thus, in consideration of the famous "botched heart transplant story," one must ask the salient questions, "what went wrong," "what should have been done," and "what can one do to insure that this issue will be less likely to
If the lungs are forced to keep breathing, such people can continue to digest food, excrete waste, and even bear children" (Cline 2013). In the case of total brain death, "the cessation of functioning in those parts of the brain responsible for consciousness and higher reasoning powers is necessary for the death of the 'person' aspect of the brain and body" has occurred (Cline 2013). Q4. Belmont report principles The 1979
Bioethics -- Assisted Suicide THREE-STEP MODEL-BASED ETHICAL ANALYSIS OF ASSISTED SUICIDE Introduction Assisted suicide, or euthanasia, is a controversial topic because it contradicts one of the most fundamental values of American and other Judeo-Christian teaching: namely, that human life is sacred. Similarly, in medicine, euthanasia violates the Hippocratic Oath, according to which the first ethical obligation of doctors is to do no harm. However, in modern society, that traditional prohibition against assisting others
Religioustolerance.org/euthanas.htm Stem cell research is a new field, one that was not yet envisioned by the apostles or other authors of the Bible. As a revolutionary form of healing, stem cell research and practice may not be entirely in conflict with scripture. Jesus was the ultimate healer, and therefore stem cell research can be viewed as an extension of this gift from God. Moreover, Luke himself was a physician who would
Indeed, by an active participation of the patient, we also tacitly understand that the patient is also fully informed about the course of the medical treatment, about his condition and even about the way scientific research affects his or her illness. On the other hand, this model has several important setbacks. First of all, it is a matter of time and usually a physician is involved with more than one