Philosophy Opposing Philosophical Views Philosophy Research Proposal

Length: 4 pages Sources: 4 Subject: Black Studies - Philosophy Type: Research Proposal Paper: #6923433 Related Topics: Philosophical, Philosophy, Aesthetics, Aristotle
Excerpt from Research Proposal :



Jacques Derrida has been accused of writing in a deliberately obtuse and obfuscated manner, so the relationship between his work and that of Plato's might not be immediately discernible. Perhaps the clearest connection between the two can be derived from Derrida's of Grammatology, especially as it compares to Plato's aesthetics and view of reality. In this rather dense treatise, Derrida first outlines the phenomenon of what he calls logocentrism -- the attitude that speech (logos in Greek) is the most basic and essential form of language, while writing is secondary in development and its ability to reflect meaning. Derrida claims that logocentrism has long been a silent and foundational part of Western thought, even from the time of Plato.

Plato believed that truth and meaning existed in a pure state somewhere, with the shadows of meanings existing in our own world. Derrida sees this as a flawed worldview, though not without potential. He uses some of Plato's thinking to deconstruct logocentrism. If speech is merely a representation of thought, and writing just a representation of speech, than writing is a representation of a representation -- the evil mimesis of Plato's aesthetics. Through his method of deconstructing such binary oppositions, Derrida makes it clear (or at least as clear as he ever makes anything) that both speech and writing our subservient to each other, and actually create meaning. This has to do with the deceptively simple concepts of presence and absence -- writing is present for the reader, whereas speech is always-already absent, having passed before the thoughts it contains can be processed. Derrida then claims not hat writing is more important than speech, but that both are equally adept at creating meaning and not merely represnting it; there is no meaning without presence, and so the speaker (or author) ceases to matter.

...

Aristotle proposed another opposite to Plato's conception of mimesis. He agreed that all art was mimesis -- an imitation -- but noted that humans were naturally imitative creatures. But despite the fact that all humans had the capability of mimesis, it is also easily noted that some are better at it than others. That is, some imitations were better at achieving the emotional release or catharsis that Aristotle thought should be the aim of all art, especially drama (Poetics, 1449b). Therefore authorship was of immense importance to Aristotle. Each author was an individual conduit of imaginative imitation that could never again be produced, and meaning was created by individual interpretation.

Foucault's essay "What is an Author?" can be read as a direct extension of such Aristotelian beliefs. He comments on our tendency to imagine authors as isolated beings, not admitting that they are products of their times. He also nots that their words do not exist in a vacuum, and thoughthe words of a book would not change if it was discovered to have been written by a different author, our perception of those words and their meanings would. Meaning -- not just words themselves, the representations of meaning -- is subjective, according to Foucault. This makes the question of authorship of great importance in establishing truth.

It should be clear now why it is said that Plato is to Derrida as Aristotle is to Foucault. The concepts of aesthetics and truth follow a convoluted path over the millennia between the two sets of philosophers, and the issues are still unresolved.

Cite this Document:

"Philosophy Opposing Philosophical Views Philosophy" (2009, April 14) Retrieved April 13, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-opposing-philosophical-views-22979

"Philosophy Opposing Philosophical Views Philosophy" 14 April 2009. Web.13 April. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-opposing-philosophical-views-22979>

"Philosophy Opposing Philosophical Views Philosophy", 14 April 2009, Accessed.13 April. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-opposing-philosophical-views-22979

Related Documents
Philosophy and Morality Instructions the Exam Consists
Words: 2703 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Mythology - Religion Paper #: 10011484

Philosophy and Morality INSTRUCTIONS The exam consists essays. Please essays document. Please plagiarize. Be paraphrase verbatim language authors putting quotation marks. You document sources, -text citation ( footnotes) a reference page. Philosophy John Arthur's "Morality, Religion, and Conscience," A concern on the relationship between morality and religion is an ancient argument that continues in philosophy in the present times. The argument is mainly on whether morality emanates from an institution or religious background. Theologians

Philosophy of Truth One of
Words: 2626 Length: 9 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 98700395

Knowledge and truth were considered absolute and immutable by these two, though for very different reasons, which is the complete antithesis to the empirical theories of Popper, Peirce, Kuhn, and James. The progression of knowledge in the face of such certainty could only result in pure growth from previously established claims, as no truth could ever be said to exist that was not thoroughly and absolutely proved by careful

Philosophy of Science As Developed by Empiricists David Hume and...
Words: 876 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 91600864

philosophy of science as developed by empiricists such as David Hume and completed by the logical positivist group. Why do they think truth can be best found by using the senses, the experimental method, and probability? Explain the verifiability theory and its meaning for such subjects as God, the super-natural, justice, morality, and political science. What are the advantages and the limitations of this philosophical view? The "Verifiability" or "Verificationist

Philosophy Traditional Naturalist Claims: The
Words: 1140 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Black Studies - Philosophy Paper #: 4227971

3). The naturalist position is further "bolstered" by a fundamental faith in the veracity of sensory inputs and human cognitive processes, a faith that is woefully misplaced. In fact, the naturalist belief in random evolution undermines any belief in the ability of human senses to derive truth about the workings of the universe (Plantinga 2). Those who believe in a supernatural deity often believe that said deity imbued human beings

Philosophy in the Scenario, George
Words: 1071 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Business - Ethics Paper #: 23780662

E., it removes subjectivity as a vantage point). It is also hard to tell how much unhappiness is created and how to weigh it against the happiness that is created (e.g., how much George would hate his job?, how much suffering will the warmonger go through because he did not get this job?). Further, quantification of happiness or suffering becomes a real issue when trying to determine things on a

Philosophy of Behaviorism for Centuries,
Words: 2430 Length: 9 Pages Topic: Psychology Paper #: 11203633

Within its strict perspective of humanity, there is no room for free will; actions are automatic responses to prompts from one's surroundings. It goes without saying that behaviorists do not allow for mankind's soul; this does not rest well with most, particularly with theologians and religious leaders. Naturally, such perspectives on humanity are not acceptable to many. What's more, behaviorism is harshly reproached for its inability to generalize behavior.