Verified Document

Presidents Ulysses S. Grant And Research Paper

The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War and which Wilson played a key part in negotiating, was never ratified by the U.S. Congress and, as a result, the United States never became a member of the League of Nations. Wilson's behavior in reaction to opposition in Congress regarding the Versailles Treaty, in general, and the League of Nations portion of that Treaty, specifically, may be the best indication of the similarities between himself and President Grant. Both men had a strong stubborn streak that often interfered with their otherwise competent leadership skills. In Grant's case, his stubbornness was characterized by his misguided loyalty to his friends and military associates. Throughout his two administrations, Grant continued to surround himself with his friends and former military associates and place such individuals in positions of authority instead of utilizing the services of talented and experienced politicians. The result was that his relationship with Congress suffered and his administrations were fraught with numerous and, seemingly, endless scandals. Because he refused to listen to his political advisors, Grant's two terms of office are looked upon by most historical experts as being largely ineffective.

Wilson's stubbornness manifested itself throughout his tenure in office but until the end of his second term never was the source of any particular political detriment, however, his stance on the League of Nations tainted a Presidency that otherwise was considered successful. Through most of his eight years in office Wilson had effectively led the country and, despite being unsuccessful in keeping the country out of the First World War, was viewed favorably by the public. The battle of the ratification of the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations, however, proved to be the political undoing of Wilson and, ultimately, it proved to be his physical undoing as well. Wilson worked as hard at attempting to convince the American public as to the merits of the League of Nations as he had in convincing the rest of the world of its merits but in his efforts to do so Wilson lost his political and physical viability. Worn down, Wilson suffered a severe stroke in October of 1919...

Grant, although a graduate of West Point, was never considered to be a particularly cerebral individual. Prone to drinking heavily, Grant was unkempt and vulgar in terms of his interactions with others. Wilson, on the other hand, was one of the nation's most educated Presidents and always the proper gentleman. Yet, both men were able to reach the nation's highest office and successfully complete two terms of office and lead their country through turbulent times.
History has been much kinder to Wilson than it has been to Grant. Although Wilson's administration ended on a sour note, his efforts at encouraging the country's participation in the League of Nations has earned him respect and the fact that the United States later led the drive for the formation of the United Nations serves as an endorsement of Wilson's position. Grant's reputation as a President, unfortunately, continues to suffer (Wilentz, 2010). Hindsight has done little to dispel how ineffective Grant was as a political leader. His ineffectiveness led to many of the subsequent problems that developed in the deep South and contributed to the effects of the Panic of 1873.

Strangely, both men left office under a cloud yet one has become to be viewed as one of the nation's best Presidents while the other is considered among its worst. Therein, both represent how precarious the winds of popularity are and how popularity so seldom represents effectiveness.

References

Cooper, J. (2011). Woodrow Wilson: A Biography. London: Vintage.

Livermore, S.W. (1966). Woodrow Wilson and the war Congress. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Mantell, M.E. (1973). Johnson, Grant, and the Politics of Reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.

Smith, J.E. (2001). Grant. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Wilentz, S. (2010, March 14). Who's Buried in the History Books? New York Times, p. WK9.

Wilson, W. (1917). Seeking Declaration of War. Joint Session of Congress. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress.

Administration

Sources used in this document:
References

Cooper, J. (2011). Woodrow Wilson: A Biography. London: Vintage.

Livermore, S.W. (1966). Woodrow Wilson and the war Congress. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Mantell, M.E. (1973). Johnson, Grant, and the Politics of Reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.

Smith, J.E. (2001). Grant. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Grant and Wilson I Propose That Doing
Words: 670 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Proposal

Grant and Wilson I propose that doing a comparison of Presidents Ulysses S. Grant and Woodrow Wilson would allow for a comprehensive understanding of how the leadership styles of these two men shaped the United States of America during their respective administrations. They will be compared in terms of their public and political leadership, how they functioned as Chief Executive and the leader of the Executive Branch, and how they functioned

Civil War and Grant the Civil War
Words: 3417 Length: 10 Document Type: Term Paper

Civil War and Grant The Civil War in the United States can be considered as the darkest moment in its relatively young history. (Mitgang, 2000) His Gettysburg State of the Union Address is perhaps the shortest in history; but the depth of meaning and the profundity of emotions it invokes should never be forgotten. It starkly contrasts with the inane, self-congratulatory blather of modern presidential administrations. This hotly contested War had amazing

Campaigns of Grant and Wilson
Words: 1287 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

However, he advocated a policy of conservative, limited government and opposed the policies of the Republican's view of punishing the South during Reconstruction. Seymour was quite competitive in his run against Grant with the popular vote, but was soundly defeated by an electoral vote of 214 (Grant) to 80 (Waugh, 2009). Grant had a particularly easy campaign, running on his war record, a desire to repair the Union, and a

Successful Presidents 1861 to 1969
Words: 2701 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

Cold War, the president of the United States was often referred to as the "leader of the free world." This connotes an image of someone with an unsurpassed amount of power and responsibility. From 1861 to 1969, the role of President of the United States progressed from being that of the leader of a moderately powerful, factious republic to being one who was almost singularly responsible for the defense

Profiles on American Presidents Life and Presidency
Words: 870 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

American President Biography Generally considered to be the greatest president of the United States, who freed four million slaves and saved the nation after leading the Union to victory in the Civil War of 1861-65, Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky in 1809 to a pioneer family on what was then the western frontier of the United States. His family then moved to southern Indiana in 1816 and southern Illinois three years

American Presidents the United States
Words: 791 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

His accomplishments included simplifying government jobs, and helping create the Democratic Party. He is most remembered as a great general and for defying Congress. Martin Van Buren served from 1837 to 1841. He was married to Hannah, and he died in 1862. His vice-president was Richard Johnson, and his nickname was the "Little Magician." His accomplishments included regulating banks and federal funds, and creating an independent treasury. He is

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now