Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
In Defense of Tyranny: The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
Niccolo Machiavelli, Italian historian, statesman, and philosopher of the Renaissance period, was known for his discourse, The Prince, published in the 16th century, for discussing his views on political leadership, particularly that of tyranny. In fact, The Prince is best described as a discourse on tyranny and authoritarian rule, and embodied through the Prince's personality, Machiavelli sets his standards on what kind of leader will benefit both the state and its people from threats against invasion from foreign rule.
This paper discusses two important aspects of Machiavelli's The Prince: (1) the characteristics of the Prince and the kind of society he will rule and (2) the permissiveness of tyranny in making society secure from foreign invasion/rule. Provided with these two important factors, this paper posits that Machiavelli's The Prince illustrates how tyranny can be functional (instead of detrimental) to ensure peace and stability within society, especially in the context of 16th century Western governance.
This position must first be established by looking into the political movements in the Western society -- that is, the historical context whereby Machiavelli's discourse was created. 16th century-Italian society is characterized by chaos, where French, Spanish, and German forces tried to conquer the...
As a citizen and observer of these political conflicts in his country, Machiavelli decided that to make Italy secure from foreign invasion, Italian society must become independent and united under one rational and wise leader -- in the persona of the Prince. Thus, the Prince and tyranny served as Machiavelli's elements for an ideal government in an unstable society.
Going further into his analysis of the socio-political movements in his country, Machiavelli's observation includes an analyses of the qualities of the leaders or 'princes' who were not able to sustain their leadership and government. In chapter XXIV ("Why the Princes of Italy Have Lost their States"), he explains that these leaders have been "defective... some of them either had the people against them, or... they have not known how to secure themselves against their nobles." Furthermore, in this section, while Machiavelli attributes Fortune as one of the motivating forces that determine a leader's success in governance, the leader's skills and influence to the people, in large part, determines the success or failure of the Prince. Thus, in effect, he asserts, "I think it may be the case that Fortune is the mistress of one half of our actions, and yet leaves the control of the other half, or a little less, to ourselves."
Thus, having looked into the past mistakes of leaders and princes of Italy, Machiavelli formulates his own standards in…
Works Cited
Machiavelli, N. (1992). The Prince. NY W.W. Norton & Co.
" Parallels with business takeovers are frighteningly stark. Change. In the Prince he says "It must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things" (Machiavelli). Relevancy...and Not The impact of Machiavelli's writing on politics has been accepted for some time, but the relevance of his ideas to business had to wait until
Hitler was an aggressive, dominant leader who was revered by many Germans. He overtook Poland and other nations such as Norway with virtually no defense at all because they were unprepared and their leaders did not anticipate or approve of aggression and defense. They were wrong, and it cost them dearly. If these nations had put up a real fight, the war might have had a different outcome. The
However, it was after his imprisonment that Machiavelli showed 'Machiavellian' traits, as he tried to pursue his political philosophy by gaining his once-deferred power by the Medici family. Machiavelli shows his Machiavellianism by devising ways to win their favor once again, and these ways include creating discourses that reflect the family's method of governing Italy. By reflecting through the image of the Medici family the image of resolute and
This belief came in response to the realities of the time that saw corruption and lust for riches as the main interests in the political life. Both Gandhi and Machiavelli saw self restrain as an important quality, even though the reasons deferred. In today's political life, there is more and more evidence of the applicability of the concepts advocated by Machiavelli centuries ago. The constant use of the notion Machiavellian
Republicans recently overtook Democrats in fundraising, for instance, yet they will continue to play the underdog on most issues because the "good" qualities of security and being disadvantaged (which is generally viewed favorably in the country) are mutually exclusive, and because the appearance of being the underdog helps their cause regardless of its truth. This also reflects a singularity of purpose and a determination that one's own conclusions, and not those
They might make good holiday spots but they do not make good political partners. Because almost all of the countries that do not maintain a military have treaties with nations that do, few nations can be classified as being truly demilitarized. The nations with explicit pacifist clauses in their constitutions like Costa Rica would be unable to withstand invasion from a hostile nation and are therefore useless in terms of