Quality Management Analysis And Recommendations For Rubicon Essay

Length: 4 pages Sources: 4 Subject: Business Type: Essay Paper: #9118731 Related Topics: Six Sigma, Total Quality Management, Hotel Management, Process Analysis
Excerpt from Essay :

Quality Management Analysis and Recommendations for Rubicon Group -- a Travelcom Company

It is common for quality management symptoms and problems to appear when two or more organizations are integrated together, as is the case of the business units within the Rubicon Group. It is imperative however in assessing support services using quality management frameworks and techniques to not focus too closely on the symptoms and not see the greater strategic challenges and roadblocks standing in the way of greater levels of customer service quality (Sepic, McNabb, 1994). The intent of this analysis is to explain how Rubicon Group can use the frameworks of Total Quality Management (TQM), Six Sigma, lean principles and balanced scorecards (BSC) to attain a higher level of performance and customer satisfaction. Treating the symptoms will only get the customer service team so far. A key underlying assumption of this analysis is that the fundamental nature of what is expected of customer service and the value they deliver has changed. Using these techniques, Rubicon can get re-centred on customers and begin to build a more lean, efficient framework for serving customers and holding onto them over the long-term.

Analysis of Rubicon Quality Management Problems

The increased call volumes, exponentially increasing workloads on customer service representatives and the resulting increased complaints and customer requests for special assistance all point to the quality management platforms or frameworks that Rubicon customer service is based on are broken. What first needs to be done is that a Total Quality Management (TQM) analysis...

...

These tow elements, customer requirements and design requirements in turn are pivotal to having the TQM House of Quality constructed (Ooi, Lin, Tan, Chong, 2011).

The scoring of factors in the TQM House of Quality can also assure that further efforts to increase quality of service levels are on the right track, focusing on the best possible metrics. As a foundational structure for guiding future Six Sigma, TQM, lean and BSC initiatives the TQM House of Quality anchors all other initiatives back to a quantified customer-centric set of priorities (Dervitsiotis, 2011). Of particular interest is the roof of the House of Quality as the prioritization fo factors in this effort will determine which problem areas need to be addressed first with Six Sigma-based improvement strategies (Li, Wu, Yen, Lee, 2011).

At Rubicon, the main problems will surface with a TQM House of Quality Audit. From there, additional Six Sigma projects can be undertaken by key functional area. Immediately apparent in applying the TQM House of Quality to the Rubicon case is the lack of synchronization and no single system of record for all systems and strategies to serve customers. This is an ideal project to be undertaken using the DMAIC methodology of Six Sigma, placing the customer and their needs at the center of the problem statement and steps to resolve it

(Li, Wu, Yen, Lee, 2011). Clearly there is a lack of system integration and more systemic than that, a complete lack of process integration as well. While more research would be needed to validate this, the symptoms point to a significant disconnect across produces and data areas, which is contributing to the increased customer wait times, their levels of dissatisfaction and the increase in the number of clients given to each customer service representative. All of these symptoms point to faulty or incomplete systems of record and an approach to problem solving that is manually-based and therefore very…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Apgar, D.. (2011). Assumption-Based Metrics: Recipe for Success. Strategic Finance, 93(5), 27-33,1.

Amado, C., Santos, S., & Marques, P.. (2012). Integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Balanced Scorecard approaches for enhanced performance assessment. Omega, 40(3), 390.

Dervitsiotis, K.. (2011). The New Imperative for Leadership-Advancing From Quality to Innovation. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 34(3), 11,15-17.

Li, S., Wu, C., Yen, D., & Lee, M.. (2011). Improving the efficiency of IT help-desk service by Six Sigma management methodology (DMAIC) - a case study of C. company. Production Planning & Control, 22(7), 612.


Cite this Document:

"Quality Management Analysis And Recommendations For Rubicon" (2011, December 12) Retrieved April 22, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/quality-management-analysis-and-recommendations-53331

"Quality Management Analysis And Recommendations For Rubicon" 12 December 2011. Web.22 April. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/quality-management-analysis-and-recommendations-53331>

"Quality Management Analysis And Recommendations For Rubicon", 12 December 2011, Accessed.22 April. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/quality-management-analysis-and-recommendations-53331

Related Documents
Business Environment the Growth of
Words: 2860 Length: 9 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 50298448

UK National Environment In UK, the allocation of resources is purely based on the forces of demand and supply. This form of economy is a free economy in which competition is embraced and firms have to become efficient to increase their level of competitiveness. The government only intervene to provide the necessary infrastructure and to ensure that consumers are not exploited by the businesses. Besides, the government will formulate policies that

SWOT Resource & Capability
Words: 3073 Length: 19 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 46087473

SWOT Resource and Capability Ethics and Social Responsibility Fundamental principles of ethical leadership comprise of having honesty and integrity, taking note of all stakeholders, building community, and respecting the individual. Leaders ought to seek solutions to a sequence of significant questions prior to reaching a decision regarding an issue that is not clearly either ethical or unethical (DuBrin, 2016). The leader in question is Mary T. Barra, the Chairman and Chief Executive