Rcsi Institute Of Leadership Ponv Literature Review

PAGES
5
WORDS
1395
Cite

comparison

Data were collected at regular intervals by blinded personnel for 48 hours after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's ranked sum test and ?(2) test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

n/a

n/a

n/a

cumulative incidence of vomiting at 48 hours was 16% in the aprepitant group and 38% in the ondansetron group (P = 0.0149). The incidence of vomiting was also decreased in the aprepitant group at 2 hours (6% vs. 21%, P = 0.0419) and 24 hours (14% vs. 36%, P = 0.0124). From 0 to 48 hours, there was no difference between the aprepitant and ondansetron groups in the incidence of nausea (69% vs. 60%), nausea scores, need for rescue antiemetics (65% vs. 60%), complete response (no PONV and no rescue, 22% vs. 36%), or patient satisfaction with the management of PONV.

combination of aprepitant and dexamethasone was more effective than was the combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone for prophylaxis against postoperative vomiting in adult patients undergoing craniotomy under general anesthesia. However, there was no difference between the groups in the incidence or severity of nausea, need for rescue antiemetics, or in complete response between the groups.

Vigneault, et al. ((2010)

Systematic review of literature

29 Studies involving 1754 patients

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases

Literature review summative dose and safety of IVLI should be established before recommending its use.

n/a

n/a

At six hours postoperatively, intravenous lidocaine infusion reduced pain at rest (weighted mean difference [WMD] -8.70, 95% confidence intervals [CI] -16.19 to -1.21), during cough (WMD -11.19, 95% CI -17.73 to -4.65), and during movement (WMD -9.56, 95% CI -17.31 to -1.80). Intravenous lidocaine infusion also reduced opioid requirement (morphine) (WMD -8.44 mg, 95% CI -11.32 to -5.56), time to first flatus (WMD -7.62 hr, 95% CI -10.78 to -4.45), time to first feces (WMD -10.71 hr, 95% CI -16.14 to -5.28), nausea/vomiting (risk ratios = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.90), and hospital length of stay (WMD -0.17 days, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.07).

Rhee, et al. (2010)

Survey.

1191 patients

Surveys

Longitudinal

Interpretive and summative n/a n/a

Postoperative backache and dissatisfaction

The dissatisfaction rate of spinal anesthesia...

...

The refusal rate to have spinal anesthesia again was 3.2%
Although spinal anesthesia was conducted safely during the study and revealed a high rate of patient satisfaction (96.3%), side effects still occurred. Therefore, attending anesthesiologists must perform the procedure carefully and always pay attention to patients under spinal anesthesia.

Simurina et al. (2010)

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled study.

120 ASA physical status I and II women, aged 21 to 76 years, undergoing elective gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Patients were randomized to receive a gas mixture of 30% oxygen in air (FIO (2) = 0.3, Group G30), 50% oxygen in air (FIO (2) = 0.5, Group G50), or 80% oxygen in air (FIO (2) = 0.8, Group G80); there were 36 patients in each group. A standardized sevoflurane general anesthesia, postoperative pain management, and antiemetic regimen were used.

Frequency of nausea, vomiting, and both was assessed for early (0 to two hrs) and late PONV (two to 24 hrs), along with use of rescue antiemetic, degree of nausea, and severity of pain.

interpretive n/a n/a n/a

G80 patients had significantly less vomiting than Group G30 at two hours, 3% (1/36) vs. 22% (8/36), respectively, P = 0.028

High intraoperative FIO (2) of 0.8 and FIO (2) of 0.5 do not prevent PONV in patients without antiemetic prophylaxis. An intraoperative FIO (2) of 0.8 has a beneficial effect on early vomiting only.

Miyagawa et al. (2010)

A prospective cohort study design

Sixty-eight patients, aged between 20 and 80 years, were scheduled for a standardized general anaesthetic technique.

Patients who were given methylprednisolone were assigned as the steroid cover group, and those who were not given methylprednisolone formed the non-steroid cover group.

PONV were assessment by direct questioning or spontaneous complaints by patients 1 week after surgery. Postoperative pain was evaluated using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 1 and 3 days after surgery.

n/a

n/a

The incidence of nausea in the steroid cover group was significantly less than that in the non-steroid cover group (adjusted odds ratio, 0-17, P = 0 021), but there was no significant difference in vomiting between the two…

Cite this Document:

"Rcsi Institute Of Leadership Ponv" (2010, November 30) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rcsi-institute-of-leadership-ponv-6266

"Rcsi Institute Of Leadership Ponv" 30 November 2010. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rcsi-institute-of-leadership-ponv-6266>

"Rcsi Institute Of Leadership Ponv", 30 November 2010, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/rcsi-institute-of-leadership-ponv-6266

Related Documents

Placebos in Clinical Practice REINFORCING MIND-BODY LINK Medical dictionaries define placebo as a non-medication substance, prescribed or given to reinforce the patient's expectation to get well. Research on the effect of placebos is of great significance to healthcare professionals because of their widespread use. That widespread use draws from their effect in the improvement of a symptom or disease without specifically improving the condition under treatment. That effect, called the placebo effect,

Whether someone views something as a placebo or not from a medical standpoint, if it improves the health and well-being of a patient then it is good for that patient, and good for the medical community as a whole (Ambrose, 2007). The second reason for the health care system to allow alternative medicine is that people believe in it in the same way that they believe in placebo pills if

Placebo Trials
PAGES 2 WORDS 451

Placebo Drugs One of the most important factors involved in medical trials is probably ethics. Concerns like participant autonomy and informed consent are among the top priorities of the research clinician. This is why the use of placebos in clinical trials produces some murky waters, particularly with issues like the current Ebola crisis in Sub-Saharan Africa. While it is definitely acceptable to use a placebo in some cases, other cases produce

Placebos Proposition Fact (Proposition: Placebos actual benefits patients) 1. You defend a proposition fact relevant significant a future proposition policy, argue values policies essay. IMPORTANT!! 2. The essay carefully strucutured standard parts a formal essay. Proposition of Fact Placebos can have actual benefits to patients Placebos are sham or fake treatments that are given to patients, in place of actual treatment. A doctor can decide to issue this kind of treatment to a

Croop et al. (1997). The overall safety profile of naltrexone is good; however, care must be taken in prescribing the drug to certain patient populations; e.g., naltrexone shows a dose-dependent hepatotoxicity (package insert) and is therefore contraindicated in patients with significant hepatic impairment, which is frequently encountered in alcohol-dependent populations. The clinical trials of naltrexone have typically been conducted in patients without significant impairment in hepatic function. Another consequence of the hepatic

Gingko Biloba
PAGES 8 WORDS 2356

Ginko Biloba Gingko Biloba -- Part I What are the author's general conclusions (summarized) on the effectiveness of Gingko Biloba as a cognitive enhancer? According to the author, effects of Gingko on cognition are perplexing because of its dual actions as following. It's seen improving short-term memory but at the same time it impairs digit recall ability. It slows down mental decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease but has lower dose response curve