International Tort
An intentional tort is a type of tort that occurs when someone deliberately causes harm or injury to another person or their property. Unlike negligence, which involves a failure to exercise reasonable care, intentional torts involve a deliberate act that results in harm (McKinsey & Burke, 2023).
There are several types of intentional torts, including assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Each of these torts requires proof that the defendant intentionally engaged in the conduct that caused harm to the plaintiff (McKinsey & Burke, 2023).
In order for a plaintiff to succeed in an intentional tort claim, they must prove that the defendant had the intent to cause harm or knew that their actions would result in harm. However, intent does not necessarily mean that the defendant intended to cause the specific harm that occurred. It may be enough to show that they intended to engage in the conduct that resulted in harm. For example,...
If the plaintiff suffered an injury as a result of the contact, they can still bring a claim for an intentional tort.In some cases, the defendant may not...
…plaintiff (McKinsey & Burke, 2023).In contrast, defenses to negligence typically focus on the defendant's lack of fault or responsibility for the harm that occurred. The most common defenses to negligence include contributory negligence, comparative negligence, assumption of risk, and the statute of limitations. Contributory negligence occurs when the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injuries, while comparative negligence reduces the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to their degree of fault. Assumption of risk occurs when the plaintiff voluntarily assumes the risk of harm, such as by participating in a dangerous activity. The statute of limitations is a defense that bars a plaintiff from bringing a claim after a certain period of…
References
McKinsey, J. A. & Burke, D.D. (2023). Carper's Understanding the Law, 7th ed., CengageLearning Publishers.
Federal Tort Claims Act Federal Tort Claims The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) (P.L. 79-601, 60 Stat. 842) was enacted by U.S. Congress in August 1946, according to which any individual can sue the federal government for personal damages, like loss of money and property, physical injury or any other such situation caused by federal organization and its employees, while working within the limits of employment. The person can file claims against
Department of Veterans Affairs Claims Processing Dilemmas Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is a cabinet-level agency in the U.S. government. The mission of the VA is taken from Lincoln's second inaugural address and is to "care for him who shall have borne the battle, his widow and orphans." Pursuant to this fundamental mission, the VA administers the largest healthcare system in the country and has trained more than half of all
Federal Tort Claims Act Traditionally, the federal government was immune from lawsuits by its citizens under a doctrine known as sovereign immunity. Theoretically, this immunity was justified because people would necessarily have disagreements with the government and resorting to the court system to help resolve those disputes could have resulted in a tremendous waste of time and energy. However, the situation left people with no solution when they were harmed by
False claims act contain 'qui tam' or whistleblower provisions. This work will discuss the pros and cons of being a whistleblower and to ask the question of if one were aware of the fraudulent issues in the healthcare organization why would they not report the issues? In 1975, in the case (NLRB vs. Weingarten, Inc. 420 U.S. 251, 88 LRRM 2689 the U.S. Supreme Court established the rights of employees to
Discount Scheme for Health Insurance No Claim Discount (NCD) Schemes are Frequency-rating systems and are commonly used in insurance. NCD schemes represent an attempt to categorize policyholders into relatively homogeneous risk groups who pay premiums relative to their claims experience. Those who have made few claims in recent years are rewarded with discounts on their initial premium, and hence are enticed to stay with the company (Boland, 2006). Depending on
So, with these very expensive claims related costs, it is essential that carriers surrogate as many of these costs as possible and because of the inherent relation to the claims process, claims management offices and functions should be fully responsible for investigating and implementing the subrogation process. Claims managers have the authority to oversee settlements and to point claims adjusters in the right direction for initiating any necessary investigations
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now