Verified Document

Reforming Education Again Chapter

No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law by President Bush in 2002 as a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) that was enacted in 1965 and re-enacted in 1994. The Elementary and Secondary Act also encompasses Title I, which is significant as it provides additional support for students who are disadvantaged, a factor that is often prominent in discussion of overall student performance in the United States. The nation has given considerable attention to ESEA as it has established more stringent and ambitious standards on public school, professional educators, and the students who attend public schools in the United States. Moreover, the role of the government has been expended through the act to ensure that underprivileged children receive equitable educational opportunities. The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was intended to improve student achievement and applied a four-pronged approach to the ensuring educational progress along those lines: 1) The instructional methods used in schools must be evidence-based; 2) parents are to be given options for the education of their children; 3) growth targets are to be established by individual schools and states; and, 4) schools are held accountable for hiring and supervising qualified teachers, and for the performance...

One area of research that should receive future attention from the United States Department of Education and education research think tanks across the country is the impact of allowing flexibility in the way in which teachers demonstrate that they are highly qualified. During 2005-2006, U.S. public schools were required to demonstrate that all teachers were highly qualified, and a set of flexible standards was published (Ballard & Bates, 2008). Highly qualified teachers must hold bachelor's degrees, have full state certification or licensure, and prove that they know each subject they teach (Ballard & Bates, 2008). NCLB requires states to assess the degree to which all students -- particularly disadvantaged and minority students -- have highly qualified teachers, and schools must submit reports about their progress in meeting these goals (Ballard & Bates, 2008; Linn, et al., 2002). NCLB permits states to explore different ways for current teachers to demonstrate their competency in subject matter and thereby meet the highly qualified…

Sources used in this document:
Resources

____. (2004, March). NCLB / Proven Methods: New No Child Left Behind Flexibility: Highly Qualified Teachers. U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/methods/teachers/hqtflexibility.html

Ballard, K. & Bates, A. (2008, December). Making a Connection between Student Achievement, Teacher Accountability, and Quality Classroom Instruction. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 560-580. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/ballard.pdf

Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., & Betebenner, D.W. (2002, August-September). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3 -- 16. doi:10.3102/0013189x031006003.

Hanushek, E.A. & Rivkin, S.G. (2010, Summer). The quality and distribution of teachers under the No Child Left Behind Act. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 133 -- 150. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/20799159?sid=21106017561773&uid=4&uid=3739256&uid=2&uid=3739920
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now