Relational Satisfaction As A Function Of Relational Research Proposal

PAGES
4
WORDS
1385
Cite

Relational satisfaction as a function of relational maintenance techniques and relational satisfaction as a function of type and frequency of contact between spouses. There are two contradictory maxims that complicate the military phenomena: the first is "out of sight out of mind." The second is "absence makes the heart grow fonder." As applied to the military situation with one spouse separated from the other over long periods of intermittent time, the first maxim denotes that connection of one spouse to the other will be weakened, whilst the second maxim indicates that the opposite effect will occur and that their relationship will be strengthened due too the intensity of their longing for one another. Most research studies on military relationships seem to tend to the former indicating that the marital dynamics often seem to be at risk due to the periodically long and consistent separation of one spouse from the other (e.g. Galloway, 1987).

Sigman (1991) maintains that most relational theorists err when they define and study relationships as occurring only in the face-to-face interaction. On the contrary, relations are maintained in a variety of ways, and the entire span of the relationship dynamic has to be considered -- absence too not only face-to-face interactions. Relationships stretch across space and time. They should be considered as occurring within the format of a continuum and according to Sigman (1991), the seemingly continuous nature of relationships is merely a myth; most of it is conducted by and strengthened through the discontinues moments of non-immediate interaction. Relationships are not only maintained and operated through interactions between the two partners, but also continue 'outside and apart from any particular interactional event" (p.108) and, in fact, the very perquisites for their continuation requires some moving in and out of physical space over varying periods of time.

Relational dialectics express the same idea: People want to be together. On the other hand, they also seek some form of autonomy. Autonomy and connection are not contradictors. The one reinforces the other. In fact they are unified opposites in that "they negate one another, at the same time they are interdependent...

...

Participants were a combination of undergraduate students and adults who were in a long-distance romantic relationship with another and only saw the other on an infrequent intermittent basis. Couples were both interviewed and asked to complete a survey. Rresutls discovered that both forces of being together and being apart influenced one another in both enabling and constraining ways. The time spent together, for instance, refreshes or rejuvenates the partners, whilst the time apart works to construct valuable memories of the other and create a sense of sentimental and romantic longing. The time apart, too, makes the time that they are together all the more precious since they experience an intensity of quality time that they would likely never have had otherwise, and their distances make them endeavor all the more to make their time together more special. At the same time, their element of preciousness may put pressure on the relationship in that they strain to make the most of the pocket of time that they have together. This depends on how it is managed.
Another aspect, Sahlstein (2004) found, that contributes to the specialty of the distance-distance relationship is that both partners have had time apart to focus on other things and collect interesting experiences in the absence of the other. Sharing this when together brings an element of interest to the time they spend together

Sahlstein (2004) concluded that while researchers who have studied long-distance relationships have consistently assumed that time apart weakens the relationships, her study shows the opposite: that not only does it not weaken but that it also reinforces the relationships influencing it in many positive ways.

My hypothesis, consequently, when extending Sahlstein's (2004) study to the military field is that similar dynamics may occur. Rather than military relationships wakening as several studies…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Baxter, L.A., & Montgomery, B.M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York: Guilford Press.

Breakwell, G.M., Hammond, S., & Fife-Schaw, C. (2007). Research methods in psychology. Sage, USA.

Galloway, J. (1987) Women in Combat Air University Review, Pdf. airpower.maxwell.af.mil

Sahlstein, EM (2004). Relating at a distance: Negotiating being together and being apart in long-distance relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 21(5): 689 -- 710


Cite this Document:

"Relational Satisfaction As A Function Of Relational" (2011, December 01) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/relational-satisfaction-as-a-function-of-48092

"Relational Satisfaction As A Function Of Relational" 01 December 2011. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/relational-satisfaction-as-a-function-of-48092>

"Relational Satisfaction As A Function Of Relational", 01 December 2011, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/relational-satisfaction-as-a-function-of-48092

Related Documents

Relational Discourse in a Film of Your Choice Conceptual Framework Discussion Forms of relational development Primary factors draw predominantly from Knapp's version of relationships: utilizing "steps." Nevertheless, this text utilizes the concept of moving up/down-similar to a lift) (Khanna, 2010) Motion via the stages: • Motion usually systematic as well as sequential. Nevertheless, sequence has been interchangeable/fluid; a few stages might be neglected. • Motion might be onward-in the direction of higher intimacy if continuing

Research Aim The purpose of this research is to investigate customer's loyalty throughout the dimensions of satisfaction, trust and commitment for mobile phone industry in Bangkok, Thailand. In addition, this research also provides practical knowledge which customers are dissimilar in satisfaction and look for different levels of relationship with mobile phones. To sum up briefly, it is completely useful for marketers to comprehend which paradigms affect customers to create good relationship

Question 1 Background: A relational contract can be described as “informal agreements and unwritten codes of conduct that powerfully affect the behavior of individuals, clearly emphasizing the informal nature of contracts.” (Ho?hn 35) They help businesses overcome obstacles typically faced in formal contracting. Formal contracts must be written in a manner that allows for easy verification by any third party, therefore must be self-enforcing. (Ho?hn) The basis for relational contracts is self-enforcement,

The modern discourse on marriage holds that roles are shifting in many ways within the context of a romantic relationship. In the case of this study, speaking particularly on the subject of heterosexual romantic partnerships, the roles which are assumed by partners are often based on certain preconceptions regarding gender and the social and/or biological distinctions which are a function of gender. Likewise, partners may have certain expectations of

Motivation of workers is posing very big challenges to organizations. Herzberg ensures that an organization rewards its employees depending on the behaviors that the management would like to encourage.One of the widely known writers on motivation of workers is Frederick Herzberg. He is widely known for the two-factor theory that he came up with. The two factor theory is widely referred to as the hygiene motivation theory. As stated above,

Chinese Realty
PAGES 14 WORDS 4295

In addition, repeating ACSI can provide trend data (Hall, 2002, p. 23+), important to government agencies, but also to new industries. Hall notes that, "Besides the ability of the ACSI to maintain a pulse on customer satisfaction, the ACSI is an index, not just a survey. This means it groups all participants and provides an integrated score, or index" (2002, p. 23+). Schay et al. reported that the United States