Religion And Science Are Often Term Paper

Length: 7 pages Sources: 1+ Subject: Mythology - Religion Type: Term Paper Paper: #98794853 Related Topics: Religion And Society, Religion, Religion And Theology, Analogy
Excerpt from Term Paper :

The question should also be specific enough that there would not be a large number of sub-questions that would have to be answered first or that might alter the value of the central question. At the same time, if the question were too narrow, then the researcher might find that it ruled out other possibilities that might emerge. The question also must generate data that tests the hypothesis, and a simple yes or no answer would be too simple for a good research question. The question cannot be such that it raises a question that cannot be quantified, for then the data would not lead to a useful answer or one that would be testable by others. The question must also be formulated so that it is clear to other researchers who may want to test the hypothesis as well or replicate the original research, and the question must be formulated so that it is apparent what the hypothesis is and what the variables are.

The essential Christian myth is the story of Jesus, his life, and especially his death and resurrection. There is no proof of these events beyond what is found in the scriptural accounts, and the myth has to be accepted on faith. There are many scientific models that have been tested and are now accepted as fact. One way certain religious groups fail to understand science is when confronting the word "theory," which in general use is viewed as meaning a guess as to the veracity of a model, while in science it means the model itself. The term is used because the model in science is always to be tested, but so long as the theory proves to be true in every valid test, it is accepted as true. In religion, a doctrine is simply accepted and not tested at all, which is why the term "theory" seems so antithetical to truth.

The conflict often comes to the fore over specific theories, notably the theory of earth, for instance, cited as some 3.5 billion years altogether, while the fundamentalist insists the earth is only some six thousand years old and that this is revealed by a close reading of the Bible. Clearly, the Model for knowledge is different in the two realms. Evolution takes a great deal of time, so those who say there has not been that much time believe they have countered all claims that evolution is fact. Science may line up a mass of evidence on the other side, but none of that matters when faith in a different myth is all the truth that is accepted.

The scientific model has produced a massive body of knowledge and has been tested again and again. When a theory or model fails a test and has to be modified, science does just that. This may take some time, but it has taken place many times. The most notable such shift was from the Ptolemaic vision of the universe as earth-centered to the Copernican model with the sun at the center of the universe. This also involved a shift in thinking from the religious model in which the earth was central because God made it central to a different vision of Creation and of the place of man in the scheme of things. Some Christians accuse non-believers of placing man over God, but they themselves have long placed man at the center of the universe in a way that science does not. On some topics, the two modals are not clearly delineated or cannot be described as different in absolute terms, while on other issues they can. To a great degree, each can be seen as primarily focusing on different realms of knowledge, the spiritual for religion, the concrete for science. Conflicts develop when the realms intersect or when one model tries to explain the are of expertise for the other model. The two approaches use different types of models, but each uses models to create a particular vision of the world and to explain it to others.

Works Cited

Eliade, Mircea. Myth and Reality (Religious Traditions of the World).

Waveland Press; Reprint edition, 1998.

McGrath, Alister E. Science & Religion: An…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Eliade, Mircea. Myth and Reality (Religious Traditions of the World).

Waveland Press; Reprint edition, 1998.

McGrath, Alister E. Science & Religion: An Introduction. New York: Blackwell Publishers, 1998.

Cite this Document:

"Religion And Science Are Often" (2007, September 25) Retrieved December 9, 2021, from

"Religion And Science Are Often" 25 September 2007. Web.9 December. 2021. <>

"Religion And Science Are Often", 25 September 2007, Accessed.9 December. 2021,

Related Documents
Constitutes Religion, Science, Sociology and
Words: 2202 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Business - Law Paper #: 45278706

However, the point of mergence between the two theories has been given a name for itself and it is known as the Overlap Thesis. Overall, the natural law theory of law is used to refer to the analysis of legal systems and philosophical issues of law. Among those who sought that natural law has no valid grounds is Leo Strauss who was convinced that it has to be refused on

Religion and Society Religion Is Defined As
Words: 1752 Length: 4 Pages Topic: Mythology - Religion Paper #: 5730184

Religion and Society Religion is defined as an organized collection of belief systems, views about the universe, or cultural systems that humans use to relate spiritual and moral values to their lives. Many religions have symbols, traditions, and histories that explain the origin of life, the way the universe works, and the moral, ethical and legal ways to organize human life (De Vries, ed., 2008). While the exact origin of religion

Science and Religion: Problem of Other Minds or Lack Thereof
Words: 1079 Length: 3 Pages Topic: Mythology - Religion Paper #: 36691495

Science and Religion Does science discredit religion? In general we have the sense that, historically speaking, it does -- but only because so much of the historical conflict between science and religion has hinged upon the way in which scientific advances have disproved factual claims that were advanced by religion, or (as Worrall phrases it) where religion is "directly inconsistent with well-accredited scientific theories…the erstwhile religious claim…must, from a rational point-of-view,

Religion and Politics Religion Today
Words: 1783 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Mythology - Religion Paper #: 20701483

Examples where religion has become intersected with politics are present throughout the entire history, and in more recent years, include the debates on same sex marriages or on abortion. A more specific look at the relationship between politics and religion has revealed at least three points of intersection -- the role of churches, the evolution of human rights and the emergence and impacts of religious conflicts. In terms of the

Religion As a Positive Force
Words: 445 Length: 1 Pages Topic: Mythology - Religion Paper #: 88404558

While art is certainly a part of culture, other cultural gifts to history mark religion as a positive force. Without the music, ceremony, poetry, and holy books of Muslim, Hindu, and Christian texts, the world would be without significant Beauty. In their own ways, each of these traditions shaped the cultures that would come after them in significant theological, intellectual, and cultural ways. Burhan writes that Islamic influence in the

Religion Shaped AMERICAN& 8230; How Religion
Words: 2067 Length: 8 Pages Topic: Mythology - Religion Paper #: 68756801

Revisionist historian often seek to find non-Christian association among the lives of the founding fathers, such as the Freemasons, and Humanism, yet it is clear that these organizations were not dominant to religion and that a strong Protestant ethic still reigned supreme, especially in the language of the foundational documents of the nation. Fundamentalism Fundamentalism has in fact created a more recent expression in modern America as churches attempt to "go