He was viewing them as little children who required guidance. He tended to believe that the policy of removal had great benefits to the Indians. Majority of the white Americans were thinking that United States was not capable of extending past Mississippi. The removal was capable of saving the Indian nationals from the white's depredations (Foreman 1932). Incorporated in this figure were regiments and battalions both totaling to five (5,145) men who were brought up from the nations of Chickasaw, Cherokee, Seminole, Choctaw, and Creek Nations.
The removal could make them to govern themselves peacefully
It was assumed that the removal was to resettle the Indians in a region where they were capable of governing themselves peacefully. However, a number of Americans viewed this as being a mere excuse for a cruel and appalling course of action, and complained against the removal of the Indian nationals. Their complaints however could not prevent the southeastern populations from being removal. The first lot of people to sign the removal treaty was the Choctaws. They did this in September 1830. A number of them decided to reside in Mississippi (Foreman 1932).
The growing population of the residents of America made the Indians to be removed
The United States' population which expanded swiftly during the 19th century created a lot of tensions with the Indians who were situated within the boundaries of the different states. Although the government did not require sovereign Indian enclaves in the boundaries of the states, there was no need by the Indians to move or to sacrifice their distinctive identities. The land of Cherokee that they lost was tremendously valuable. Due to the growing population, they were in need of land. That forced them also to pay for some pieces of land. The Chickasaw were different from other tribes because they got compensation in the form of cash from the United States for their pieces of land which were lying in the eastward side of Mississippi, the other tribes however exchanged land grants (Foreman 1932).
It is evident that Jackson's justification for the removal of the Indians was in actual sense not justified. This is because the Indians were forcefully removed from their native land with which they had strong cultural attachments. The removal of the Five Civilized Tribes from their native land via the biased and prejudiced Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a serious violation of their legal, human and political rights (Crute 1987)
Violation of political right
The fact that the land and freedom of the Five Civilized Tribes were taken away was a grave violation of their consent. They were made captives when the Indian Removal Act of 1830 gave soldiers the authority to imprison the Five Civilized Tribes in horrible stockades. Their protests through the existing legal systems (courts) were not honored and the court always never favored them. Their voices and desires which they tried to advocate for were blatantly ignored (Corbett 1978)
Violation of legal rights
The fact that the Five Civilized Tribes had their lands grabbed (stolen) through the use of dishonest treaties was a serious violation of their legal rights. They even established treaties with the colonialists that had special guarantees for their residence, peace and privileges. These were however breached as was evident in the letter from Cherokee Chief John Ross who protested to the U.S. Senate as well as House of Representatives of how the various trespassers looted, injured and even murdered members of the Five Civilized Tribes (Gibson 1981)
Violation of human rights
The human rights of the Five Civilized Tribes were seriously violated when they were subjected to inhuman conditions and were deemed subordinate to the rest of the U.S. population. Jackson called them 'savages' and were compared to livestock. They were herded like farm animals and subjected to extremely horrible conditions. Their health deteriorated as a result of the mistreatment and lack of shelter and clothing. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 also denied the Five Civilized Tribes their democratic rights and was a direct violation of their political rights (Gibson 1981)
Crute, Joseph H. Units of the confederate states army. Midlothian, Virginia. Derwent Books .1987
Dunning, William a. Essays on the Civil War and Reconstruction. New York, NY Macmilliam Company, 1898
This article is stating that the consequences of restoration were particularly difficult on the individuals of the Indian Territory, when the territory was becoming a discarding ground by the central government for Indians who came from the entire United States. The Indians were colonized on pieces of land that were forcefully taken from Five Tribes which were colonized through the reconstruction policies. Those who joined the Chickasaw, Cherokees, Creeks, Seminole, and Choctaw tribes were the Wichitas, Delawares, Kickapoos, Poncas, Pawnees, Caddos, Shawnees, Osages among other tribes.
Lindberg, Kip and Matthews, Matt. "To Play a Bold Game: The Battle of Honey Springs" North and South Magazine December 2002: pgs. 56- 61.
The article is stating that in the month of July, the Confederate origin in the Indian Territory met another disaster when their effort to get the Union forces back into Kansas was crushed. Confederate General Douglas Cooper had driven north towards the Texas road to a region that was called Honey Springs. It was situated approximately twenty-six kilometers to the southwestern part of Fort Gibson. The battle that resulted, and the following decrease of Fort Smith, together with the discontinuation of the logistical help of the territory that was on the western side of the Mississippi by the confederation, was an indication of the last momentous Civil War that took place in the Indian Territory.
Gibson, Arrell M. Oklahoma: A History of Five Centuries. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1981
All through the country, the sectionalism of the first half of the nineteenth century had opened many wounds, and certainly three of the southern tribes were no exception. Much of the conflict within the Cherokees, Creeks, and Seminoles dated back to the removal era when some of the people of these tribes favored emigration to the West while others insisted upon remaining on their ancestral lands. Also, at the outbreak of the Civil War, many people within these tribes wanted nothing to do with the states, which had been responsible for their removal, nor did they want to follow the lead of other acculturated members of their tribes who promoted alignment with the Confederacy. Accordingly, heated antagonisms erupted between tribal factions the roots of which were traceable to these ancient, and complex, economic, political, and cultural tensions. Ultimately, these antagonisms resulted in factions from each of these tribes taking opposite sides in the war
Corbett, William P. Confederate Strongholds in Indian Territory: Forts Davis and McCulloch Early Military Forts and Posts in Oklahoma (Oklahoma Historical Society, Oklahoma City, OK 1978): 65-77
The article states that Colonel William Weer of Kansas was placed in command of the Indian Expedition, and on June 1, 1862, began the re-entry into Indian Territory from the Union supply depot at Baxter Springs Kansas. As they marched, the Union invaders followed the Grand River valley into the heart of the Cherokee Nation. Throughout the march, Colonel Watie's cavalry harassed the Union column with hit and run tactics against the unit and its supply lines. Finally, the Union expeditionary force fought with, and defeated Watie's cavalry at Locust Grove on July 3. An excellent source for this battle is found in Annie Heloise Abel's book "The American Indian in the Civil War" (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE 1992). The resulting Confederate defeat at Locust Grove opened up Union approaches to Tahlequah and Fort Gibson at which time Were divided his force, capturing Fort Gibson with one, and the Cherokee capital at Tahlequah with the other.
Forman, Grant. Indian Removal: the Emigration of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians
(415 pp., 14 ill., 6 maps, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1932.)
This article entails a historiographical summary of the movement of the Southeastern Indian tribes which were five in number. They were moving from their previous homes and were heading towards the Indian Territory which was located to the western side of Mississippi. This took place approximately three decades to the end of the last century. The explanation has its basis both on the accounts of the modern newspaper and also on the reports from the government. Notes of ethnographical importance in the data that was gathered were not there. Again, the author is offering not even a single interpretation of the entire material. However, the writer has wonderfully done what he was to do, and the volume that resulted contributes greatly to the frontier history. University of Oklahoma press also ought to be…
Incorporated in this figure were regiments and battalions both totaling to five (5,145) men who were brought up from the nations of Chickasaw, Cherokee, Seminole, Choctaw, and Creek Nations.
Native Americans Before Christopher Columbus discovered the United States of America, and people from all over the globe including Europe, Asia and Africa migrate to inhabit the New World, it was already home to a group of people. This group of people is known as Native Americans or American Indians. These Native Americans lived as hunter-gatherer societies, with tribes living on pieces of lands as a community, using them for agriculture.
Native Americans Transition From Freedom to Isolation America's history since 1865 to date is a remarkable record of various accounts of despair, hope, triumph, and tragedy. The country's history consists of some compelling transformations with one of these significant accounts being the battle between Americans and Americans in the final period of the Civil War. In its initial years, the United States was politically isolated from the rest of the world
Although they reacted with sorrow, they also attempted to preserve their culture. For example, some even ground the bones of their ancestors and sewed them into their clothing (Watson 1999). A similar story of Native American's peaceful reactions that were exploited by force is the history of Chief Joseph. This early recruit to Christianity was the chief mediator of peace between whites and his tribe, the Nez Perce, but when
Native Americans Describe what is known of the tribe's pre-Columbian history, including settlement dates and any known cultural details. Before Columbus came to the "New World," the pre-Columbian era, the Cherokee occupied an area that today is western North Carolina, eastern Tennessee and northern Georgia (Waddington 2006). The Cherokee traveled even further past these areas, however, to hunt and to trade their wares. The Cherokee had occupied this area for a good
While this right applied to American settlers, who engaged in a variety of religions, from Puritanism to Deism, and spoke freely about them in publications and public forums. Native Americans, on the other hand, were denied their freedom of religion. American settlers saw Native American religions as uncivilized, so they encouraged missionaries to convert the tribes. Missionaries can be both beneficial and harmful to a culture. Some come excited
Other Native American tribes did not capitulate so quickly or so easily to the white Settlers, fighting bravely to retain their ancestral territories after the white Settlers had repeatedly and systematically broken treaty after treaty, eventually dispensing altogether with the fiction of "negotiations" and implementing the forced removal of the remaining proud Native American tribes from the "Indian Country" that would soon become known as the "Great Plains" (Anderson,