Resistance To Change Case Study

Organizational Culture & Change Conglomerate, Inc.

According to the organizational model of the ideal workplace culture, positive workplace cultures are humanistic and encouraging; affiliative; achievement-oriented and self-actualizing. Unfortunately, the workplace culture of Conglomerate, Inc. In practice is oppositional, avoidant, and perfectionistic. This suggests that employees feel that they are not treated as valuable assets by management and that managers avoid rather than embrace input from employees. It also suggests that there is little room for a "safe space" for employees to make mistakes to learn, grow, and generate new and potentially valuable ideas. Rather, employees are being held to rigid and unyielding standards that might not be reflective of reality. Workers feel as if they must stifle their real opinions to fit in.

Positive workplace cultures, in contrast, solicit information from employees and create bonds of affiliation between management and all workers. Humanism means instilling a relationship founded upon mentoring and growth rather than upon competition and fear. Of course, competition is a part of most workplaces but the competition should be against one's self, ideally, rather than at the expense of other employees. If workers are pitted against one another in a negative atmosphere, ultimately this is counter-productive to the aims of the larger organization. Significantly, one of the most significant gaps...

...

The rating of the organization in this attribute in actual fact.
The organization must move from its current "Theory X" mode of management to a "Theory Y" motivational mode. According to the theoretical overview of Douglas McGregor, "Theory X assumes that employees are naturally unmotivated and dislike working, and this encourages an authoritarian style of management. According to this view, management must actively intervene to get things done," often by using a "carrot and stick" approach ("Theory X and Theory X," 2014). In contrast, "Theory Y expounds a participative style of management that is de-centralized. It assumes that employees are happy to work, are self-motivated and creative, and enjoy working with greater responsibility" ("Theory X and Theory X," 2014). Theory X approaches tend to use incentives like raises, promotions, and sanctions, assuming that workers can only be motivated by tangible assets. There is little solicitation of input from lower-level employees. In contrast, Theory Y approaches offer workers more pleasant working environments and the ability to shape the future of the organization in a positive way. Theory Y assumes that workers want to make a contribution and strives to create the necessary conditions so they can do so. The organization must move closer to a Theory Y method of doing things even if no workplace can ever be said to completely and purely…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Lewin's change management model. Mind Tools. 12 Oct 2014.

http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_94.htm

Theory X and Theory X Mind Tools. 12 Oct 2014.

http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_74.htm


Cite this Document:

"Resistance To Change" (2014, October 12) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/resistance-to-change-192635

"Resistance To Change" 12 October 2014. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/resistance-to-change-192635>

"Resistance To Change", 12 October 2014, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/resistance-to-change-192635

Related Documents

Resistance to Change: The various analyses regarding resistance to change tend to take the perspective that change agents are usually doing the right thing whereas its recipients establish unreasonable barriers to hinder the occurrence of the change. Consequently, change agents tend to be viewed as undeserving victims of the dysfunctional and absurd reactions of change recipients. Rather than the perspective of change agents as people who develop their environments and realities,

And all staff members will have a chance to sit down and try to understand the aspects of the merger that affect everyone on the general information section of the website. This web-based approach will also allow the company to add more information, as it becomes available. Having a webpage is not a replacement for one-on-one or small group information sessions. In fact, the worst way to announce the restructuring

Resistance to Change Management Why do some employees resist change within the structure of the organization? What can management do to bring those employees along as the company transitions to another strategy? This paper addresses those issues and other related to resistance to change. The Literature on Resistance to Change Management Roy Smollan, senior lecturer in Management at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand, notes that some companies refer to resistance to

Change Management and Resistance My company changed the client management system. There is no formal system for managing client information. Employees will now be required to use one client management system. We need to implement the plan and will create a change management plan. Identify the potential sources of resistance to change and develop strategies to manage resistance to change. We need to choose the appropriate channels to communicate the change

Change Management Organizational Change Organizational change aims at ensuring that the implementation of changes in an organization is smooth and successful. Moreover, it ensures that the benefits of these changes are achievable (Burke 2010). The introduction of social media and technology has recently had much effect on business in the recent past. Accessing information by the organization is easier nowadays thus; the need for introducing changes to business to cope with the

Change Ford, Ford and d'Amelio note that most change literature takes the view that resistance to change is irrational and dysfunctional. If this is the view that is taken by the actual change agents, it is not hard to see that the change agents themselves could be contributing to resistance to change. Resistance cannot always be interpreted as self-serving or irrational (two things that are contradictory, it should be noted). The