Wrongful arrest due to seizure activity in public is a not uncommon complication for individuals with epilepsy and other seizure disorders, not caused by illicit behaviors. There are "2.3 million Americans living with epilepsy," (Guiden, 2003) all of whom at some time have experienced challenges associated with their disease and many of whom have been the victims of wrongful arrest and incarceration.
Yet, it seems that lack of awareness of the signs symptoms and the variety and degree of seizure activity can be the source of arrest and incarceration, that would coincide with those arrests made for such occurrences as drunken disorderly conduct or drug induced dementia. This work will address the problem of wrongful arrests for seizure-related behavior in public, the degree of the problem and some possible solutions to the problem.
In general peoples with seizure disorders have nearly always had to deal with concerns and conflicts associated with seizure activity that occurs in public. Not only do they have to deal with the stigma of the exhibition of uncontrollable behavior, they occasionally have to deal with the lasting effects of wrongful incarceration. Though steps have been taken over the last few years to address this problem, especially since the introduction of the American's With Disabilities Act, there are still many strides to take. "There have been many instances in which persons having seizures have been arrested and charged with such crimes as drunk and disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, unlawful entry, even assault on a police officer. ("Arrest for Seizure-Related Behavior," 2003, http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org/answerplace/Legal/criminaljustice/arrest.cfm)
The Epilepsy Foundation (EF) brought this serious problem to the attention of the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee during hearings on the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). In its final report, the Committee stated: In order to comply with the non-discrimination mandate, it is often necessary to provide training to public employees about disability. For example, persons who have epilepsy, and a variety of other disabilities, are frequently inappropriately arrested and jailed because police officers have not received proper training in the recognition of and aid for seizures. Often, after being arrested, they are deprived of medications while in jail, resulting in further seizures. Such discriminatory treatment based on disability can be avoided by proper training. ("Arrest for Seizure-Related Behavior," 2003, http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org/answerplace/Legal/criminaljustice/arrest.cfm)
In most cases seizure episodes will pass without need for intervention be it medical or otherwise but it is not uncommon for a public unaware of the problem to experience panic and call for assistance.
The visual and physical exhibition of a seizure of almost any type can be very disconcerting for someone who has not been exposed to it in the past and the disorientation that follows a seizure episode can leave an individual unable to clearly explain the problem or their needs. Professional assistance can then cost the individual with an already limiting physical disorder even greater conflict as he or she must then pay for services or in this case prove the medical condition once the episode has passed and the individual is recovering or fully recovered. "Complex partial seizures in particular are often misunderstood by police." ("Epilepsy: Legal Issues," 2001, http://userpages.umbc.edu/~gbryan1/epilepsy/legal.htm)
One particularly troubling issue associated with epilepsy and other seizure disorders is that many people who have these diseases have a further limitation of mobility in that they are often barred from obtaining driver's licenses, even in cases where the disease is medically controlled for long periods of time. Not only does this effect the ability of the individual to work and perform other tasks without conflicts it also exposes the individual to much more time in public situations. The standards for intervention, in some communities can often be troubling as this is yet another location, frequented by persons with seizure disorders that might expose them to possible unneeded and costly medical care or wrongful arrest.
Additionally, there may be challenges for individuals, with what is called a "hidden" disability to use assist animals, on public transportation, a growing trend in care plans for people who tend to have uncontrollable forms of the diseases associated with seizure behaviors. (Mathias, 1997, http://ntl.bts.gov/DOCS/96-0138-7.html) Though, the use of service dogs, despite the potential troubles associated with them could prove to be one of the most valuable additions to the fight to assist patients with seizure disorders in their ability to function more normally within their culture. Service dogs can act as an intermediary to seek help when it is really needed and provide basic information to witnesses and authorities with regard to the needs of the patient, experiencing seizure...
That on June 5, 2005, Mr. A did willingly state that the robbery was perpetrated by Mr. A on June 3, 2005, and that Mr. A is in possession of the additional items taken as proceeds of the robbery. The proceeds are located in the bedroom at Mr. a's home, located at 678 Oak Street, Collingswood. That based upon the above, I believe there exists probable cause to believe there are
search and seizure laws. The writer uses several cases to present a detailed exploration of search and seizure laws and how the courts rule when they are challenged. There were five sources used to complete this paper. The Constitution of the United States provides protection from illegal search and seizures through the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment is written in such a way that it can be vague when it
Fourth Amendment states that law enforcement officers need to receive permission from a legal authority in order to be able to look for evidence or seize objects that might contribute to providing information concerning a criminal act. The context of the amendment and the process of incorporation mean that it can only protect individuals when government officials are involved. It does not protect people in a situation concerning private
Drug Task Force During the investigative process for a suspected drug-related criminal organization, a judge has issued a wiretap order for a suspect's phone. I have been assigned the responsibility of monitoring the suspect's phone conversations. During the course of such monitoring, I have heard the suspect and other individuals, who may or may not be involved in the drug ring, discussing other types of criminal activity. I have to decide
During the 1960's and 1970's, violent contact with the police, resulting in force occurred during anti-war, labor and civil rights demonstrations, during a politically tumultuous time. It is safe to conclude that excessive force was used during these clashes. Deaths and injuries were the results of political clashes at the Republican Convention in Chicago, during campus riots held at several universities, during political demonstrations held in public places and in
Crime Control/Procedures The term "play in the joints" refers to flexibility within the law that allows for a certain amount of discretion to occur within the prosecution and judge. Even though there is discretion within the manner in which the Judge may interpret sentencing, procedure and rulings, there are still formal rules of law that provide for a basis for upholding the Constitution. In a given situation, for example, the Judge
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now