Shelley's Frankenstein Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1367
Cite

Frankenstein "You, who call Frankenstein your friend, seem to have a knowledge of my crimes and his misfortunes. But in the detail which he gave you of them he could not sum up the hours and months of misery which I endured wasting in impotent passions. For while I destroyed his hopes, I did not satisfy my own desires," (Shelley, Frankenstein, Chapter 24)

Frankenstein's monster remains one of the most misunderstood characters in English literature. Part of the problem can be traced to the commercialization of the book and its adaptation for cinema. As Mary Shelley's work has been appropriated by the horror genre, the monster has taken on a new form as an evil and fearsome creature rather than being the tragic and lonely figure that he actually is in the novel. Film versions of Frankenstein have stripped away from the monster some of the core components of his ironic humanity: including his emotional sensitivity, his eloquence, and his ultimate persuasiveness in warning readers about the pitfalls of egotistical power. Part of the reason that filmmakers have transformed the monster into something mute and inarticulate has been to simplify the moral messages in Shelley's book. Shelley's novel is morally complex, but Hollywood has tended to veer from moral ambiguity to portray a (often literally) black-and-white version of the story on the silver screen. Another reason why filmmakers have distorted the story of Frankenstein and his monster is to attempt to squeeze a dystopian novel into a horror genre. A close reading and revisiting of Shelley's original text, coupled with an analysis of literary criticism, reveals that the reader is encouraged to sympathize fully with the creature even while simultaneously feeling compassion for his creator.

The title of Shelley's novel is Frankenstein, drawing the reader's attention immediately to the doctor. Thus, the monster has become linked to the name of his "father," and in popular culture the monster is called Frankenstein erroneously. Focusing on the doctor, the tale of Frankenstein becomes less about the monster's plight as a lonely being in a hostile world, and becomes more about the sudden shock of...

...

More than being about the pitfalls of science, Frankenstein is about people who should not become parents or about the modern tendency toward self-centeredness and narcissism. As Johnson puts it, Frankenstein is about the "monstrousness of selfhood," (3).
Perhaps Dr. Frankenstein's fear of his creation is repressed homoeroticism-turned-homophobia. As Laplace-Sinatra points out, the sexual politics of Frankenstein are difficult to ignore, as the tension between the creator and created becomes a pained and qualitatively Romantic homoerotic journey. "Yes, he had followed me in my travels; he had loitered in forests, hid himself in caves, or taken refuge in wide and desert heaths; and he now came to mark my progress and claim the fulfilment of my promise," (Chapter 20). Using a gendered analysis of Frankenstein, it is easy to sympathize with the monster as being a symbol for the spurned lover returning to claim his love. This is especially true in light of the monster's inability to tolerate Victor's marriage. It also becomes possible to view the creature as being perennially motherless, something that presents the monster with a unique set of psychological baggage. "The creature's nonbirth, occluding an unavoidably female act, has dominated feminist interpretations of Frankenstein," (Yousef 197). Elements of motherhood, gender, sexuality, and personal identity are central to the human experience, which is why the creature becomes increasingly sympathetic the more Shelley explores these themes.

Because the monster takes over the second half of the narrative, it is his eloquence and persuasiveness that leave the most indelible impression on the reader. The book ceases to be about Frankenstein the creator, and becomes about Frankenstein's creation: the nameless, motherless creature who wanders the cold and desolate planet on its own. Only a visually impaired old man has the ability to perceive and treat the monster as human. When the old man calls him "human," the monster does not…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Hammond, Kim. "Monsters of Modernity: Frankenstein and Modern Environmentalism." Cultural Geographies 11(2). April 2004.

Johnson, Barbara. "My Monster/My Self." Diacritics. Vol. 12, No. 2.

Laplace-Sinatra, Michael. "Science, Gender and Otherness in Shelley's Frankenstein and Kenneth Brannagh's Film Adaptation." European Romantic Review. Vol 9, Issue 2. 1998.

Picart, Caroline Joan S. Remaking the Frankenstein Myth on Film. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.
Shelly, Mary Wollstonecraft. Frankenstein: Or the Modern Prometheus. Project Gutenberg eBook, retrieved online: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/84/84-h/84-h.htm


Cite this Document:

"Shelley's Frankenstein" (2014, March 11) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/shelley-frankenstein-184827

"Shelley's Frankenstein" 11 March 2014. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/shelley-frankenstein-184827>

"Shelley's Frankenstein", 11 March 2014, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/shelley-frankenstein-184827

Related Documents

Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, Charles Darwin, Origin of Species There are many themes which readers can discern in Mary Shelley's inestimable work of literature, Frankenstein. They include the virtues of humanity vs. The vices of monstrosity, the power and effect of family and "community" (Bentley 325), as well as the considerable ramifications of ambition and work. However, the prudent reader will perceive that the principle motif unifying all of these themes, and

My attention was fixed upon every object the most insupportable to the delicacy of the human feelings. (Shelley, 1961, p. 44) Frankenstein challenges the values of man that are based on fear and thus goes forward to create a beast that even Dante could not have conceived of. (Shelley, 1961, p. 50) He then chases the beast to his own death. The Beast on the other hand exemplifies a helpless child

Her list includes the following: culture / Nature reason / Nature male/female mind/body ( Nature) master/slave reason/matter (physicality) rationality/animality ( Nature) human / Nature (non-human) civilised/primitive ( Nature) production/reproduction ( Nature) self/other At first glance, this list seems to capture the basic groupings and gender associations that are at work in Mary Shelley's novel. The Creature exemplifies animality, primitiveness, and physicality, whereas Victor represents the forces of civilization, rational production, and culture. Victor is part of a happy family

What Victor is saying is that in order to create a living being from the dead, he must haunt the graveyards like a human ghoul and experiment on live animals to "animate" "lifeless clay," being the deceased remains of human beings. From this admission, it is abundantly obvious that Victor, like Prometheus, sees "clay" as the foundation for creation, a substance which is part of the earth itself and

Frankenstein-Movie Reading about cloning is very disturbing. Scientists should not try to play God. Messing with the natural cause of life can have unforeseen consequences. They should remember the classic novel by Mary Shelley "Frankenstein." Its premise also explores the theme of creating a living thing. Though Frankenstein is not about cloning, its theme is similar to the events related to cloning. This movie is not attempting to be a horror movie.

Frankenstein in the Work of Mary Shelley FRANKENSTEIN BY MARY SHELLEY The focus of this study is to summarize chapters 16 through 20 in Mary Shelley's and to choose two to three particularly meaningful quotes or quotes that are provocative or significant. work entitled 'Frankenstein'. Chapter 16 opens with the exclamation of "cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live?" (Shelley) This exclamation importantly sweets the scene for the dilemma in this story