Should Elected Public Officials Be Intelligence Tested Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
635
Cite

Intelligence testing should not be required for candidates prior to running for public office. Firstly, the assumption that higher traditional measures of intelligence will result in better governance is highly debatable and flawed. Second, the ability to govern may be better determined by a measurement of emotional intelligence, rather than standard IQ measurements. Third, moral character may be a better measure of the ability to govern than intelligence.

Americans often complain that the nature of our democratic government leads to the election of individuals whose intelligence levels leave a great deal to be desired. Clearly, the actions of a great many public officials give credence to this claim. We have only to think of the, the indiscreet and inappropriate sexual shenanigans of Gary Hart, and the infamous inability of Dan Quayle to spell potato correctly as evidence of this assertion. In response to these criticisms, many Americans have begun to push for mandatory intelligence testing of candidates before running...

...

In response, a new intelligence test was created. The new test is free of bias toward specific ethnic groups or ages. In addition, it is an accurate measure of four main areas of intelligence: reasoning power; creative thought; memory; and understanding.
At the basis of the argument for intelligence testing for public officials is the dubious assumption that higher intelligence results in better governance. While this may seem intuitively correct, there is certainly little concrete evidence that high intelligence automatically equates with high performance. On an individual level, all we have to do is look back on the after-school accomplishments of the brightest and most accomplished individuals that we knew in high school or college. Most people can note numerous examples of highly intelligent people that for some reason or another failed to live up to…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Gardner, Howard. Frames of Mind. New York: Basic Book Inc., 1983.


Cite this Document:

"Should Elected Public Officials Be Intelligence Tested" (2003, January 10) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/should-elected-public-officials-be-intelligence-142059

"Should Elected Public Officials Be Intelligence Tested" 10 January 2003. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/should-elected-public-officials-be-intelligence-142059>

"Should Elected Public Officials Be Intelligence Tested", 10 January 2003, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/should-elected-public-officials-be-intelligence-142059

Related Documents

Sometimes, it is even necessary to carry out certain clandestine operations like deceptions, clandestine collection of information, covert actions, and also the carrying out of the exercise of distributing disinformation or misleading information, which would mislead the suspected threat. The United States Intelligence Community is, as stated earlier, made up a number of different agencies. The Central Intelligence Agency is one of these. Also known popularly as the CIA, this

" (p. 1) As we can see here, researchers are likely to differ considerably in the way that they assess or prioritize competencies. But there does tend to be a certain consensus on the idea that certain overlapping emotional qualities may be used to project one's occupational capacity and propensities. The source by Cherniss goes on to identify certain behavioral features that are most typically found in those with high levels

Emergency Management Disasters are political occurrences; they can either destroy or glorify politicians. The spectacular temperament of disasters calls for the involvement of these chief executives and they test their leadership merits. How politicians control these rare occurrences can frame how their whole term in office receive judgments. During his last White House Press Conference, President George W. Bush was asked about the mistake he made during his reign, and among

66). Furthermore, social software will only increase in importance in helping organizations maintain and manage their domains of knowledge and information. When networks are enabled and flourish, their value to all users and to the organization increases as well. That increase in value is typically nonlinear, where some additions yield more than proportionate values to the organization (McCluskey and Korobow, 2009). Some of the key characteristics of social software applications

Most conclusions on this approach were vague or indecisive in terms of social, psychological or mental significance (Rice, 1978, 1981; Graen et al., 1972; Ashour, 1973). Furthermore, over the years, many scholars have come to the realization that leadership is situational and hence there are many realistic settings like the environment, the employees, the resources, etc. that determine the characteristics needed in a leader as well as his/her business approach

The line of legitimacy, separating socially approvable use of force from violence, cannot be effectively drawn without an agreement on what constitutes the optimum amount of force necessary to maintain social order and to protect human rights against encroachment. A society subscribing to infinite morality which condemns all use of force as immoral is doomed no less than a society accepting the absolute pragmatism of tyrants. " As Oleg Zinam