Should We Require Labeling For Genetically Modified Food  Article Review

PAGES
3
WORDS
837
Cite

¶ … United States and around the globe on the use of Genetically Engineered Food (GEF) indicate the rate at which people are very worried about GEF. According to Bereano (20011, pg. 279) we have different cultural and religion background which most occasions used to determine the kind of food we eat. There are a good number of people who are vegetarians who are required to know what they eat, whether it contains meat contents. Muslins and Hindus too do not eat pork or any kind of food which has pork has one of the ingredients. Most importantly, the opinion poll has showed that many consumers do not trust GEF and therefore they need to be labeled in the market to give consumers a choice whether to buy GEF or other food. However, an attempt by the government to stop the labeling of genetically engineered food (GEF) is like taking away the right of consumers to make a choice and speak. As stated by Bereano (2011, pg. 276) in general genetically engineered food are meant to benefit corporate and not consumers. In this case, a number of people who have an allergy against certain products must exercise their rights to know what they eat. Again, under the food and drugs administration rules, the agency has no power to access...

...

This argument does not take in consideration the process and circumstances under which the two products are produced. When you look at our food staffs on shelves around our shopping malls, you will realize that there is certain label which shows whether a particular food is organic or nonorganic. The Genetically Engineered Food (GEF) should be labeled to provide consumers with a choice on what to buy.
Labeled Genetically Engineered Food

Bereano (2011, pg. 286) noted whether labeling Genetically Engineered Food (GEF) is mandatory or volunteer, it's very controversial and under section 403 of FD&A act which requires all the food to be labeled before it's taken to the market. All the food whether natural or GEF, should be labeled before they are put on our shelves. This to protect the consumer and allow them to understand the kind of food stuff they buy from malls because I believe it's the right of consumers to know what they…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Newton, Lisa, Elaine Englehardt, and Michael Pritchard, Taking Side; Clashing Views on Business Ethics and Society, 12th Ed., (McGraw-Hill, NY, 2012) ISBN 978-0-07-352735-2)


Cite this Document:

"Should We Require Labeling For Genetically Modified Food " (2012, September 19) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/should-we-require-labeling-for-genetically-108818

"Should We Require Labeling For Genetically Modified Food " 19 September 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/should-we-require-labeling-for-genetically-108818>

"Should We Require Labeling For Genetically Modified Food ", 19 September 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/should-we-require-labeling-for-genetically-108818

Related Documents

GMO Food Labeling Genetically modified foods (genetically modified foods) have been an issue of controversy since their early development. genetically modified foods refer to organisms that are intended for human or animal consumption that have been modified artificially to enhance certain plant traits. Some of these traits include pesticide resistance, herbicide tolerance, disease resistance, cold tolerance, drought tolerance, salinity tolerance, improved nutrition, pharmaceuticals, and phytoremediation, which is the use of plants

Genetically Modified Foods What are Genetically Modified Foods? Genetically modified foods (GMF) are created through a biotechnological process known as genetic modification (GM). Genetic modification -- also known as genetic engineering -- alters the genetic makeup of plants, according to the Human Genome Project (HGP). Actually what scientists are doing when they genetically modify a plant is to combine certain genes from different plant species to basically change the DNA in the

Utilitarianism John Stuart Mill believed in the subjugation of individual interests for the sake of society as a whole, but only when necessary. Of course, determining when such subjugation is necessary is not at all simple, and this is the task in which Mill distinguished himself as a philosopher. In his treatise on moral philosophy, "Utilitarianism," Mill proposed the "greatest-happiness principle" a sort of pseudo-mathematical, economic equation to determine the desirability

Protection and preservation of the environment through increased yields and reduced use of chemical pesticides and herbicides. This is because genetically modified foods grow at a faster rate and in bigger quantities which means less forest land is cleared for agriculture and the natural habitats and biodiversity is preserved. The crops are also made pest and disease resistant which means that less pesticides and herbicides are used which could pollute

Then in May 2000, honey on sale in supermarkets was found to be contaminated with GM pollen from British crop trials. Two out of nine samples show contamination" (Chapman 2006:5). The results of an analysis by Fox (1999) confirmed this cross-contamination of pollen: "The pollen produced by these plants, carrying new genes, cannot be contained. As a result, genetic pollution of natural crop varieties and of wild plant relatives

One of the most interesting articles, "Genetic Engineering Risks," really described the issue with GMOs: the difference between genetically engineered organisms and their non-engineered counterparts is usually just one gene or a handful of genes and genetically engineered organisms have new genes that are put into their DNA using molecular technology; they would not have been able to do this with traditional breeding methods. "Because such a small fraction of