Slippery Slope Argument Is An Argument That Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
414
Cite

¶ … slippery slope argument is an argument that explains why it is best to err on the side of caution when an issue can become volatile if allowed to expand. The slippery slope argument is used to describe what can happen if the ball is allowed to roll on any controversial issue. To understand how it would work in the Euthanasia debate one must first understand how the term came about. When one stands at the top of a hill, and begins to go down a slippery slope there is a chance that the person will lose their footing. Once that happens the person begins to gain momentum and often times bypasses the originally desired stopping point and ends up at...

...

Through assisted suicide, or the injection of medically provided drugs those who are terminally ill make the decision to die. At first glance this sounds like a fair idea. Why should one who is terminally ill…

Cite this Document:

"Slippery Slope Argument Is An Argument That" (2002, November 19) Retrieved April 24, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/slippery-slope-argument-is-an-argument-that-139189

"Slippery Slope Argument Is An Argument That" 19 November 2002. Web.24 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/slippery-slope-argument-is-an-argument-that-139189>

"Slippery Slope Argument Is An Argument That", 19 November 2002, Accessed.24 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/slippery-slope-argument-is-an-argument-that-139189

Related Documents

Slippery Slope Law / Discrimination The definition of the slope and its legal implications are largely hypothetical. According to Eugene Volokh, an action that is voted in -- say a ban on guns provides with the curtailment of many other things -- like confiscation of guns, costs or data bases and many other legislations that flows into creating a system that was not envisaged in the first place or would have

Fallacies Logical Fallacies Slippery slope is a logical fallacy where one event is said to lead to another event, which in turn leads to another event, which in turn has significant consequences. For example, a person might argue that if one person is given a pay rise, everyone else will expect a pay rise, and that everyone will expect continual pay rises, and that the organization will go bankrupt. The fallacy occurs

Introduction Physician-assisted suicide, or physician-assisted death, refers to “the process that allows terminally ill adults to request from their physician, receive from their pharmacist, and take a lethal dose of medication to end their life,” (Death with Dignity, n.d.). Although seemingly similar to euthanasia, physician-assisted death is different in that it tends to refer to situations where the patient does not act with autonomy. Physician-assisted death is still controversial and is

Brain-Death Arguments upon brain-death Technology, a very familiar phenomenon of modern world, is continuously enhancing its ways towards comforts and luxuries. New thoughts and ideas are coming with every passing second, and what started as only a blurred vision; now became a necessity for all mankind and the entire society is involved in these technological reforms. The main notion behind creating & inventing all such equipments was to actually make the living

Court Was Correct: Silva Deserves to Teach Exordium: OJ Simpson was one thing; this time, the courts got it right. Professor Silva used questionable teaching methods, yes, but the federal court's decision was correct: Any possible improprieties did not amount to sexual harassment, and indeed fell into the category of protected speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. As a result, exonerating Silva and reinstituting him with pay

Conclusion: Homosexual marriage is a controversial topic because it conflicts with our traditional cultural definition of the institution of marriage. It is easy to understand the reasons that many are opposed to legalizing gay marriage, but somewhat harder to understand the justification offered for imposing those reasons on other individuals who may not necessarily share their beliefs. In many respects, once one examines the specific objections, it becomes hard to distinguish