Sociology Of Deviant Behavior Violence, Term Paper

In this example, it becomes evident that Anderson's underlying theory in conducting his analysis is the labeling theory. A product of the symbolic interactionist paradigm, labeling theory posits that "a response to an act and not the behavior that determines deviance...(it) is the recognition that some people or groups have the power to define labels and apply them to others" (Schaefer, 1998:165). From this definition, Anderson's categorization of street people corresponds to the people's behavior and actions as they live a life of poverty. For the "criminal elements" of the society, deviance is a form of legitimacy for them to conduct more deviant acts, and thus, the continuous conduct of deviant actions reinforces the label "criminal element(s)." Similarly, there exist labels that determine people who lead double identities of being able to assimilate to both the normative and deviant groups. By resorting to "decent ways" of living, Anderson considers some street people as non-deviants; however there also times when the community proves to be more influential than the individual, thus, s/he adapts deviant behavior or "indecent ways" of living.

Anderson elucidates on these important points on labeling theory by stating in his discussion of street life as follows: "...labels are used by residents of inner-city communities to characterize themselves and one another...Most residents are decent or are...

...

The same family is likely to have members who are strongly oriented toward decency and civility... A person may behave according to either set of rules, depending on the situation" (36). On a more general level, it is also noticeable that the author clearly distinguishes between people susceptible and not susceptible to street life -- that is, the "winners," who live a comfortable life, and the "losers," people who live in poverty (37). From these categories, conflict theory also emerges, wherein poor people are being dominated and considered inferior compared to the "winners," or those who have experienced relative wealth, comfort, and social integration in life. Anderson's analysis is parallel with the argument of conflict theory of deviance, wherein "people with power protect their own interests and define deviance to suit their own needs... (social control) is often an attempt by the powerful to coerce others" (Schaefer, 1998:166). In effect, Anderson's analysis of street life and deviant behavior in this sector of the society provides two perspectives in understanding the dynamics of deviance in society -- that is, through the perspectives of conflict and labeling theories.
Bibliography

Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of inner city. NY W.W. Norton.

Schaefer, R. (1998). Sociology: a brief introduction. NY: McGraw-Hill Co.

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of inner city. NY W.W. Norton.

Schaefer, R. (1998). Sociology: a brief introduction. NY: McGraw-Hill Co.


Cite this Document:

"Sociology Of Deviant Behavior Violence " (2004, November 20) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-of-deviant-behavior-violence-58726

"Sociology Of Deviant Behavior Violence " 20 November 2004. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-of-deviant-behavior-violence-58726>

"Sociology Of Deviant Behavior Violence ", 20 November 2004, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/sociology-of-deviant-behavior-violence-58726

Related Documents

All of these theories represent an idea that deviance is a socially constructed phenomenon, not an objectively defined part of reality. The fourth chapter of Thio's work talks about specific forms of violence. These forms, killing, assault, and terrorism, are all examined under the microscope of different theories to help explain their existence and popularity among certain groups of people and individuals. This chapter is quite intriguing because it gives

11). Perhaps the most major and identifiable sociological theorist is Emile Durkheim. He literally helped formulate the ideas and theories of modern sociology, and many of the criminal justice theories are based on his ideas. Durkheim developed many of the modern theories of criminality, such as cultural disintegration, which can lead to an individual's gradual disassociation from society, with no bonds or commitments to a society that is dissolving around

Sociology: Changing Societies in a Diverse World (Fourth Edition) George J. Bryjak & Michael P. Soroka Chapter One Summary of Key Concepts Sociology is the field of study which seeks to "describe, explain, and predict human social patterns" from a scientific perspective. And though Sociology is part of the social sciences (such as psychology and anthropology), it is quite set apart from the other disciplines in social science; that is because it emphasizes

In this view, the fact that underprivileged subcultures already promoted a different set of social values emphasizing "street smarts" and toughness instead of socially productive attributes and goals combined with the substitution of deviant role models for father figures is a significant source of criminal conduct, particularly in poor communities (Adler, Mueller & Laufer, 2008). Other modern sociological perspectives began reconsidering crime and other forms of socially deviant behavior as

There are a variety of theoretical explanations that have been put forward to explain female abuse and violent crimes against women. These include feminist and gender theories and extend to theories of genetic pathology. However, in the criminological literature a distinction is made between two categories of explanation. On the one hand, there are theories that tend to focus on individual pathology and forms of deviance that can lead to these

Sociology of Culture
PAGES 2 WORDS 687

Elijah Anderson's "The Code of the Streets," he introduces the idea that violence, aggression, stealing, and other socially deviant behaviors are not perceived as infractions of rules, but rather conforming to a different standard, a different set of rules. (Anderson, p. 154) Anderson does an adequate job of setting forth his ideas, along with providing sufficient evidence to support them. However, it is Anderson's detailed description of "decent" and