Comparative Analysis
1. What policy do you recommend for your home state? How would your policy recommendation address the problem in your state? Provide rationale for your recommendations.
The recommended policy for my home state is the formation of high-quality training and orientation programs for new teachers, necessitating the different districts within the state to offer such programs and also offering finances to support the programs. This policy would address the problem in the state for the reason that beginning teachers that have the accessibility to rigorous and exhaustive mentoring by expert peers have a considerably less likelihood of deserting teaching in the initial years. It will be possible to diminish the rates of attrition of the new teachers by a substantial figure through the connection of the new teachers with specialized mentors and offering both parties with mutual release time. In addition, this policy is beneficial because these programs not only aid in encourage new teachers to remain within the teaching profession, but also facilitate them to become proficient in a faster manner (Scherer, 2003).
2. Would your recommendation likely pass the state legislature and be supported by the governor in your state? If so, why? If not, why do you anticipate a lack of support with this initiative?
This recommendation would likely pass the state legislature and obtain support by the state governor. This is owing to two key reasons. First, this recommendation does not advocate for the development of programs that solely fascinate and appeal to increased candidates to the profession and hastily prepare them to enter the classroom. Therefore no valuable resources are wasted and the level of education obtained by the children is not compromised in terms of quality. Secondly, the recommended policy addresses the issue of high teacher turnover, which facilitates the resolution of teacher shortage (Scherer, 2003).
3. What will be required at the local government levels to implement this policy? Why are these actions necessary?
What will be required at the local government level in order to carry out this policy is to guarantee the coordination of district schools. This is imperative for the reason that the programs will be undertaken at the district level.
4. How will this policy initiative be funded? Federal? State? Or both? Will federal grants or waivers need to be acquired? If so, which types of grants would be necessary to implement this policy change?
This policy will be funded by both the federal and state means. Such funding will thereafter be disseminated to the various districts that will be responsible for undertaking the programs recommended for solving teacher shortage.
5. Predict whether or not this policy would be supported by the public.
My prediction is that this policy would without a doubt be supported by the public. This is for the reason that the general public largely considers two aspects, which are quality of education and level of funding necessitated. The recommended policy makes certain that the programs are not hastened and therefore the quality is not comprised and also the funding required for such mentoring and training are not put to waste and are not substantial.
6. Based on state election and voting patterns, predict how your policy recommendation will fare in your home state.
Owing to the fact that the state elections and voting patterns of the state lean toward the republican side, it is predicted that the policy recommendation will not fare well owing to the reason that the republicans have a preference of decreased training and greater requirements of obtaining a teacher license (Lassa, 2018).
7. Based on the institutional rules in your home state, predict how your policy recommendation will fare in this region.
However, based on institutional rules within my homes state, it is predicted that the policy recommendation will be embraced by educational establishments and the teachers within the profession.
References
Lassa, J. (2018). Teacher Appreciation and Wisconsin's Teacher Shortage. Retrieved from: https://legis.wisconsin.gov/senate/lassa/PressReleases/Pages/Teacher-Appreciation-and-Teacher-Shortage.aspx
Scherer, M. (Ed.). (2003). Keeping good teachers. ASCD.
You’re 100% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.