Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
State vs. Private Prison
The United States prison system is designed to ensure that the members of society who have chosen to violate the law and commit crimes are suitably punished. Prisoners are sent away for a period of time based on the crime committed and the severity of that crime. Additional factors such as age, mental and emotional state, and motive may have a contribution to the sentencing of the prisoner. The prison system is comprised of both state-funded institutions and those run and controlled by private funding. Both forms of institutions serve the same inherent function, to punish those who have committed crimes and to rehabilitate the offenders so that they can be released back into society without posing a potential threat to other law-abiding citizens. Those who cannot be rehabilitated will either be executed by the state or sent to prison for a life sentence. However, there are differences between private and public penitentiaries, both in the implementation of punishment and in the reformation of criminals which differentiate the two types of prisons.
Privatization has become an important role in many aspects of prison life, both while the convicted individual is within prison and afterwards when they are on probation (Siegel 546). In the current economy, many states have had to shut down publicly-owned facilities...
Many times this results in the early probation of criminals before they have served their full sentences, as well as a decrease in the level of care and observation during the probationary period of the former convict. In such instances, private corporations and entities take over existing penitentiary structures or construct new ones to alleviate the overcrowded prison system and ensure the situation does not become worse because of the shutdown (Zito).
Most privatized prisons in the United States operate mostly to deal with crimes involving drugs and alcohol. Rather than put a criminal in a traditional prison, the individual can be placed in a rehabilitation center where they have most of the same restrictions as a regular penitentiary. This is also true of institutions for the criminally insane, individuals who are guilty of crime but have been found to possess diminished mental capacity. Rather than go to prison, these individuals are placed in a secure medical facility where they can be more closely monitored by staff. The thesis is that these individuals are not responsible for criminal activity for any reason other than a dependency of drugs or because of their mental states. Given a more restrictive environment where they will not have access to drugs or alcohol, or where their mental…
Works Cited:
Levine, D.M. "What's Costlier than a Government Run Prison? A Private One." Fortune. 2010.
Print.
"Private Privatization and the Use of Incarceration." The Sentencing Project. 2004. Print.
Siegel, Larry J., and Joseph J. Senna. Introduction to Criminal Justice. Belmont, CA:
http://www.ifpo.org/articlebank/prison_privatization.html
'" Two steps if taken, however, would almost halve our prison population. First, repeal state laws that now mandate the incarceration of drug offenders and develop instead many more public and private treatment centers to which nonviolent drug abusers can be referred. Second, stop using jails or prisons to house the mentally ill. Tougher sentencing is being justified, in part, by the widespread belief that incarceration is the chief reason violent crime
Prison Reform The United States criminal justice system houses the largest prison population in the world; both in terms of the total prison population as well as the proportion of prisoners to the total population (per capita). The United States has a bigger prison population than China and India despite having nowhere near the total population. It also holds a greater percentage of its population in incarceration than any other country
Prison Privatization Privatization of prisons Privatization of prisons is referred as a way of taking over the existing public amenities or facilities by the private operators, building of new operations and additional prisons by for profit prison sectors. Private prisons are more safe, efficient and effective compared to the public sector prisons. This is because; the public sector prisons are wasteful in terms of money that is spent more than the available
Privatization of Prison Privatization Privatization of the prisons stands out as an objective by the government to change or extend its obligation in running prisons. Change in this operation calls for state policy changes where the government contracts private operators in elements relating to construction, design and security of prisons. In some states, some private companies undertake full ownership of the prisons inviting the government to evaluate the facility and offer to
Overhaul of Our Prison System Needed Most people credit increased incarceration with reduced crime (5). Prison growth has skyrocketed (5). Prison costs have skyrocketed (1) Large numbers of mentally ill in U.S. prisons (3). overcrowding, failure to protect both adults and juveniles, has not reduced crime rate, increased recidivism. Overcrowding statistics on problem Three strikes and you're out rule Drug laws have caused increase in inmates increased sentence length Unrealistic expectations Political consequences if this pattern is challenged Affect areas of society
During times where they are not needed, this would be a waste of resources. Instead, a PMC is there when the military needs it, and when the mission is over, the military no longer has to spend resources to maintain their personnel. Another benefit, although this is also the source of many ethical challenges as will be discussed later, is a PMC's ability to operate more freely than a state's