Statute Of Limitations Legal Research Term Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
870
Cite

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

LEGAL RESEARCH

INTRODUCTION

The legal phrase: "Statute of Limitations' is one used in legal terminology to refer to the length of time allowed by law to enter into the court for settlement of a matter or prosecution of a crime. This amount of time varies dependent upon the legal issue's specific details. This research has been guided by exploration and research into the statute of limitations or the time allowed to criminally prosecute or for civil action to be taken against these offenders. The research herein is based on the laws of the separate U.S. states and the collective opinions of those states. Considerations for this opinion include the fact that those committing such heinous crimes against children are not known to simply stop committing these offenses and require punishment, treatment and sadly, in many cases lifetime-monitoring is necessary. Whether or not these laws should be relaxed in the case of catholic priest offenders is looked at in this research as to the general opinion of whether they should be held liable in a civil court for the commission of these offenses.

CRIIMINAL PROSECUTION OF SEXUAL OFFENDERS

Differing opinions exist among the...

...

As to the statute of limitations or the length of time after the commission of the crime of a sexual offense has occurred. For instance the state of Alabama state code states that no period of limitations exists for prosecuting this offense or in other words that there is no statute of limitation placed by rule of court as to how long the state has to seek prosecution against a sexual offender. [Kirby v. State, 500 So.2d 79 (1986); as cited by the NCSL, 2006] In comparison the state of Alaska states the statute of limitations to be a period of ten (10) years following this specific offense. (Alaska Statute 12.10.01) Differing again Kansas states a five (5) year statute of limitations in sexual assault cases. (KSA 21-3106) Virginia agrees with the former state that there is no statute of limitations on criminal prosecution of sexual offenses. The state of Delaware allows for prosecution of any class 'A' felony to be commenced "at any time." (NCSL, 2006) Just as in the state of Alabama the state of Connecticut has no 'statute' that limits the length of time allowed for seeking prosecution of this type of crime. (NCSL, 2006) Indiana, Kentucky and Louisiana all agree that there is no bar to seeking legal relief through the criminal court venue

Sources Used in Documents:

The legal phrase: "Statute of Limitations' is one used in legal terminology to refer to the length of time allowed by law to enter into the court for settlement of a matter or prosecution of a crime. This amount of time varies dependent upon the legal issue's specific details. This research has been guided by exploration and research into the statute of limitations or the time allowed to criminally prosecute or for civil action to be taken against these offenders. The research herein is based on the laws of the separate U.S. states and the collective opinions of those states. Considerations for this opinion include the fact that those committing such heinous crimes against children are not known to simply stop committing these offenses and require punishment, treatment and sadly, in many cases lifetime-monitoring is necessary. Whether or not these laws should be relaxed in the case of catholic priest offenders is looked at in this research as to the general opinion of whether they should be held liable in a civil court for the commission of these offenses.

CRIIMINAL PROSECUTION OF SEXUAL OFFENDERS

Differing opinions exist among the states of the U.S. As to the statute of limitations or the length of time after the commission of the crime of a sexual offense has occurred. For instance the state of Alabama state code states that no period of limitations exists for prosecuting this offense or in other words that there is no statute of limitation placed by rule of court as to how long the state has to seek prosecution against a sexual offender. [Kirby v. State, 500 So.2d 79 (1986); as cited by the NCSL, 2006] In comparison the state of Alaska states the statute of limitations to be a period of ten (10) years following this specific offense. (Alaska Statute 12.10.01) Differing again Kansas states a five (5) year statute of limitations in sexual assault cases. (KSA 21-3106) Virginia agrees with the former state that there is no statute of limitations on criminal prosecution of sexual offenses. The state of Delaware allows for prosecution of any class 'A' felony to be commenced "at any time." (NCSL, 2006) Just as in the state of Alabama the state of Connecticut has no 'statute' that limits the length of time allowed for seeking prosecution of this type of crime. (NCSL, 2006) Indiana, Kentucky and Louisiana all agree that there is no bar to seeking legal relief through the criminal court venue


Cite this Document:

"Statute Of Limitations Legal Research" (2006, August 29) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/statute-of-limitations-legal-research-71547

"Statute Of Limitations Legal Research" 29 August 2006. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/statute-of-limitations-legal-research-71547>

"Statute Of Limitations Legal Research", 29 August 2006, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/statute-of-limitations-legal-research-71547

Related Documents

Statute of Limitations for Fraud This refers to the maximum time legal action may be brought against someone for the commission of a fraud. This Statute depends on the jurisdiction. Most federal crimes in general have up to 5 years to prosecute. Capital offenses, however, have no Statutes of limitation. Federal frauds carry 10 years Statutes of limitation. These include frauds committed against banks and financial institutions and involving passports or citizenship.

This seems to be serious, but most of the people committing the crime are being released by the courts. (Understanding White Collar Crime) Question 3a: What is a FOIA request and is it likely to be granted? The request is under the Freedom of Information Act, and it is targeted to the United States Department of Justice, and there is no reason to think that the Department of Justice will refuse

(Chizek, 2003) The Role legal nurse consultant may provide service in a number of roles, including but not limited to: Consulting expert Testifying expert Facility-based investigator Trainer and in-service presenter Peer reviewer Quality improvement, risk management, claims management Liability insurance marketer and clinical resource" (Chizek, 2003) As standards of care constantly change, medical and nursing staff must keep informed of current standard to develop and/or modify policies and procedures, which must be maintained and secured indefinitely. In the

Attorneys, however, note that the suits are reflective of an increase in negligent doctors, who are hard pressed to serve a larger and more demanding patient load. Medical care is more costly and it is true that doctors fail to establish bedside relationships with their patients. Others point out that problems lie at the door of the insurance industry and management of hospitals (Committee, p. 1). Because we discovered the

Legal Issues With Do Not
PAGES 6 WORDS 1948

Analysis of Future Effects and How These Will Be Addressed Providing healthcare providers with the ethical training they need to make informed decisions during ethical dilemmas represents a useful starting point, but the exigencies of the human condition mean that people's desires change over time, but they will always need timely and accurate information about the alternatives that are available to them. People experiencing the rigors and stresses that are involved

Here, the Plaintiff and all of the members of the God Squad were arrested and removed from school property by police. The police acted on probable cause that the group was inciting violence on school property after observing their offensive and disruptive behavior. Additionally, the Plaintiff was given an arraignment, charged with trespassing, disturbing the peace, and inciting a riot, and was released on bail to the custody of his parents.