Philosophers and Great Leaders
Ancient Greek philosophers will always have a distinct place in human history by giving shape to Western philosophical thought (Fieser 2014). That philosophical thought moved away from myth to a method based on reason and evidence. Although these philosophers' ways of exploring the world were diverse, they nonetheless set the pace for a single search for the underlying principles of everything. The most influential among them were Socrates, Plato and Aristotle who focused more on the individual than the physical world (Fieser). Their philosophies are hereunder compared and contrasted with that of Alexander the Great, king of Macedonia.
The Philosophy of Socrates
Socrates was and still is better known for his unusual teaching methods than for his military career (Vlastos 1991, Waterfield 2009). He taught neither in a formal school nor required payment for his teaching services. He always debated against illogical reasoning and biases. Socrates opposed ascetism or achieving high spirituality or moral level through self-denial. He advocated a thorough enjoyment of life, instead. He also believed and taught that truth, beauty, and justice are objective phenomena and that man is born with an inherent understanding of these. Socrates thus taught his students to properly use what they already possessed. He also emphasized the importance of living a moral life, which brings happiness. He said that morality can be passed on through education (Vlastos, Waterfield).
The Philosophy of Plato
This underlies his more than 20 dialogues, philosophical letters and the rest of his writings, which were recovered only after the 14th and 15th centuries (Senyshyn 2008). In his Theory of Forms, Plato taught that the reality of physical and material things rests on a metaphysical reality of ideas, which in turn exists in an eternal world of Forms. His concept of an Absolute source of Good approximates the One-God deity of Christianity. For this, he was revived and recognized as the early precursor of the Christian doctrine when the Roman Empire was Christianized from 100-400 CE (Senyshyn).
The Philosophy of Aristotle
Aristotle founded his own school, which he called Lyceum, in Athens in the year 355 BCE (Crisp 2002). Alexander was already then king of Macedonia and became one of his students. Aristotle's works represented attempts to fuse pre-Socratic naturalism with Plato's metaphysical concept. But he eventually countered Plato's metaphysical interpretation of the world (Crisp).
Socrates taught that living a moral life brings happiness and Plato, on the other hand, introduced the concept of a Form, which is the Absolute source of good. Morality is the choice and practice of good and the rejection of evil. This ties the philosophies of the first two Greek philosophers. Aristotle's philosophy focuses on the chief end of everything or the highest good (Crisp 2002). That chief end, that highest good, must not be the means to any other but the really final one. All human pursuits or acts are mere means to further ends in a series. That very goal or end of all human pursuits is what is called happiness (Crisp).
For happiness to make sense, especially to those who are unfamiliar with ethics, it must be based on human nature and capable of being personally experienced (Crisp 2002). In comparison with Plato's notion of happiness as an abstraction that exists on its own, Aristotle views it as something human, practical and abounding in the very work and life of human beings. However, it cannot be shared with non-rational forms of life like vegetation and animals. Aristotle interprets true happiness as something that only rational beings are capable of experiencing. It can be experienced through a "perfect realization" and the activities of true souls and the self. And in this condition, happiness can be continuously experienced in a lifetime (Crisp).
Aristotle further cites the constitution of the human soul as vegetative and appetitive (Crisp 2002). The vegetative faculty is present in animals and necessary for physical survival and growth. The appetitive faculty is responsible for emotions and desires....
This faculty is both irrational and rational: irrational in that animals possess it too and rational because feelings and desires can be controlled by reason. That human capability to control unruly desires or emotions can become actions and these actions can form into a habit called a moral virtue. Aristotle calls that purely rational part of the human soul as the calculative faculty. It is that part, which contemplates, creates scientific principles, and "reasons logically." Their mastery is called intellectual virtue (Crisp).
Hand-in-hand, Aristotle teaches the doctrine of the mean (Crisp 2002). A moral virtue is the mean between extremes of too much and too little. Fear and rashness are examples of extremes and are both vices. The calculation of the mean is neither mathematical nor strict. The rational mind determines that mean according to the merits of the situation. Prudence, a virtue in itself, is required to establish the mean between extremes (Crisp).
The Philosophy of Alexander the Great
Alexander the Great is considered the greatest king of the world in history (Asirvatham 2014). He was not only the king of Macedonia and head of the Corinthian League and the conqueror of Persia. He was also the creator of the largest Western empire in his time. For all his fearless and peerless feats, achievements and conquests, he was elevated by the peoples of his time to the level of a god or a deity. Long after he died, Octavian Caesar paid tribute to his mummified remains, crowned it with a golden diadem and embellished it with flowers. He became the norm for victory. Napoleon himself described him as the ultimate commander of armies and set him up as his model. Generals used his courage and capabilities as the standard of military achievement (Asirvatham).
Alexander reached this peak of accomplishment and honor because he made Achilles his model and inspiration (Asirvatham 2014). He was said to have even perfected Achilles' god-ship and thereby achieved the level of a demigod. He thrived on Homeric military ideas, keeping a copy of the Iliad always with him. His imitation of Achilles led him to think and feel that nothing was impossible to him. But even the mightiest and most powerful ruler must confront his mortality. The "Greek Alexander Romance," published in the third century, presents a ruler who exhibits a new and unusual self-awareness and wisdom in meeting the Brahmans. The Brahmans warned him that there was nothing he could take from them because they bring only wisdom. Alexander turned humble and acknowledged his mortality, his subjection to the Sovereign will, and the impermanence of the physical world. At first, he told them that he would give anything they would ask. When they asked for immortality, Alexander said he had no such power, as he too was mortal. They seized the moment to ask why he waged so many wars, where he would take everything he had seized and that he had to leave what he had won behind for others. Then Alexander conceded that Providence had ordained that all men shall be slaves and servants to the divine will. He admitted to wanting to stop waging war yet something within him would not allow him to stop. He also declared that men may take things from others, but they must leave them behind because "no possession is permanent (Stoneman 1991 as qtd in Asirvatham)."
Argument and Counter-Argument
Happiness, not fleeting success or possession, is the only true and valid pursuit through a life of moral virtue. Socrates taught that living a moral life alone brings happiness. Plato concurs to One Absolute source of all good and happiness. And Aristotle speaks of happiness as possible only through the practice of moral virtue. Virtue results from the control of unruly desires and feelings out of a prudent determination of the mean between extremes. And Alexander acquiesced to the existence of Providence to whose will all men are slaves and subjects. He also accepted that even the most glorious human achievements are temporary and the mightiest and wealthiest men are mortal.
Counter-arguments -- Socrates once objected to asceticism or the belief in self-denial. He argued that individuals must enjoy life in an unbridled way. Plato also suggested that happiness is only a metaphysical concept.
Rebuttals -- Aristotle himself rebuts the counter-argument of Socrates against self-denial. Aristotle teaches that a prudent person chooses the mean between two extremes. In the process, he controls or denies unruly desires or feelings through reason. Therefore, self-denial quite often brings happiness rather than prevents it. And in reply to Plato's metaphysical concept of happiness, Aristotle argues that it should be within human nature itself and accessible to human experience to make sense and become practical. And that is through the habitual practice of virtue. Happiness, not fleeting success or possession, is the only true and valid pursuit through a life of moral virtue.
The three Greek philosophers are basically agreed that the good life is a moral life, or a life lived in the pursuit of righteousness. They…
Alexander saw himself as that philosopher-king who would install a new kind of cooperation and brotherhood with one or unified Greek culture, Hellenism, and speaking a common language, Greek (Smitha 1998). He intended that his subjects in the East would be reared and trained to become like the Greeks and Macedonians. In consolidating his huge territory, Alexander founded cities, mostly named Alexandria, in suitable and well-paved locations with sufficient supply
His lectures were a success as many eminent people of Edinburgh attended them and earned him a decent income. During the course of his lectures on English literature, Smith perhaps realized that his real vocation was economics. Hence, addition to English literature, he started to deliver lectures in economics in 1750-51 in which he advocated the doctrines of commercial liberty, based largely on the ideas of Hutcheson. It was also
In this Nature vs. Nurture essay example, we will offer topics, titles, an outline, and what it takes to make a great paper. We begin with a strong introduction and thesis statement, followed by body paragraphs that offer in depth analysis of the topics as well as current evidence. We end the essay with a succinct recap of everything under the conclusion section. In critical essays, the main thing to
" James a.S. McPeek further blames Jonson for this corruption: "No one can read this dainty song to Celia without feeling that Jonson is indecorous in putting it in the mouth of such a thoroughgoing scoundrel as Volpone." Shelburne asserts that the usual view of Jonson's use of the Catullan poem is distorted by an insufficient understanding of Catullus' carmina, which comes from critics' willingness to adhere to a conventional -- yet incorrect
Creation Myth Analysis Case Study of the History of Biblical Creation Narratives What Is Myth? What Is History? Manetho Josephus Jeroboam Is Genesis 1:1-2:4 Myth? Is Genesis 1:1-2:4 History? Is Genesis 1:1-2:4 Both Myth and History? An Analysis of the Biblical Creation Narrative of Genesis 1:1-25 and Egypt's Possible Influence on the Historical Record God created the world in just six days, and rested on the seventh, but scholars have not rested at all over the millennia in their investigation of
Roman view of Christianity Early Christianity did not develop in isolation, but within a complex landscape already occupied by belief systems, social networks, systems of identity, and political institutions, and it is essential not to regard it 'as somehow independent, as if the church were an entity existing apart from Christians living in particular times and places. Such a treatment neglects how the history of Christianity was influenced and shaped