Supply Chains Companies Have Been Term Paper

It is erroneous to look at technology in the context of supply chain management as the panacea; rather it needs to be seen as the enabler of efficiency and inter-supply chain collaboration, quality
management, and supplier relationship management. Technology is only
applied to supply chains after the fundamental relationships and trust have
been defined, along with a culture that is unique to the collaboration
within a given supply chain. The culture that has emanated from high
quality standards that Toyota has placed on suppliers and the development
of the Toyota supplier base as a learning organization over just
transaction partners. Toyota has rigorous standards for defining their
suppliers and use technology including many forms of online collaborative
applications to further support their quality and egalitarian approach to
managing their suppliers (D R Towill, et.al.). Toyota's best practices
focus on the selective use of technology to further support their strategic
objectives of enforcing very high quality standards, adherence to their
internal processes for performance and execution of supply chain functions,
and the ability of suppliers to create their own learning community.
Technology and its collaborative aspects are then used to strengthen the
trust and interdependent nature of the supply chain.
Studies have shown that that the higher the level of collaboration and
resulting trust, the higher the level of transaction velocity and accuracy
throughout a supply chain. The ability of technology to create this level
of transparency and trust through the use of collaborative tools including
portals, shared applications,...

...

The research completed by Mu-Chen Chen, Taho Yang, Hsin-Chia Li (pp. 524)
specifically illustrates this point. Technology is an enabler of
collaboration once trust has been created and maintained. These three
aspects of any supply chain are all predicated on how transparency and
trust are created and sustain, and the role of quality standards in
defining internal supplier performance and the clear benchmarks of
performance to manufacturers based on agreed-upon quality and overall
performance benchmarks.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Michael Burkett. "The "Perfect" Product Launch." Supply Chain Management
Review 1 Jul 2005: 12-13. ABI/INFORM Global. ProQuest. 1 Dec. 2007

Mike Ledyard, Bill Keough. "Demand-Driven Supply Chain Meets
Offshoring" Supply Chain Management Review 1 Jul 2007: 11. ABI/INFORM
Global. ProQuest. 1 Dec. 2007


Cite this Document:

"Supply Chains Companies Have Been" (2007, December 01) Retrieved April 16, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/supply-chains-companies-have-been-33797

"Supply Chains Companies Have Been" 01 December 2007. Web.16 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/supply-chains-companies-have-been-33797>

"Supply Chains Companies Have Been", 01 December 2007, Accessed.16 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/supply-chains-companies-have-been-33797

Related Documents

Supply Chain Companies focus on speed to market for a couple of reasons. There are first-mover advantages, and in some markets like smartphones there are a lot of consumers who are early adopters, so the market is strong for products that come to the market quickly (Smith, 1999). Companies can position themselves as innovators if they are consistently first to market with new ideas. Speed to market is also reflected in

Digital Supply Chain Companies that do not have good supply chain systems and processes often experience lower customer satisfaction levels, order lead times, and inefficient production processes vs. those that do. Before the widespread expansion of the Internet, most supply chains operated according to a very traditional and linear model -- business partners worked together directly with separately managed linkages between suppliers and customers. Today, the advent of the Internet has

Supply Chain Management Hypothesis defined Concepts of SCM and the evolution to its present day form Critical factors that affect SCM Trust Information sharing and Knowledge management Culture and Belief -- impact on SCM Global environment and Supply Chain management "Social" and "soft" parameter required for SCM Uncertainties This chapter aims to give an outline and scope of the study that will be undertaken in this work. The study lays out the issues faced by manufacturing organizations when it comes

This lack of trust within the supply chain has a rippling effect across the flow of goods and services, and should therefore be addressed with a high degree of priority. Trust must be built through a process of regular communication across the supply chain, which includes all parties involved in the flow of goods. Communication can be established by a variety of means. In addition to electronic communication, face-to-face communication

Supply Chain
PAGES 2 WORDS 636

Supply Chain There are several different attributes of supply chain management. Among them, some stand out as being more important than other. Key aspects of supply chain management include technology, communication/coordination, inventory control and bargaining power (EAUC, 2014). Bargaining power is important because it dictates the terms and conditions of the supply chain. If the buyer has more bargaining than the seller, then the terms will reflect more on the needs of

Results from the study by Petersen, Ragatz and Monczka show that effective collaborative planning depends on information quality, and the trust level firms share. The authors purport: "Collaborative planning activities between supply chain partners are expected to lead to better performing supply chains" (Petersen, Ragatz & Monczka, Introduction section ¶ 1). In addition, numerous other researchers have also explored the perception relating to supplier alliances, that enhanced collaborative planning