Suspects Have A Right To Be Silent Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
833
Cite

Miranda v. Arizona In the original case involving Miranda v. Arizona, 22-year-old Ernesto Miranda

stood accused of the rape of an 18-year-old female (and kidnapping and robbery).

The arrest happened on March 18, 1963. Miranda was arrested in his home and taken to a Phoenix police station, where he was interrogated and given a confession to sign -- which he did sign. On that confession, the police had typed in that Miranda fully understood his legal rights even though he was not notified that he had the right to remain silent (by not incriminating himself) and he had the right to legal counsel. Miranda was sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. This was an example of a heavy-handed strategy used by Phoenix police against a Latino man who was not fully mentally sound, according to the literature on the case.

Miranda v. Arizona -- the broader implications and the U.S. Supreme Court

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court heard an appeal from Miranda's attorney -- that his constitutional rights had been abused. And on June 13, 1966, the High Court made an historic ruling that is considered one of the most important decisions regarding justice in the history of the United States. The Court ruled that the 5th Amendment to the...

...

Hence, in legal situations (not necessarily arrests) a person on the spot can "Take the Fifth," or in other words, can refuse to speak to the issue in fear of self-incrimination (Shay, 2012). Also, the 6th Amendment ensures the right to a fair trial (i.e., due process) which Miranda clearly did not receive.
The Justices voted 5-4 in a ruling that Miranda's confession was "…not admissible evidence in the criminal trial" since the Phoenix police failed to inform him of his rights (Shay, p. 1). Interestingly, the High Court decided to hear three cases along with the Miranda ruling, since the other three cases involved similar circumstances.

In Vignera v. New York, the police in New York City arrested a suspect that was accused of robbing a dress shop. Shortly thereafter he was taken to a police station where he "…orally admitted to the robbery" and was officially placed under arrest (uscourts.gov). In Westover v. United States a suspect was arrested because he was suspected of being involved in a pair of robberies in the Kansas City area. After being interrogated twice by local police, then…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia. (2013). Miranda v. Arizona. Retrieved September 28,

2014, from http://www.cc.columbia.edu.

Shay, A. (2012). Tag Archive for 'Vignera v. New York.' Retrieved September 28, 2014,

From http://lcrm.lib.unc.edu.
US Courts. (2010). Facts and Case Summary. Retrieved September 28, 2014, from http://www.uscourts.gov.


Cite this Document:

"Suspects Have A Right To Be Silent" (2014, September 28) Retrieved April 27, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/suspects-have-a-right-to-be-silent-192169

"Suspects Have A Right To Be Silent" 28 September 2014. Web.27 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/suspects-have-a-right-to-be-silent-192169>

"Suspects Have A Right To Be Silent", 28 September 2014, Accessed.27 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/suspects-have-a-right-to-be-silent-192169

Related Documents

Miranda Rights Miranda THE PROS AND CONS OF THE MIRANDA RIGHTS Protection against self-incrimination is undoubtedly one of the most basic rights as described in the laws and codes of the American legal system. In the past, this right was often completely abridged, for those that were accused of a crime would be forced to confess their guilt through various forms of torture. But under American law, the protection against self-incrimination infers that

The convention entitles those who have not attained 18 years to special protection. State parties admitting those under the age of 18 into their national armed forces under voluntary recruitment must ensure that such recruitments are genuinely voluntary. Informed consent of the parents of such recruits has to be sought. Recruits have to be fully informed of their engagements in such military service. The protocol forbids armed groups that

When Miranda Rights Apply
PAGES 2 WORDS 838

Right to Counsel To whom it may concern, This memo serves to inform and educate on what is commonly known as the "right to counsel". Even if criminals caught red-handed are not the Constitutional scholars that they think they are, anyone accused of and/or arrested for a crime does have a right to counsel. Before getting into when the rights to counsel become guaranteed and enforceable, the rights themselves should be discussed

Civil Rights and Police Departments The outline for basic civil rights in America is deceptively simple and straightforward; it appears in the Bill of Rights, with a concentration on the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments. Taken together, these amendments govern the ability of the government to conduct searches and seizures, dictate the rules required for arrest, guarantee the right to remain silent, provide the right to an attorney, and prohibit

The idea of remaining silent when faced with accusation has historical religious and legal roots. Moses teachings', transformed to written form by the ancient Talmudic law had a complete ban on self-incrimination. The self-incrimination law could not be changed because it was viewed to contravene the natural instinct for survival. The ancient common law rule also had it that confusions must be voluntary. When the right to remain silent was

Criminal Defense, Constitutional Rights Arrest Constitutional Rights Before and After Arrest Constitutional Rights are essential when considering a person's relationship with the authorities before and after his or her arrest. These rights practically guarantee that the individual is presented with a fair treatment. There has been much controversy regarding Constitutional Rights in the recent years, as people became confused concerning the rights of suspected criminals and the government's interest to protect