¶ … synoptic problem" and explain how the 2-source theory provides a solution for it. Some of them obeyed but some did not. In terms of what this all means and reveals about Mark, it is noted by Oxford that Mark is less a historical account of Jesus and more about theological interpretation (Oxford).
The synoptic problem refers to the differences and similarities that exist between the synoptic gospels, those being the books of Matthew, Mark and Luke. While there are marked similarities between the three books, there are also very significant differences. The differences with John, the one gospel book that is not synoptic, are even starker. Thus, this is why it is not included with the other three gospels that form the synoptic trio. Anyhow, the two-source solution is a way to deal with the differences and similarities that exist between the books. As explained by the Blue Letter Bible website, the two-source theory is one of the more "widely accepted" solutions to conflicts that arise. They state that "it settles the problems that arise with Matthean priority, while confronting the difficulty of double tradition. The Blue Letter website states that the two-source theory uses Mark as the book of primacy. They state that both Matthew and Luke separately used Mark as a source. Further, Matthew reproduces a vast majority of the book of Mark and Luke does about half (BLB).
2. Explain the "messianic secret" in Marks's Gospel and what it serves for Marks's Christology.
The Oxford Biblical Studies Online website explains that the "Messianic secret" was a pattern of thought coined by William Wrede in 1901. It was noted by Wrede that Mark is quite unique as compared to the other gospels in that it there is some clarify about Jesus' self-realization about his status as a supreme being. Wrede noted that Mark reveals that Jesus told multiple ...
3. Compare and contrast the infancy narratives in Matthew and Luke in relation to each author's theology.
Also from an account on the Oxford website, the first two chapters of Matthew and Luke are in alignment. However, there are significant differences aside from that. Matthew makes mentioned of the Magi visit, the journey into Egypt, the great slaughter of the infants by Herod and all of that is told from Joseph's point-of-view. Luke, on the contrary, has accounts of the birth of John the Baptist, an angelic message delivered to Mary, the visit from the Shepherds, the circumcision of Jesus, the presentation in the Temple and a record of Jesus' conversation at the temple when he was a mere twelve years old (Oxford).
4. What theological insights do you discern in Matt 25:31-46
Of course, the relevant passage is about the Final Judgment. The NIV version talks about dividing people on the left and the right. The people, rather than being referred to people, are referred to as goats and sheep. The goats are those that are not of God and the sheep are the ones that are with God. There are two major insights that can be gleaned from these verses. First of all, it is an overall summary of what shall happen when final judgment comes to pass for all of us. Either we will be among the sheep and we will enter Christ's kingdom or we will be among the goats and we will instead be condemned to…
Some of them obeyed but some did not. In terms of what this all means and reveals about Mark, it is noted by Oxford that Mark is less a historical account of Jesus and more about theological interpretation (Oxford).
" For the more scholarly mind, however, such an interpretation might be less than entirely valid. What most critics appear to agree on when examining these principles is the fact that there must be some sort of literary interdependence among the Synoptic Gospels. The verbal agreement among the Gospels is one very strong indicator of such interdependence. Wallace regards both the independence theory and the Spirit Inspired hypothesis, generally held by laypeople,
Introduction While the Gospel of John bears some similarities to the Synoptic Gospels, as Barrett (1974) points out, it also sets itself apart in several unique ways by focusing on the mystical nature of Christ and the importance of the Church. Even the Synoptic Gospels offer differing details of the life and teachings of Christ, and in many instances, John agrees or is more in line with Mark, while Mark differs
Scholars have repeatedly stated that the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke are linked together by various similarities. As such, the three writings have been united under the entitlement Synoptic Gospels. The majority of literary investigations rely on equivalences in content, style, and order of events being similar and frequent in the Synoptic Gospels to such extend that they appear vastly separated from John's. Cursive analyses of the gospels have
John and the Synoptic Gospels Comparison of John and the Synoptic Gospels All Biblical text presents its own set of challenges in understanding and relating to modern day incidences. When examining the Bible, it is interesting to still see major differences that can complicate a modern interpretation of the Bible and Jesus' message. The major differences between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John show obvious differences that further complicate our
Much literary criticism assumes that the gospels are not necessarily historical or else it plays down theological or religious context. However, these assumptions are not inherent in the method; a well-crafted piece of historical writing also promotes certain ideological concerns in an artistic and aesthetically pleasing (Bloomberg)." Now that we have garnered a greater understanding of the climate of Israel at the time of Jesus Christ and the criticisms that
Bible Encountering John: The Gospel in Historical, Literary, and Theological Perspective provides a remarkably thorough explication of John's gospel from multiple perspectives and points-of-view. The book is divided into five main parts, in addition to the appendices, indexes, and study tools. Author Andreas J. Kostenberger formats Encountering John as a textbook, and yet the tome also serves as a reference book that complements exegetical works and Biblical commentaries. In the preface materials,