¶ … leadership, in particular the differences between tactical leadership and organizational leadership. Tactical leadership is focused on tactics and tends to be small scale in nature, flexible and decentralized. Organizational leadership tends to be more centralized, with a focus on resource deployment, logistics and support. Where tactical leadership is about what to do, organizational leaders ask how can we do something.
Tactical Leadership
The concept of tactical leadership reflects a concern for the immediate time frame. Tactics are developed primarily to serve the current interests, and tactical leaders seek to find ways to resolve problems. This leadership style is not particularly well-suited for long-range planning but can be useful in combat and other mission settings. One of the key traits and benefits of tactical leadership is that it is flexible. Tactical leaders are capable of constant adjustment to tactics on the fly, which is a valuable skill in a rapidly-changing environmental dynamic.
Because of its nature, the tactical leadership style is highly transactional in nature. Tactical leadership know how to map out a series of transactions that will allow them to meet their objectives. There may not be much sense of a bigger vision but the individual mission is accomplished well. In general, the tactical leader is oriented towards execution, and operational excellence as primary traits (Martin, 2011).
Tactical leadership excels in the nuts and bolts of a task. He or she can outline all of the different steps needed to complete a task, isolate the right individuals for each one, what resources are needed and what the timeframe...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now