Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Strengthening Others for Team Excellence
For a team to be successful in their activities, they need a strong leader who will bring the team together by ensuring the team members trust each other and look forward to achieving the goal of the team. According to Northouse (2012), the team leader is important and should exhibit traits such as intelligence, confidence, integrity, and determination. Kouzes and Posner (2012) also suggest similar qualities stating that the leader should be honest, inspiring, competent, and forward-looking. These scholars present different views of groups and teams dynamic, which form the subject matter of this paper.
Group dynamics and cohesiveness
According to Northouse (2012), a group's cohesiveness is promoted by the leader's qualities. The leader should be intelligent, as seen in their communication and problem-solving skills, excellent as seen in their synergy with the team and determined. Kouzes and Posner (2012) define competence as the most important trait to bring together a team. According to these two scholars, when the leader is competence, they are able to instill enthusiasm, energy and optimism in their followers making them cohesive. Northouse (2012), on the other hand, argues that the leader needs to inspire their team to be cohesive through their intelligent communication.
The similarities between the arguments by Northouse (2012) and Kouzes and Posner (2012) are clear yet also different on another level. Kouzes and Posner (2012) state that strategic planning and forecasting to see challenges and obstacles and mitigate them effectively is the key strength a team leader should have. Northouse (2012) also supports thus stating that a leader must act proactively through their interaction with the team. The scholars also agree that a leader should look beyond their self-interests and focus the team on the common interest.
Sharing the vision and team involvement
As argued by Ruef (2010), to lead a team effectively, the leader must align the team around the shared vision. The scholar states that the most important element of a leader is their ability to develop a common vision for their team members, which becomes their inspiration to follow. Alignment is important to make sure that the leader is not moving in one direction and the team...
In today's world, it is important for the team to persuade, inspire, and influence their team members towards developing individual goals that align with the overall team goal in order to get everyone aligned. The advantage of involving the team members in creating individual goals is that when the team members participate in goal setting, they feel greater ownership of the vision than when the leader develops the vision and goals on their own. On the contrary, this process can be time-consuming and haphazard. Thus the need for the team leader to get the teams to develop these goals in an energizing and productive session and he or she should be in charge of the process at all times.
The objective of the leader should be to gain the commitment of the team towards the shared vision. This commitment can be gained by getting all team members to contribute to the team's vision in one way or another so that it becomes a shared vision through the collaborative approach. The leader then provides direction for the team based on the agreed vision and team cohesiveness increases considerably.
Virtual and non-virtual teams
Virtual teams, as defined by Rad and Levin (2003), are the teams that are geographically distributed in different areas but share a common goal. Non-virtual teams, also referred to as collocated, conventional, traditional or face-to-face teams, are those teams that work together in physical proximity. Today's connected world has increased the popularity of virtual teams since more companies are embracing this way of working since it removes barriers and challenges such as traffic, relocation, etc.
One key similarity between virtual and tradition teams is that they share a common goal. No matter where the team members are located, they need to share a common goal since this is what brings them together. Another similarity is that the teams interact with each other through verbal and non-verbal communication to discuss and facilitate their work.
Virtual teams are fundamentally different from face-to-face teams. The first key difference is that defined by Cleaver (2001). Virtual teams are often characterized by demerits such as lack of emotion in…
References
Cleaver, J. (2001). A new team, better work, Chicago Tribune: Working, p. 1.
Cropanzana, R., Bowen, D.E., & Gilliland, S.W. (2007). The Management of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34-48. doi: 10.2307/27747410
Kouzes, J.M., & Posner, B.Z. (2012). The leadership challenge (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mathias Dewatripont, & Jean Tirole. (2005). Modes of Communication. Journal of Political Economy, 113(6), 1217-1238. doi: 10.1086/497999
Group dynamics: Working as a nurse-Midwife Working as a midwife requires me to function as a member of a team, not simply an individual nurse. The midwife must coordinate her advice with other components of the patient's obstetric treatment team. The midwife must also work well with the patient's family. Groups are often said to be either task-oriented or person-oriented (Group Dynamics 1 PowerPoint, Slide 8). In the case of the
Group Dynamics Discuss the functions of formal and informal groups. How does each contribute to the organization? with examples Formal groups are organizations that have a fixed set of rules, structure and have procedures that leave little room for interpretation, and must be followed. As well, they have status symbol, limit activities of individuals in the group, set objectives and policies and coordination between people. They have rules that are readily observable
The internal processes become more efficient because barriers in personal communication are broken down once the group is working towards the common purpose. Increasing cohesiveness in the group requires leadership that orients the objectives of group members more strongly towards the common purpose. This can be done a number of ways, including through individual and group task structure, the fostering of a common culture, the establishment of smooth communication
In a group situation, therefore, an emergent leader has an inherent power to be valued by a group of his or her peers. Rather than being viewed as superior, the leader's abilities are valued by other group members, with respect being earned rather than forced. As mentioned, communication is central to effective group functioning and leadership. Hence, a good group leader will also have a distinctive verbal style. Members who
Group dynamics in such an environment produce psychological and energy changes "fuelled by the underlying forces of motivation and anxiety"(Tyson, p.47). Stacey (1998) maintains that study of group dynamics in an educational setting is important because group interaction is seen as a "interaction is a "critical variable in learning and cognitive development" (1990 p.43 in Stacey, 1998, p.77) specifically in the "socio-emotional variables of group interaction, including motivation, satisfaction and
Adding conflict and competition to that precarious situation can be difficult, but is an important part of workplace group dynamics. However, conflict and competition can be both positive and negative components within a group dynamic situation. Jehn and Mannix (2001) discuss intragroup conflict and performance in their Academy of Management article, finding consistent results that implied the important nature of some conflict within workplace groups. The researchers found that