This is an important element, in reducing the overall amounts of collateral damage and casualties from these events.
How the Use of this Technology is Helping to Address Risk Management
The use of this technology will play an interconnected role in the larger disaster management plan that an organization will utilize. Where, it will consist of two parts to include: prevention and response. Prevention is when you are taking into account a number of different elements to limit the possible damages. This is when you are utilizing technology, as a part of the strategy to: assess the vulnerability of site and to provide back up support in the event of a disaster taking place. (Auserwald, 2005) During this phase of the disaster management plan, both GIS as well as CRG protocols can play a vital role in helping to: understand these weaknesses, address them and provide an effective solution in the event of disaster. When you compare and contrast this with government and private agencies, these tools help to prevent damage to property as well as mitigate any kind of casualties. Where, these they can be used to take a proactive approach in addressing the problem. In many ways one could argue, that this is the key to preventing manmade and natural disasters from spiraling out of control. (Auserwald, 2005)
Response is when you are reacting to the various events surrounding a disaster that has taken place. There a number of different elements that are taken into consideration as this part of the disaster management plan to include: rescue, relief and recovery. In this case, GIS and CRG technology can help to improve communication as well as coordination in the aftermath of these events. As they can help first responders to understand where they are needed the most and they help to more effectively assess damage. (Auserwald, 2005) at the same time, these tools will ensure that key data is provided in real time to different levels within the chain of command and there is sufficient communication. When you put these different elements together, this will help all entities to be able to address any areas of the disaster management plan through the use of these tools.
As you compare and contrast these different technology solutions to government as well as private agencies, it is clear they are providing an effective way of: assessing any kind of damage and quickly reaching those individuals who maybe injured. As it will help first responders along with the command structure to understand where these resources are needed most. At the same time, it helps to improve recovery efforts by ensuring that all data is protected and updated in real time (to reflect the changes that are occurring). This is significant, because it is highlighting how the use of this technology can help both governments and private organizations to be able to understand the overall nature of the threats they are facing. At which point, they can be prepared for them by addressing these issues and ensuring that the resources are sent where they are most needed.
Clearly, technology is helping both private organizations and governments to tackle a host of different threats from manmade as well as natural disasters. This is because the events surrounding September 11th and improvements in technology have forced organizations to begin utilizing such a strategy. Where, GIS and CRG protocols have been continually utilized on a regular basis. The reason why is because these tools can help any organization to effectively plan and understand the overall threats that they are facing. At the same time, it is ensuring that there are sufficient resources that are in place in the event that such incidents would occur. This is important, because it shows how these different tools can help to prevent possible disasters from occurring at specific locations. As the GIS technology can provide an effective solution for assessing the possible vulnerabilities and helping to coordinate resources / provide assessments in the aftermath of these events. While CRG technology, would be utilized to address the possible communications issues that could be faced in the aftermath of an event. It can also improve collaboration between: the public, first responders, government entities and the command structure of the operation. When you compare and contrast how these tools help to improve an organizations ability to respond to these events, it is obvious that they are seeking a proactive approach in dealing with the various challenges. This is significant, because it shows how the different tools can be utilized by both organizations, to prevent the possibility of the events taking place and limiting the amounts damage. If these objectives can be achieved, the odds improve dramatically that private agencies and governments can be able to effectively tackle these challenges. Once this occurs, it reduces the chances of manmade and natural disasters having an adverse effect upon a location.
Auserwald, P. (2005). The Challenge of Protecting Critical Infrastructure. (Dissertation). Retrieved from University of Pennsylvania. (0511)
Eden, B. (2005). 2D and 3D Information. American Library Association 41 (1). 18 --…