Logos Appeal In any scholastic argument, Aristotle's logos appeal would prove most advantageous and be the most sensible.

Arguments that base themselves on logos (known sometimes as logical appeals) entail proofs and assertions that confirm an individual's reasoning skills (Ethos, Pathos, and Logos ). Of Aristotle's three appeals, 'logos' appears to be the most scholastic; it forms a major part of all college-level writing assignments. In order to demonstrate that one has meticulously considered the topic under study, one should (Ethos, Pathos, and Logos ):

Carefully examine one's personal assumptions and find out if, under any conditions, those assumptions prove wrong. If this happens, one might have to consider not grounding one's claim on them.

Steer clear of flaws in logic.

Also, one must bear in mind not to presume that:

An event is the cause of another simply due to sequential ascension.

An individual's experience will be typical of the experiences of others (i.e., his experience will not be unique).

Only two alternatives exist.

Carefully phrase one's claims: only if there is no exception whatsoever, should one make assertions regarding "everywhere," "everyone" or "always." "

Support every personal claim using examples, quotations, or statistics.

Ensure that one's proofs accrue from duly recognized authorities...

New findings might dispute, add to or differ from some older ones.
Whenever appropriate, employ scientific or historical comparisons.

All of the aforementioned steps need to be adopted in scholastic arguments, because of three reasons. The crux of scholastic argument is facts (Arguments based on Facts and Reason-Logos). Authentic and accurate fact collection and transmission is what scholars as well as journalists must adhere to, strictly. Arguments that are grounded on truths and proofs are more preferable than arguments that solely work on reasoning. Also, human nature is inclined to believe claims which are measurable, countable, analyzable or perceivable, instead of claims defended solely by words (Arguments based on Facts and Reason-Logos).

Drawback

Aristotle, however, observes that in regular writing and speech, people typically employ what he terms as an 'enthymeme' or rhetorical 'syllogism', which represents an argument wherein some claims or evidences are unsaid and merely assumed and thus unsubstantiated. For instance, ordinarily no individual would believe the philosopher Socrates to be immortal. The common assumption would be that he would either be killed or die a natural death after growing old. Consequently, it can logically be inferred that: Socrates is human, thus, he…