Verified Document

The Role Attribution Theory Plays In How Perceptions About Others Are Formed In The Workplace Essay

Role Attribution Theory Plays in How Perceptions About Others Are Formed in the Workplace Anyone who has ever worked in an organizational setting can readily attest to the need to understand others in order to facilitate personal interactions and achieve optimal job performance. Attribution theory holds that people tend to develop perceptions about others based on their empirical observations which are then used, consciously or subconsciously, to form perceptions about their behaviors. In some ways, this process of applying attribution theory is intuitive and ongoing but there are some aspects of attribution theory that require explanation in order to better understand how and why people are motivated in this fashion. To this end, this paper reviews the relevant peer-reviewed and scholarly literature in order to evaluate the role attribution theory plays in how perceptions about others are formed in the workplace. Finally, a summary of the research and important findings about attribution theory are presented in the conclusion.

Review and Analysis

Introduced in the mid-1940s (Cabanis & Pyka, 2013) and refined in the late 1950s by Fritz Heider (Sirin & Villalobus, 2011), attribution theory has been the focus of a growing body of scholarship and some authorities argue that it has transcended the theoretical stage to become a legitimate field of study (Gaier, 2015). In sum, attribution theory maintains that people attempt to make sense out of the workplace by assigning causality to the behaviors of their coworkers, and such attributions tend to affect perceptions of their behaviors in the future (Zamani & Giaglis, 2015). Attribution theory is based on the so-called "theory of mind," a term that is used to describe the awareness humans have of the existence of minds in other people and how to explain and interpret their thought processes as well as their own (Herman, 2011).

There are two basic assumptions involved with attribution theory that account for this process as follows: (a) people want and need to make sense of their environment as well as themselves; and (b) people are motivated to better understand the reasons behind the behaviors of others as well as their own behaviors (Gaiter, 2015). In addition, attribution theory also includes the adaptational implications of these interpretations about the behaviors of other (Tasman & Kay, 2008). In most cases, people tend to apply attribution theory to observed behaviors by asking "Why?" and then developing the most logical answer as the reason (Chadee, 2011).

Interestingly, some authorities maintain that the tenets of attribution theory are operative irrespective of whether people are aware of it or not. In this regard, Christian (2009) reports that:

The fundamental attribution theory, greatly simplified, says that we tend to 'blame' someone's behavior on internal factors (their disposition, their personality) rather than external factors (their circumstances, the unique situation). This theory is among a handful of cognitive biases that affect our thinking whether we realize it or not. (p. 28)

The foregoing means that people tend to apply attribution theory in the workplace to account for the behaviors of others and to formulate perceptions concerning how they can reasonably be expected to behave in the future, especially under similar circumstances (Christian, 2009). Likewise, attribution theory holds that people tend to make these sorts of observations and interpretations in an effort to gain more control over their environment (Cagney, 2012).

Although all humans tend to apply the tenets of attribution theory to explain and understand the behaviors of others in the workplace, the process can have severe consequences when attribution errors are allowed to interfere with the accurate interpretation of observed behaviors, particularly when they are made by supervisors (Cagney, 2012). Conversely, employees may tend to explain and interpret the behaviors of their supervisors based on incomplete information in ways that detract from the quality of their relationships with them, further eroding employee morale and job performance. Therefore, it is vitally important to better understand just how automatically people tend to use attribution theory in an effort to make sense of their workplace environment and the limitations that the process entails.

A risk exists, though, that observed behaviors may be misinterpreted in ways that overlook the true motivation behind such behaviors. For example, someone might observe a co-worker unaccountably swerve his car in the parking lot and almost hit another vehicle and attribute this behavior to the co-worker being a poor or inattentive driver. What the observer did not see, though, was the stray dog n the parking lot that the co-worker swerved to avoid hitting (Christian, 2009). Similarly, a supervisor surreptitiously observes a subordinate appear to not be working because...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

What the supervisor did not know or understand, though, was that this subordinate was thinking about the best alternative available to recommend to the supervisor, a process that requires some serious thought. These types of misinterpreted observations are alternatively termed "attribution errors," "attribution asymmetry" and "self-serving biases" which, left unresolved, can adversely affect the ability of individuals to develop accurate perceptions about others in the workplace (Cabanis & Pyka, 2013). In addition, self-serving biases tend to compel people to misinterpret behaviors in ways that are favorable to themselves but are detrimental to those being observed (Farmer & Pecorino, 2010). For instance, an employee may observe a group of co-workers at a separate table in the company cafeteria casting glances her way and erroneously assume they are gossiping about her latest affair. The employee makes up her mind that she will somehow get even with each and every one of them and makes a mental note as to who was involved. What the employee did not realize at the time, though, was that her co-workers were planning a surprise birthday party for her. Similarly, employees may observe their supervisor leaving work an hour early every day and assume she is abusing her position of authority and become increasingly resentful as a result. What the employees did not realize was the supervisor had made arrangements to come in an hour early every day so she could leave an hour early in order to care for her elderly mother.
Such misinterpretations of observed behaviors are almost always due to incomplete information or erroneous assumptions (Cabanis & Pyka, 2013). In some cases, these types of attribution errors can be especially damaging when they are allowed to form the basis for performance evaluations or other positive career development opportunities. Because supervisors tend to subconsciously apply attribution theory to the behaviors of their subordinates, inaccurate or uninformed observations may also result in inaccurate performance evaluations or other career development decisions that can have life-altering outcomes (Cagney, 2012).

Indeed, the potential exists for supervisors to engage in discriminatory practices based on their misinterpretation of observed behaviors (Randle & Mathis, 2012). A good example of this potential is a supervisor who unconsciously devalues the contributions of an overweight worker due to misperceptions concerning the causation of the condition rather than the actual facts that are involved. Such misperceptions can negatively affect hiring decisions, promotions and layoffs irrespective of the worker's actual job performance (Randle & Mathis, 2012). In addition, race -- and gender-related stereotypical thinking can also result in attribution errors in the workplace (Bastounis & Minibas-Poussard, 2012). For example, a male supervisor may observe a female subordinate crying in the copier room, apparently out of frustration over being unable to operate such a complicated device as a Xerox machine without realizing she had just been informed about the death of her father on the telephone. Such attribution errors can likewise result in discrimination based on misinterpretations of observed behaviors that can adversely affect management decisions concerning performance evaluations or other career-development opportunities (Bastounis & Minibas-Poussard, 2012).

Similarly, it is also possible that such attribution errors can result in management decisions that positively affect employees. For example, a supervisor observes an employee's car in the parking lot each morning when she arrives, and assumes he is working extra hard to overcome his known shortcomings. What the supervisor did not realize, however, was that the employee was coming to work early each day to play World of Warcraft on the company's computer, a practice that frequently extended into normal business hours and was the proximate cause of the employee's poor performance. Likewise, an employee may be promoted ahead of her peers due to her supervisor observing her working through her lunch hour while the employee in question is really selling off company office equipment on Craig's List.

What these unwarranted and frequently undesirable outcomes share in common is the fundamental limitation of the human condition in accurately interpreting everything that is observed in the environment and making perfect sense of it. This is not to say, of course, that everyone misinterprets everything they observe, only that the process has its constraints that must be taken into account in order to better understand how and why people reach the decisions they do, an issue that assumes special importance in the workplace where people's livelihoods and careers are concerned. Certainly, everyone has their own…

Sources used in this document:
References

Bastounis, M. & Minibas-Poussard, J. (2012, March 15). Causal attributions of workplace gender equality, Just World Belief, and the self/other distinction. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 40(3), 433-439.

Cabanis, M. & Pyka, M. (2013, June). The precuneus and the insula in self-attributional processes. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(2), 330-335.

Cagney, T. (2012, July). Supervisor and manager training: Thinking outside the box. The Journal of Employee Assistance, 42(3), 37.

Chadee, D. (2011). Theories in social psychology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Attribution Theory
Words: 965 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Attribution Theory Human behavior is a complex process and the attribution theories try to explain it by discussing the psychological processes going on. It discusses the causes as well as effects of the particular behavior under consideration (Attribution Theory, n.d.). The Attribution theory also tries to explain if a person behaves in a certain way due to internal or external locus of control. The types of attribution theories are common sense,

Attribution Theories
Words: 697 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Attribution Theories In general terms, attribution theories are a person's psychological response to a conflict in an effort to explain the cause of the contention. While these theories may apply to any given situation, they are often closely intertwined with more intimate, interpersonal relationships. People in such relationships may attempt to explain their own actions or the actions of the other person in terms that may mitigate their own culpability. The

Attribution Theory
Words: 1328 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Attribution Theory Industrial organization Industrial organizational theory: The usefulness of attribution theory in a modern organization like Google Attribution theory Attribution theory attempts to explain how human beings attach meaning to their own behavior and the behavior of others. A presumption of the theory is that perception is not always reality. For example, an employee might perceive his or her boss to be aggressive or an employee might perceive all subordinates to be lazy. Attribution

Attribution Theory Juvenile Delinquency and
Words: 1565 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Proposal

The findings are expected to reveal interesting facts about the core motivations and external factors leading to juvenile delinquency. Parents and teachers will also be asked how they view their children, as well as suggestions on how the delinquency problem can be remedied. All the answers from all the interviews and questionnaires will be consolidated to form a statistical body of research. This will be analyzed in order to determine perceptions

Attribution Theory in General Terms,
Words: 1746 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Furthermore, the significance of this theory also extends to issues relating to health. This refers to the fact that the individual differences in attribution style and perception can lead to positive and negative implications for the individual. For example, "…differences in attributional style may lead to depression…and health problems with those who had a more pessimistic explanatory style. Baseball players with a pessimistic style died earlier than optimistic players (

Attribution Theory
Words: 2558 Length: 6 Document Type: Article Review

Attribution Theory Covered in the Readings Human beings are naturally an inquisitive set of species; they are always wondering how and why things occur. For this reason, they create sciences, philosophies and religions as approaches of answering their questions. For decades, this curiosity has influenced their personal, interpersonal, cultural and societal lives in intricate ways. Much of this is observed in our daily lives through our conversations and mindset interactions

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now