Reality Television Many reality television shows go from the ridiculous to the absurd, and that is an understatement. There are ample examples of mindless reality shows, including such inane shows like "Born in the Wild," about couples that want to experience the birthing experience in the great outdoors. This paper zeros in on a sociological view of reality television, including using symbolic interaction theory, functionalism, and conflict theory.

Symbolic Interaction and Reality Television

Symbolic interaction (or symbolic interactionism) delves into the meaning that people "develop and rely upon in the process of social interaction" (Crossman, 2012). In other words, people tend to behave in response to their own personal, subjective interpretation of how they perceive the world around them. The events, the interactions, and the behaviors that people witness and experience as they go through a day leave a subjective impression, according to Crossman, writing in about.com. What people believe to be true about something they see has far more truth for people than what is factual. Why do some people go crazy over reality TV while others aren't moved? My view is that simple people without much education or solid background latch on to reality TV because...

Their own world is narrow and boring, full of work and without excitement, so they gravitate towards something they subjectively see as interesting.
Moreover, the changing venues and behaviors witnessed on reality television help form that subjective lens through which some people perceive the world. In a voyeuristic reality television program, where the viewer is peering in on a private moment between two people, may give that viewer something to imitate. "Behavior deemed to be realistic in a TV program is more likely to be imitated than unrealistic behavior" (Coyne, et al., 2010).

Functionalism and Reality Television

The basis of functionalism is that a person can study and come to relate to the physical world in the same way as he can respond to the social world. Each part of society functions for the sake of stabilizing the whole society, according to Ashley Crossman. In other words, every part of society is supposed to function to support the "form and shape of society" (Crossman, 2012). Functionalism places emphasis on the "consensus and order" that society needs in order to function. Any one part of society that is dysfunctional negatively impacts the rest of society,…