Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Patriot Act
After the attacks on September 11, 2001, the government passed legislation designed to protect the country. Included amongst these was the Patriot Act which has become the center of debate by parties who are either in favor of or against the legislation. There are many provisions to this act and the ones that are most debated include: reducing certain limits on law enforcement, giving additional powers to the Secretary of the Treasury, and giving law enforcement the ability to arrest, detain, or deport any immigrants who are suspected of involvement with terrorism (Schulhofer 2005). After 9/11, America was in a frenzy of fear and patriotism which allowed laws to pass which have seriously infringed on the civil rights of citizens as well as allowing for unlawful activity to be performed by members of the government who claim they are doing it for the good of the country. In subsequent years, various senators and Congressmen have tried to distance themselves from the law, but when it was introduced, there was only one person, Senator Russ Feingold, who vocalized his disagreement while another, Patrick Leahy expressed concern but still voted with the rest of Congress in favor of the bill. Three of the most disturbing provisions of the Patriot Act include the provisions for security against terrorism, the surveillance procedures allowed, and removal of anything considered an obstacle to investigation.
The government asserted that the best way of preventing another 9/11 was by stauncher investigation and inquiry. By monitoring immigrants and questioning their conduct, it was promised that the government could glean all the necessary information...
Since the law was passed, there have been many instances where people have reported civil rights violations. For example, immigrants or visiting nationals have claimed they were arrested without due process. This is legal according to the Patriot Act which allows for both detaining and deporting immigrants without habeas corpus (de Londras 2011). "It states that an alien is deportable for contributing funds or material support to a terrorist organization -- or for contributing to any non-designated terrorist organization, if the alien knows or reasonably should have known that the funds or material support will further terrorist activity" (Ramasastry 2001). An individual who has immigrated legally to the U.S. can be deported if they have contributed to any type of terrorist organization, even if they did not know they were doing so or were forced to contribution through threat or violence. Hence, refugees can be subjected to deportation for corroborating with the terrorist regime that they escaped from.
It is the opinion of the U.S. government that 9/11 happened in part because they did not have the ability to identify who were threats to the safety of the citizens. To prevent any similar events in the future, the Department of Homeland Security was created with the specific goal of identifying and eliminating threats, often at the expense of civil rights (MacDonald 2003). Among other things, they are allowed to observe and monitor people to determine whether they are connected to terrorism. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network office of the treasury stated that the Patriot Act was designed to "deter and punish terrorist acts in…
Works Cited:
Baker, S. (2005). Patriot Debates: Experts Debate the U.S.A. Patriot Act. American Bar
Association.
De Londras, F. (2011). Detention in the 'War on Terror': Can Human Rights Fight Back?
Cambridge: Cambridge, UK.
MacDonald, H. (2003). Straight talk on homeland security. City Journal. Retrieved from http://www.city-journal.org/html/13_3_straight_talk.html
Patriot Act In response to the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, Congress passed the U.S.A. Patriot Act, an act that gives federal officials more authority to track and intercept communications, for both law enforcement and foreign intelligence gathering purposes (Doyle, 2002). The Patriot Act also gives the Secretary of the Treasury regulatory powers to prevent corruption of U.S. financial institutions for foreign money laundering purposes. The U.S.A. Patriot Act
Patriot Act The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act was passed soon after September 11. The groundbreaking legislation, which has caused tremendous controversy and outcry among civil rights activists, has become one of the most important pieces of legislation passed in Congress in recent American history. The U.S.A. Patriot Act contains previsions included in previous anti-terrorist bills, including one
Patriot Act: Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Increases the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement Agencies The Patriot Act which was signed as law by President George W. Bush on October 27, 2001 reads like a wish list of the law enforcing agencies. It was long-standing complaint of the law enforcers that the provisions contained in the Bill of Rights such as the "due process" of the Fourth Amendment constrained them in their investigations of suspected
It is, in one sense, a give and take relationship, but underlying it are the philosophies of Rousseau and Smith, in spite of the fact that both are full of contradictions. Rousseau, for example, states that man's "first law is to provide for his own preservation, his first cares are those which he owes to himself; and, as soon as he reaches years of discretion, he is the sole
PATRIOT ACT V. FOURTH AMENDMENT Patriot Act & 4th Amendment The Fourth Amendment was created in 1791 primarily to end the existence of general warrants, which the American colonialists hated and feared. These warrants were used by the English government to conduct door-to-door searches and mass arrests, often as a coercive method for achieving social and political goals (Maclin and Mirabella, 2011, p. 1052). With this history in mind the text of
" Prohibiting "a bill of attainder" means that the U.S. Congress cannot pass a law that considers individual or aggregation blameworthy and later discipline them. Disallowing an ex post facto law implies that the U.S. Congress cannot make any given act a crime after the time the act had been committed. It is doubtful that this applies to a few sections of the Patriot Act. Individuals who monitor the Supreme