There have even been reports that have mentioned that this theory is just an "account of crime not a clarification," (Cassell, 2005). The Victim's Right Act of 2004 has been able tom defend those that fall up under this theory because those that committed these crimes are producing victims that will need protection. While these issues have been pointed out, there is no doubt that the Routine Activity Theory works when used to explain why crime is more prevalent for certain groups, as well as why certain types of crime occur more often.
In terms of strategy suggestion that comes along with the Routine Activity Theory, many have made the suggestion that if one merely decreases the three issues, they will be capable to decrease crime. This would not have much effect on the Victim's Right Act of 2004 because the less crime the less victims and if there are no victims than there is no one that will need to be protected up under the law (Michael, 2007). Studies show in this theory that when there is an increase in guardianship in addition to time spent at home really doe bring down the chance to actually get out there and start committing crime. However, accomplishing this by means of can be very hard. It is not really likely to order how much time an individual spends time away from their house. The Attempts to really start encouraging kids to stay home throughout what is considered to be the prime criminal hours have comprised making a restriction for people that have not reached the age of 18.
Victim's Right Act of 2004 has little impact when procedures are met in order to keep crime down. One of these measures that are being used are after school programs for kids which are to provide safety alternatives where children are provided openings for their hostility, for example playing games like midnight basketball. Places like the Ministry of Children and Youth Services have also made some suggestions in increasing "the confidence, harshness and speed (speed) of legal authorizations," (Ontario), with the intention of increasing discouragement of youth from committing any type of crime. Victim's...
This law does send out a message letting them know that victims will not just take crime lying down but they do have right. Of course this does not mean that crime will decease because people are aware of the Victim's Right Act of 2004.
In conclusion, Routine Activity Theory certainly can be utilized by explaining why crimes do occur, and also give a prediction of who has the uppermost probability of doing crimes based on the three requirements mentioned earlier; an offender that is willing, a target, in addition to the shortage of appropriate guardians. However, the Victim's Right Act of 2004 does appear to have some impact on the theory. It is clear that the less crime that is going on means the less the act will need to be used. Committing the crime. However, using the Routine Activity Theory, we can effectively create programs that make it more difficult not only for people to commit crime but also make them less easy to victimize. Victim's Right Act of 2004 nevertheless does appear to be an act that is successful in helping its victims.
