South Vietnam, it believed, could be a base for the desired ability to mount military and economic operations throughout the globe and regardless of the insidious presence of communist influence, a premise which stood in direct contrast to Ho Chi Minh's dream.
Indeed, as an official policy, leaders in Washington considered that the fall of South Vietnam to communism would be a pathway to the prevalence of communism in other venues, such as Cambodia, Laos and even France, where the ideological movement was very robust amongst student movements. As stated a U.S. Department of State representative during the period in between the first and second Indochina wars, "the recognition by the Kremlin of Ho Chi Minh's communist movement in Indochina comes as a surprise. The Soviet acknowledgment of this movement should remove any illusions as to the 'nationalist' nature of Ho Chi Minh's aims and reveals Ho in his true colors as the mortal enemy of native independence in Indochina."
As point of fact, Ho had ingratiated himself to the support of Russia and China in so extreme a manner as to validate this concern, exchanging supportive propaganda in his own nation in exchange for tactical girding. This would reflect the key decisions made in Hanoi inducing the heightened conflict as it would exist in the period between 1964 and 1968.
The United States would attend to its motives by continuing the training and arming of South Vietnamese soldiers. At the juncture that a proxy war was waged through native forces on both sides, the United States and the Soviet Union would resist dirtying their hands with combat action for another five years. Nonetheless, outright civil war was now a product directly resultant of the divisive imperialism originating in Washington D.C. And bouncing back through a defiant and Soviet-supported leadership in Hanoi.
After a 1964 attack in the Gulf of Tonkin sunk an American warship, the conflict reached a breaking point. Declaring full-scale war on North Vietnam and the NLF, the Johnson administration engaged a policy that was divided between ground forces and air strikes. Beginning in 1965, Johnson oriented the fight in Vietnam with Operation Rolling Thunder. This campaign was girded by Johnson's Rules of Engagement (ROE), also initiated that year as something of a warning regarding the mounting intensity of confrontation with the expansive Soviet Union. Here, Phan (1992) reports that "the restrictive ROEs reflected the administration concern that provocative military activities in the region would trigger a confrontation with the Soviet Union or China. Under the intense political pressure from the U.S. home front to reduce American involvement, Operation Rolling Thunder was gradually de-escalated and came to an end in November 1968. Rolling Thunder failed not only because the coercive campaign was poorly planned and executed but, fundamentally, because North Vietnam was immune to conventional coercion due to its applied revolutionary warfare."
These were lessons which would eventually become clearer to the administration of President Nixon. When the Johnson administration withdrew from its air campaign strategy, it was perceived by the North as a concession. Operating on the pretense that it had broken the American will to defend its nation-building interests in the South, the NVN gradually broke off peace negotiations in Paris and heightened its employment of guerrilla tactics in the South. In 1972, with talks at a stalemate and the United States enjoying little progress in the war while simultaneously suffering a diminishing support at home, the North Vietnamese saw the opportunity to emerge with a full victory. In March, the NVN abandoned guerilla tactics in favor of a conventional invasion of important southern infrastructural points. This would be known as the Easter Offensive, and would mark the end of the American interest or ability to continue its war and occupation in Vietnam.
And consideration that the United States might continue to support its overall goals in Vietnam at least through aid to the South Vietnamese forces that it had propped up for a decade would ultimately be fully dismissed when "in 1975, Congress refused President Gerald Ford's last-minute request to increase aid to South Vietnam by $300 million, just weeks before it fell to communist control. Few legislators had taken the request seriously; many conservative Republicans and hawkish Democrats agreed by then that Vietnam was lost and that the expenditure would have been a waste."
At this juncture, the government which the United States had left to support itself in South Vietnam was toppled and the nation existed under a single, communist flag. Vietnam's 'victory' passed only the major criterion of dispatching a foreign enemy from its soil with its governmental self-determination intact. But for the toll levied on its...
In the same year that it would reunite its own nation, the Communist party would likewise instate communist leadership in Laos. And by 1979, it would also overthrow the Khmer Rouge government in Cambodia for its gross mismanagement of the civilian population. In these regards, Ho Chi Minh would truly facilitate the unification of his region under a shared banner of communist rule. That said, some objective scrutiny is relevant when praising the success of Ho Chi Minh's ambitions.
For Vietnam, it accomplishments during the war would foster a false sense of confidence. Torn by decades of war, both civil and insurgent, the Communist government would immediately find itself faced with the difficulties inherent in its ideologies. A compelling embodiment of Southeast Asia in the relatively brief time which has passed since its century of subjugation is one offered in 1990 by a top communist advisor Tran Bach Dang, he recalled an "old Chinese adage: 'you can conquer a country from horseback, but you cannot govern it from horseback.'
Though the resistance formulated by a shared communist ideology converged with a vehement sense of nationalism to enable the Vietnamese to dispatch the United States, they were yet unable to adapt these philosophies as functional governmental policies. Initial indications were that Vietnam's prospects for reconstruction would be arduous, costly and afflicted by obstacles.
And for the first twenty years, this was very much this case. Such was a situation in no small way effected by the economic isolation which had been a consequence of its deeply damaged relationship with the United States. Even as Ho Chi Minh emerged victorious in his primary aims of independence, reunification and communist governance, Vietnam would nonetheless suffer the repercussions of crossing the Western Superpower. The waning Soviet economy and the warming of relations between the United States and China did not augur well for Southeast Asia which remained closed to western relations for many years following its 'victory.' It would not be until Vietnam underwent considerable reforms to its own governmental structure that genuine progress would begin to emerge throughout the region. In 1992, a reevaluation of its constitution would provoke the communist republic to open its doors to global capitalism.
By 1995, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia were granted normalized trade status with the United States. This would mark a turning point in the post-war era, bringing each of these nations into contact with the world economy. Today, Vietnam is one of the fastest growing venues for production and technology outsourcing for the west. This is, in many ways, helping to finally heal the scars of America's attempts at subjugating the Vietnamese.
Interestingly, as it increasingly becomes a recognized participant in the world's economy, Vietnam also increasingly has come to identify with the Western values which it fought so valiantly to deflect. Its interest in participating in the spoils of free trade, for example, indicate that the presence of western values would be important in helping the nation to achieve its own identity in the modern era.
For the whole of Southeast Asia, the arrival of French colonialists would begin an era of cultural, political and economic dominance that would give the Vietnamese access to rising principles of a socialist conceit then becoming extremely pronounced in France. The last-ditch effort by the United States to prevent the realization of this fervor would enable it the opportunity to exercise such a philosophy. And as the region gradually becomes a more pertinent and concurrently self-directed part of the world community, the ways in which these experiences have profoundly shaped it become ever more apparent. In its proud determination to define its own destiny and its simultaneous ambition to be an engaged part of the world community, Vietnam today is both a consequence of Ho Chi Minh's dream and a sharp rebuke of the principles which underscored this dream.
Allen, D. & Long, N.V. (1991). Coming to Terms: Indochina, the United States, and the War. Westview…
Gender, in some ways may determine the difference of the narrative arc in these two memoirs. A male, Tang fought for the cause militarily, while Elliot married an American and traced her associations with the war through her family roots, rather than through her own political involvement alone. Tang shows the war in all of its brutality largely from his own perspective and the perspective of other fighters, while Elliot
Vietnam War A majority of the American wars have had obvious starting points like the capture of Fort Sumter in 1861, the battles of Lexington and Concord in 1775, the attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, and the invasion of North Korea into South Korea in June 1950. However, for the war in Vietnam, there is no fixed beginning. The United States got into that war incrementally via a series of
" You figure, Williams explained to the author, you don't like what's happening at home in Chicago, and now in the U.S. Marines "...you finally get a chance to get away." Those were Williams' reasons for joining the military and participating in the Vietnam War as an African-American youth. Indeed Williams saw the military as not just an escape, but as "a form of incarceration" - but the war might
United States military has helped in the attempt to establish self-sufficient countries. Its primary mission in this regard has been to defend the inhabitants of particular countries, such as Vietnam in the 1960s, and more recently Afghanistan. Conflicts between countries have usually focused on resources and politics.mmHowever, perceived disparities between the allocation of resources and political power has often inspitred insurgents. Examples of such occastions are the Vietnam War
Ho Chi Minh was highly educated and attended various universities around the world according to the literature from numerous sources including the Eastern Worker's University and Lenin School in Moscow. He was trained in Moscow involving revolutionary tactics (Columbia Encyclopedia 2008). Minh had a strong desire to make Vietnam an independent country and spent his whole life in pursuit of this dream. In southern China, Minh trained the exiles in techniques
Causes, Course, and Consequences of the Vietnam War against the USA As the world’s superpower, the United States got involved in the Vietnam War but left the country with a mortifying conquest, appallingly high fatalities, the public in America cuttingly divided, and the leaders unsure of the way forward regarding foreign policy. The Vietnam War is in history as American’s most protracted and enervating war that the country ever lost and