Research Paper Doctorate 860 words

Whistleblowing in organizational contexts and legal frameworks

Last reviewed: March 28, 2004 ~5 min read

Whistleblowing

Businesses today are faced with a number of challenges, and one of the biggest is unethical or illegal practices by their employees. It is important to examine why whistleblowing should be encouraged to prevent irreparable damage to the company.

Understanding Whistleblowing

Whistleblowing is defined as "an exposure of fraud and abuse by an employee. This is a straightforward enough definition, but one involving complex issues. For the intending whistleblower, the decision to expose illegal or unethical practices within his or her organization carries it own pitfalls (Gurmeet)."

Conflicts

There are conflicts an employee may face such as "loyalties-personal, organizational, and social, which may be a collision more than he or she is willing to bear (Gurmeet)." The employee may also worry about retaliation from the company, and view it as "David and Goliath, where the little guy confronts the mighty company (Gurmeet)."

Risks and Moral Obligations

While there are several avenues a whistleblower may benefit from in terms of defense, "whistleblowing is still seen as a solitary act that puts the whistleblower at risk in both his job and future prospects and places him in the dilemma of having to make an individual sacrifice with no hope for recompense, all for the greater good that, in the end, might do him no good at all (Gurmeet)."

Many people feel they are "law-abiding citizens who know right from wrong and always act accordingly (Timms)." However, the world is becoming increasingly complicated, smudging the lines of black and white to grey.

Many people know deep down what is morally right, but the fear of reprisal allows them to convince themselves that they may be misunderstanding the corruption, and that the organization is acting within the law, both ethically and legally.

Examples of Whistleblowing

There are some people who have taken risks in order to do the morally correct thing, and blow the whistle on corruption. Some of these include: "Enron employees Sherron Watkins and Maureen Castaneda who blew the whistle on dubious company practices. Initially they were ignored, then ridiculed and threatened with sack before bringing the giant corporation to it knees, and Harry Templeton, who stood up to the might and wrath of Robert Maxwell by revealing the newspaper tycoon's abuse of workers' pension funds (Timms)."

Whistleblower Protection

Due to the risks and fears faced by potential whistleblowers, there have been statutes enacted in all 50 states as a means to "expose, deter, and curtail wrongdoing. Policymakers' recognition of whistleblowing's potential effectiveness as a mechanism by which to expose wrongdoing has become increasingly widespread in the last fifteen to twenty years. The benefits and drawbacks of the federal False Claims Act have received a great deal of attention on a national scale such as: initiatives aimed at encouraging whistleblowing being pursued by the states, and numerous courts interpreting pertinent federal and states statutes (Dworkin)."

Federal Level

There are two types of legislation concerning whistleblowing offered at the federal level. One is "aimed at encouraging whistleblowing through incentives, while the other is focused on protection against retaliation (Dworkin)." The most commonly used statutes concentrate on "providing a cause of action for whistleblowers who experience job-related retaliation as a consequence of their revelations (Dworkin)."

False Claims Act

In 1986, the federal False Claims Act (FCA) was revised. It is "one of a small handful or relevant laws that provide financial incentives for disclosure, and has become one of the prime whistleblowing laws, as well as the most demonstrably effective (Dworkin)." Since the revision, the number of FCA reports of "fraud against the government have increased from an average of six per year, to over 450 per year. The Act, which provides substantial rewards to whistleblowers who prosecute successful suits in the name of the government against individuals or companies who have fraudulently claimed federal funds, has made millionaires of most successful FCA whistleblowers and resulted in the recovery of more than $3 billion (Dworkin)."

You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2004). Whistleblowing in organizational contexts and legal frameworks. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/whistleblowing-businesses-today-are-faced-165261

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.