Social injustice encompasses all evils, which may include discrimination, gender bias, racial profiling, and many others. Social injustice, which comes in many forms, is a global problem (Stewart et al., 2012). Based on discrimination; this involves the favoritism of a given group over another. Racial profiling is self-explanatory, and it involves separating people owing to their skin color. This is prevalent in the developed countries, and this helps in developing the theme of this paper. Social injustice, is an entity of the ancient, but unfortunately, some of the actions in the 21st century, still have strains of the past (Gains, 1986).
It is in racial profiling where one can find a group of people having substantial privileges when compared to a minority group (Branscombe, Schmitt, & Schiffhauer, 2007). Racial profiling has resulted to cases of unequal privileges among the whites and blacks. In all cases, the whites receive more privileges when compared to the blacks. This qualifies as a social injustice because there is unequal access to resources (Todd, McConnell & Suffrin, 2014). Giving the whites more privilege does not enhance transformation of the society; it rather has resulted to the disparity among the involved (Solomon et al., 2005).
There have been considerable efforts in trying to raise awareness about racial profiling to reduce racial profiling. One of the strategies employed is the use of diversity courses in school or learning institutions (Case, 2007). Another strategy was the prejudice reduction technique, which strives to enhance awareness on illegitimate advantages (Stewart et al., 2012). A typical example of the illegitimate privilege was the law concerning citizenship. The law forbids people to apply for citizenship, unless the person was white (Halley, Eshleman & Vijaya, 2011). In addition, white privilege involved the accruing of advantages by respect of the nose shapes, culture, and language, which are some of the characteristics of the whites.
These strategies worked well to raise awareness among the white students; however, they did less to change the attitude they had concerned race and ethnicity (Stewart et al., 2012). One of the reasons the strategies failed is due to the lack of comprehensiveness. This means that it lacks to identify the type of attitudes, which represent components of racism, and it failed to portray a healthy white racial outlook (Ponterotto, 2009). Therefore, white privilege as a social injustice has raised considerable attention. This has resulted to substantial studies about it, especially in psychology, education and social science literature (Leonardo, 2004). The main concern is that white privilege is enhancing evil in the society, and in the entire world.
In a study conducted by Leonardo (2004), some white students felt that the white people have the ultimate power in the United States. Apparently, racial discrimination, in the form of white privilege, is common in the most developed countries. In addition, the attitudes of the whites enhance this injustice, which has made its way to other parts of the world. Therefore, racial profiling in this form is a significant problem, putting in mind that it will always result to discrimination based on the skin color. Nonetheless, it is wrong to provide a majority group of people with illegitimate privileges (Stewart et al., 2012), and failing to give minority groups the right to the same privileges.
White individuals may perpetuate racist behaviors, and it is likely that some of them will not be aware of the acts. Scholars, who attempted to understand racism, critically examined the relations between race, social, economic and political power, from the whites perspective. In such a way, the scholars were able to acquire information on the way the whites expose advantages to their fellow white in an effort to make success easier for them, and subsequently disadvantage other people based on color (Halley, Eshleman, & Vijaya, 2011). This raises concern because the era of colonialism, and prejudice, including slave trade was over, but the strain is now rooted in another form (Ponterotto, 2009).
Although this is not enough, institutions, especially learning institutions, are in the process of constructing white racial identities, which has socialized the whites to imagine their world in manners that favor their positions in the same (Solomon et al., 2005). Therefore, this is a significant problem because it means that whites will continue favoring their own, and make it easy for their fellow whites, at the expense of other people based on color. It also means that in most developed countries, the chances of success for people of other color will never exist. It makes it evident that without special privilege, people such as African-Americans will stay unemployed, and white privilege will be natural (Solomon et al., 2005).
Significance of the Study
Prior studies on white privilege make it apparent that the issue exists. Alternatively, the many investigators, from various fields such as education, psychology and social science, shows that white privilege is a complicated phenomenon (Leonardo, 2004). This also shows that white privilege is a substantial social problem, which needs elimination. This is why some of the prior scholars, through investigation, attempted to provide frameworks to solve the problem (Stewart et al., 2012; Case, 2007; and Branscombe, Schmitt, & Schiffhauer, 2007). However, the issue of white privilege still exists because the strategies failed to achieve the objectives. This has also contributed to further studies on the same.
What makes this issue essential is the irony expressed by the "co-founders" of the constitution. The whites, popularly referred to as "founding fathers" drafted the constitution, in which, they advocated for equality among human beings (Leonardo, 2004). This is because they believed that God created people equal; however, slavery, patriarchal acts, and now white privilege, is far much in contrast with the prior concept of "equal human beings (Leonardo, 2004)." Therefore, this raises concern, and the society must be aware of the actions that are in contrast with the transformation of society. This makes the subject of "white privilege" essential as subsequent studies can result to the realization of a solution on the same.
There are substantial scholars who have contributed to the development of theories that try to address the issue of white privilege. They managed to do so through conducting empirical studies. Other scholars have conducted studies, which have amounted to substantial information on the same. This only means there is a large volume of literature online and offline that can help in understanding the issue of white privilege. Empirical studies have helped other experts, such as psychologists to develop models, which aim to understand why the whites tend to favor their fellow whites at the expense of other people.
Therefore, this paper relies on prior literature in an aim to provide information on white privilege. The studies, which this paper borrows, are empirical. In addition, this methodology is appropriate because it will review existing literature, and evidence in an attempt to provide succinct information. Therefore, the study will be reliable, in the sense that it will increase awareness concerning white privilege, racism, and support for a pro-active action. Alternatively, this methodology will examine all strategies, which prior studies suggest as effective in reducing white privilege, to learn their value, and offer recommendations on white privilege.
Historically, being white was almost the best thing a person could have, after surety of eternal life. This is in reference to some historical narratives as described by Leonardo (2004). In addition, being white was equal to having money in one's pocket without their awareness. With such descriptions, it is conclusive that white privilege was dominant. This description also helps one imagine the presentation of unearned privileges that whites, by virtue of their color and race, had over the other people. This also translates to the roles played by the whites in taking wealth or resources to people who do not share in their color, globally (Leonardo, 2004). Although this is the case, since time immemorial, the whites, on the other hand, do not readily accept that benefits they enjoy doing do not come from privilege (Branscombe, Schmitt, & Schiffhauer, 2007). This shows that whites will always deny their involvement with favoring, or taking away resources from other people, who lack the capacity to defend themselves.
Whites perceive themselves as better when compared to other minorities based on wealth and social status. Therefore, it is hard for them to accept that white privilege exists. The above is a way of justifying their acts. In atrial to determine the perceptions of whites in regards to white privilege, Leonardo (2004) found out that whites felt they had privileges. The whites had more privileges when compared to other races. In respect to the same trial, whites revealed that they never had white disadvantage thoughts (Leonardo, 2004). The advocacy of liberalism is another way that whites have contributed to alienation of minority groups (Solomon et al., 2005). In such a case, whites have continuously failed to name color, and suggested "they see people." This notion contributes to further disparity, and although the whites engage, and reinforce…