Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Federal Taxation of Partnerships and S-Corporations
As the title of the 2014 article “Why Use a Partnership Instead Of An S-Corp?” suggests, one of the primary criteria in selecting one particular entity type over another is the question of tax liability. In contrast to a C-corporation, in the case of a partnership or S-corporation, the income of the entity is not taxed; rather the partners and shareholders are taxed at standard rates. Income is not taxed at the entity level. It passes through to partners and shareholders and is taxed though them at their individual, personal tax rates. Of course, this raises the question of why become a C-corporation in the first place. But for very large entities, the benefits of legal fictional personhood are great, given that means that shareholders are not responsible for any debts or other legal liabilities generated by the C-corporation. In contrast, an S-corporation exists as an entity for federal tax purposes (“Why Use a Partnership Instead Of An S-Corp,” 2014).
Although they share some similar features, partnerships and S-corporations also share some critical differences. Partnerships function very much like sole proprietorships. They are very simple to set up, legally speaking. For a small business...
Yet the partners are also legally liable for the debts of the partnership, because there is no separation between the entity and the joint proprietors. On the other hand there is no risk of double taxation of the partners’ incomes and profits derived from the corporation.
Another advantage of a partnership is that any individual can be a partner and there are no limits upon the number of partners. In contrast, given that an S-corporation is designed to limit the scope and size of an incorporated entity, to make it distinct from the large, publically-traded C-corporation, there is a limit of 100 shareholders for S-corporations. S-corporations, unlike C-corporations, are also only permitted to issue one class of stock (“Why Use a Partnership Instead Of An S-Corp,” 2014). The ability of an S-corporation to generate revenue is thus more limited than that of a C-corporation. A partnership is likewise prohibited from selling shares to raise stock, although it is permitted to have different types of partners with different percentages of interest in the partnership (“Why Use a Partnership Instead Of An S-Corp,” 2014). This can, to…
References
Why use a partnership instead of an S-Corp? (2014). Dulin, Ward & DeWald. Retrieved from: https://dwdcpa.com/blog/why-use-a-partnership-instead-of-an-s-corp
corporation is a regular corporation that opts to tax its profits at the personal income tax level. An S corporation must prepare and file an income tax return, but itself pays no tax (if it complies with all of the technical and complex rules of the Federal law). Each shareholder pays taxes on his/her share of S. corporate income on his or her individual tax return. Owner-employees of an
Tax Managing the S Corporation Built-in Gains Tax Basically there are two types of relatively large corporations that exist in the American corporate system. C corporations were first introduced and they are a type of business that exists as a separate entity from its owners and is taxed as such. This is done so that the owners can deflect certain types of liability from themselves to the corporation itself. The owners
However, liability is limited to the corporation and offers owners' limited personal liability, which is something that is not found in a sole proprietorship or partnership (Corporation: Definition, Formation, Maintenance, 2012). Furthermore, a corporation is also considered to be a stand-alone entity that has separate tax liabilities; as such, the corporation is responsible for paying corporate taxes on any of the profits the company makes, however, each employee is
("Definition of a Corporation") A fourth advantage of a corporation is that it is easy to raise various forms of financing. The structure of corporation allows it to be owned by large numbers of individual (shareholders). This is significant, because it means that a corporation can use the public markets to be able to raise investment capital. As a result, some corporations have the potential to raise billions of dollars
Strategic Management at McDonald's McDonald's Strategic Management Strategic Management at McDonald's Strategic Management at McDonald's McDonald's: Introduction Organizational Structure and Corporate Governance Industry Sector Analysis Michael Porter's Five Forces Model Key conditions in the External Operating Environment of McDonald's and its Industry The Value Proposition on McDonald's Products Financial Performance SWOT Analysis for McDonald's TOWS Matrix for Alternative Strategies BCG Growth Share Matrix for McDonald's Marketing, Financial, and Research & Development Strategies McDonald's Leadership Joint Ventures, Strategic Alliances, and Partnerships Performance Measurement Methods and Benchmarks Recommendations References Table of Contents Sr.
Navistar International Corporation, formerly known as International Harvester Company, is a U.S. based holding company that owns the manufacturer of International brand commercial trucks. It is located in Warrenville, Illinois, with about 500 employees and revenues of almost $10 billion. Through a network of about 1,000 dealer outlets in North and South/Central America, and more than 90 global countries, it sells parts and contracts for services for large truck machinery.