This paper compares and contrasts the American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics and the American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) Code of Ethics. It examines their foundational purposes, areas of agreement, and key differences across topics including client welfare, confidentiality, fees, termination, technology, and research and publication. The analysis demonstrates that while the two codes share many practical standards, their divergences stem primarily from their differing orientations — the ACA's secular, client-centered focus versus the AACC's explicitly faith-based mission centered on Christian values and moral conduct.
This essay compares and contrasts the American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics and the American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) Code of Ethics. It reviews their general similarities and differences, and discusses specific comparisons with respect to fees, termination, and research and publication.
The two codes differ significantly in their basic purpose, and this fundamental difference shapes how various topics are treated throughout both documents. The ACA's primary concern is "to respect the dignity and to promote the welfare of its clients" (ACA Code of Ethics, 2005, p. 4), while the AACC describes its primary goal as bringing "honor to Jesus Christ and his church, promote excellence in Christian counseling, and bring unity to Christian counselors" (Ohlschlager, 2004, p. 3).
With respect to similarities, both codes place a high priority on doing no harm. They each prohibit sexual relationships with clients, former clients, and their partners. The ACA imposes a five-year waiting period following the last professional contact, while the AACC allows for marriage after only two years following the conclusion of the counseling relationship. Both codes also advocate for informed consent and the maintenance of client confidentiality, and both encourage counselors to engage in pro bono work.
The ACA and AACC both discuss the importance of maintaining good professional relationships, and they set similar standards for supervision, training, and teaching. Their standards for research and publication are comparable as well, with the notable exception that the AACC explicitly discourages the use of ghostwriters.
Technology is another area of difference between the two codes. The ACA devotes an entire section to technology applications, while the AACC mentions the topic as being in development. Additionally, the AACC provides guidelines for lay helpers and non-ordained ministers; the ACA uses neither category but does have similar guidelines for supervisees.
A significant difference between the two codes concerns the AACC's treatment of what it considers to be immoral behaviors. The AACC provides a detailed list of client behaviors that AACC counselors must refuse to condone, including substance abuse, abortion, divorce, premarital and extramarital sex, homosexuality, transgender behavior, and euthanasia. Conversely, the ACA instructs counselors to be "aware of their own values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors and avoid imposing values that are inconsistent with counseling goals" (ACA Code of Ethics, 2005, p. 5).
"Fee-setting, barter rules, and ability to pay"
"Guidelines for ending counseling and client referral"
"Shared research ethics and secular vs. pastoral summary"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.