This paper reviews three policy documents published by the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI), examining their stances on government funding through school vouchers, employment and conflict resolution, and health issues related to HIV-positive students. The author evaluates ACSI's support for tax credits and vouchers, arguing that diverting public funds to parochial schools deepens inequities and raises church-state concerns. The review of ACSI's employment guidance finds merit in its community-based, conciliatory approach to school conflict. The final section critiques ACSI's HIV/AIDS enrollment guidelines as alarmist, arguing they risk fostering fear rather than informed, safe classroom practices.
School funding in general, and particularly the government funding of private and parochial schools, is one of the most controversial issues in education today. Unsurprisingly, the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI) strongly supports the use of government tax credits or vouchers to allow students to attend parochial rather than public schools. The organization argues that this approach aligns with the American value of choice and improves educational quality through competition.
However, diverting funds from a struggling public school system will provide an answer for only a few private or parochial school students — not a broader solution to the problem of underfunded or inadequate American schools, particularly in urban areas. The more money is diverted from public schools and funneled to private or parochial institutions from finite public educational funds, the less public schools will have available to improve their infrastructure and academic quality. As public schools deteriorate, the incentive for parents to remove their children grows, creating a cycle that further weakens the public system.
Would this outcome be so harmful? Yes. First, the amount of a voucher would only cover the per-pupil expenditure in public school, meaning it would not fund most private academies — it would primarily cover tuition at the small Christian academies promoted by the ACSI. Furthermore, the legal issue of separation between church and state becomes problematic. Even if vouchers are granted in a nondiscriminatory fashion to all students, the ACSI supports exempting voucher-funded schools from any nondiscrimination requirements regarding faculty and students. In short, if a Christian school required a religious commitment as a condition for teaching or enrollment, that school would still be indirectly funded by the government through vouchers, raising serious constitutional concerns.
"ACSI's Matthew 18 principle for school conflict"
"Review of ACSI's alarmist HIV enrollment guidelines"
It is unsafe to be in a classroom environment of fear, just as it is dangerous to be in a classroom environment riddled with disease. Teachers must educate students not to fear HIV transmission, and to protect themselves by learning how HIV is actually spread, rather than viewing one another as potentially tainted and fearing all physical contact. It is far more likely that a student will catch the common cold from a classmate's bodily fluids than HIV. Catching a cold is, in truth, a far more realistic daily health concern for most teachers and students than HIV infection, and school health policy should reflect that reality.
You’re 46% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.