This annotated bibliography examines six contemporary peer-reviewed studies on addiction treatment and counseling interventions. Sources cover a range of evidence-based approaches including brief motivational phone interventions for college students, audit methods for studying treatment access disparities, group motivational interviewing for youth offenders, the moderating role of social networks in treatment-seeking behavior, ecologically-based treatment for homeless mothers with substance use disorders, and 12-step facilitation therapy outcomes. Each annotation summarizes the study's methodology, participant population, and key findings, providing an overview of current research on effective addiction treatment strategies across diverse populations.
Borsani et al. (2014) conducted a study of college students mandated to attend an alcohol program after being cited for alcohol-related violations on campus. Participants were randomized to receive either a brief motivational phone intervention or assessment only. The results demonstrated that the brief motivational phone intervention produced significant reductions in alcohol-related problems compared to the assessment-only control group. This research suggests that remote, time-limited interventions can be effective for addressing substance use issues in college populations.
Beau et al. (2013) examined audit methods as an emerging approach for studying disparities in access to substance use treatment services. The audit study design involved trained individuals posing as patients seeking treatment, with specific characteristics varied across conditions to enable researchers to isolate and manipulate variables. The findings indicated that audit design represents a viable method for examining whether significant barriers to voluntary treatment access exist. This methodological contribution addresses a critical gap in understanding systemic obstacles to treatment initiation.
D'Amico et al. (2013) evaluated the potential of group motivational interviewing (MI) interventions to prevent future negative life impacts among youth at risk for substance use. The study involved court-involved youth randomly assigned to one of three conditions: Free Talk, usual care, or group MI intervention. The researchers examined intervention feasibility, client acceptance, and preliminary treatment outcomes. Results showed that both MI and Free Talk conditions resulted in decreased use of alcohol and drugs, suggesting that structured interventions in justice settings can support positive behavioral change.
Mowbray (2014) investigated the role of social networks in the relationship between alcohol consumption and treatment-seeking behavior. Many individuals delay seeking treatment until their alcohol problems become severe. Using logistic regression analysis to examine the interaction between alcohol consumption, social networks, and treatment utilization among 1,433 individuals with lifetime alcohol dependence, Mowbray found that social networks moderate this relationship. These findings suggest that interventions aimed at strengthening social connections and support systems may facilitate earlier engagement with treatment services.
Slesnick (2013) conducted a randomized pilot study examining the efficacy of ecologically-based treatment for substance-abusing mothers experiencing homelessness who were caring for young children. The study recruited 60 mothers with children ages two to six years from a homeless shelter and randomly assigned them to either treatment as usual or Ecologically-Based Treatment. The intervention group received three months of rental and utility assistance supplemented by case management and substance abuse counseling services. Results indicated that two-thirds of mothers in the treatment group experienced faster declines in alcohol use and achieved greater housing stability compared to the control group. This research demonstrates the importance of addressing material needs alongside clinical treatment in vulnerable populations.
"Higher 12-step exposure correlates with improved abstinence and reduced drug use"
You’re 74% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.