Age-Graded Social Control Theory and the King Brothers Case
This paper applies Sampson and Laub's Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control to the case of Alex and Derek King, who murdered their father at ages 12 and 13 in 2001. The paper outlines the theory's core premises — that social bonds formed through marriage, employment, and military service can redirect criminal trajectories across the life course — and traces its origins in the Gluecks' longitudinal research. It then describes the King brothers' crime, legal proceedings, and eventual release before analyzing how the theory's concepts of desistance, turning points, and informal social control help explain the brothers' post-incarceration efforts to reintegrate into society.
- Introduction to the Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control: Core premises of Laub and Sampson's life-course theory
- Theorists and Year of Theory Formulation: Origins and authorship of the 1993 theory
- Premise and Origins of the Theory: Glueck data and turning points in adult life
- The King Brothers: Offenders and Their Crime: Details of the 2001 patricide and legal proceedings
- Applying the Theory to the King Brothers' Actions and Desistance: Theory applied to brothers' reintegration and desistance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its case analysis in a clearly explained theoretical framework before applying it, giving readers the conceptual vocabulary needed to follow the argument.
- It integrates both the quantitative foundations of Laub and Sampson's work (Glueck longitudinal data) and the qualitative dimension (life narratives), reflecting the theory's own dual methodology.
- Direct quotations from the offenders themselves (Derek and Alex King) are used as evidence, lending the analysis an empirical grounding beyond secondary sources alone.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates theory application: it presents an established criminological framework in full, then systematically maps its key concepts — turning points, social bonds, desistance as process rather than event — onto a specific real-world case. This structure shows how theoretical constructs gain explanatory power when tested against empirical particulars.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a summary of the Age-Graded Theory's core claims and findings, proceeds to identify its authors and publication context, then traces its empirical origins in the Glueck data. A factual account of the King brothers' crime and legal proceedings follows, and the paper concludes by applying the theory's concepts directly to the brothers' post-release behavior and prospects for desistance.
Introduction to the Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control
One basic premise of the Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control is that, while experiences of childhood and personality traits are vital to comprehending behavioral stability, experiences during adolescence and adulthood can redirect criminal paths either more negatively or more positively. Laub and Sampson found, in particular, that marital relationships and employment stability were key factors in adult criminal change. As the strength of familial and workplace bonds increased, deviance and criminality decreased — both in the non-delinquent control group and among known criminals. Laub and Sampson also examined the ability of qualitative narratives to facilitate a more individual-centered, life-course examination. According to them, life-history narratives, together with quantitative techniques, may be used to create a richer and more complete picture of why certain adult males continue to perpetrate crime while others desist. Narratives help unpack the mechanisms linking important life events across the life course, particularly situational context and personal choice. Life history gives voice to what broad statistical data and the social sciences often cannot capture (Doherty, 2005).
While initially counterintuitive, Laub and Sampson concluded that their data confirmed that the justification of a criminal lifestyle and continued offending are virtually one and the same. With regard to desistance, criminal life histories and narratives revealed that offenders desist through a combination of individual agency and structural and situational influences associated with major social institutions that facilitate sustained desistance. Desistance is not an event but a process that must be continually renewed. This premise highlights the necessity of examining individual motivations alongside their social contexts. Desistance processes operate simultaneously at multiple levels and across diverse contextual settings, and do not arise merely from individual predisposition or aging (Sampson & Laub, 2004).
Laub and Sampson's analysis also revealed a difference between individual criminal paths and the cumulative age-crime curve, corroborating a key assumption of criminal career theory. A salient feature of their findings is the heterogeneity of adult criminal behavior. The theorists showed that criminal activity decreases as an offender ages, even among active offenders. Moreover, desistance trajectories are not prospectively identifiable on the basis of individual differences or typological accounts rooted in childhood. Although childhood projections are reasonably accurate for forecasting relative crime levels among offenders into their twenties, discrete categories that remain valid across the entire life course cannot be established (Sampson & Laub, 2004).
Theorists and Year of Theory Formulation
Laub and Sampson introduced the Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control in 1993 in their book Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. The authors argue that strong social bonds arising from key life events predict offenders' desistance from crime in adulthood. The decade following publication witnessed a growth of studies corroborating this broad finding (Doherty, 2005).
Premise and Origins of the Theory
Laub and Sampson developed their Age-Graded model by drawing on some of the most compelling data in criminology. During the 1940s, Eleanor and Sheldon Glueck conducted a longitudinal study of troubled teenage boys in Boston who had already broken the law and were attending reform school. The researchers gathered comprehensive information on the boys, observing them carefully through their teenage years. This research was largely ignored until Laub and Sampson discovered it in a Harvard Library archive. The two scholars reconstructed the Gluecks' data and followed up with the original study subjects, who had by then reached their late fifties. Some subjects — the troubled Boston boys — remained lawbreakers into adulthood, while others led entirely ordinary lives with no further legal issues (Wright, 2008).
Laub and Sampson's explanation drew on life-course developmental principles. They found that problematic children who were redirected in adulthood experienced a turning point — some life circumstance or event such as marriage, stable employment, or military service — that transformed them from delinquents into responsible, law-abiding citizens. Military service brought discipline and structure into the boys' lives, while marriage and employment brought stability and a motivation to remain on the straight path. The significance of the Age-Graded model lies in its integration of psychological inclinations with the effects of family, employment, and other social factors on crime. This socio-psychological approach to criminology incorporates some of the strongest elements of both sociological and psychological perspectives: it allows for individual differences in the propensity to commit crime while also recognizing that society can suppress or counteract those tendencies. The model offers hope that troubled children may eventually experience a life-changing turning point — the right relationship or the right job (Wright, 2008).
References
Celizic, M. (2009, August 9). Brothers who killed father: "There is still hope." Today News.
DailyMail. (2013, October 9). Brothers who murdered their father in 2001 when they were just 12 and 13 talk about their attempts to move on with their lives. Mail Online UK.
Doherty, E. E. (2005). Assessing an age-graded theory of informal social control. Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change matters to the study of crime. Criminology, 31(3), 301–325.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Harvard University Press.
Power, J. (2003). Speculation on the King Brothers case.
Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (2004). A general age-graded theory of crime. In Testing integrated developmental/life course theories of offending.
Tasgin, S. (2012). Assessing an age-graded theory of informal social control. Criminal Justice, 17.
Wright, B. (2008, December 1). Sampson and Laub's age-graded life-course theory of crime. Everyday Sociology Blog.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.