History and Purpose of the American Prison System
This paper examines the development of the American prison system from its early history through the modern era. It traces incarceration trends from the 1920s onward, including racial disparities in imprisonment rates, the rise and fall of prison labor, and the emergence of informal inmate social codes. The paper discusses the "Great Penitentiary Rivalry" between New York's congregate system and Pennsylvania's individual system, analyzing how these competing models shaped contemporary corrections. It also addresses the ongoing debate between publicly funded and privately funded prisons, exploring questions of cost, performance, and government scope. The paper concludes by noting that the system's core purposes—societal protection and inmate rehabilitation—continue to define American corrections policy.
- Introduction: Overview of American prison system scale and purpose
- History and Purpose of the American Prison System: Incarceration trends, racial disparities, and prison labor
- The Great Penitentiary Rivalry: New York vs. Pennsylvania competing prison models
- Publicly Funded and Privately Funded Prisons: Debate over privatizing the American prison system
- Conclusion: Synthesis of prison system history and purpose
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper provides a clear chronological framework, tracing the American prison system from the 1920s through contemporary privatization debates, giving readers a logical progression through a complex topic.
- It contextualizes key developments—such as racial disparities in incarceration and the abolition of prison labor—within broader social and legislative history, adding analytical depth beyond simple description.
- The contrast between the New York congregate system and the Pennsylvania individual system is used effectively to illustrate how ideological rivalry shaped institutional design.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative analysis as a primary organizational strategy. By placing the Pennsylvania and New York prison models side by side, and later contrasting publicly and privately funded prisons, the author shows how comparison can reveal the trade-offs inherent in policy choices. This technique allows the paper to move beyond narrating facts toward evaluating competing approaches.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a thematic introduction establishing the scope and scale of the American prison system. It then moves into a historical overview covering incarceration trends and early prison conditions. The third section narrows to the pivotal 19th-century rivalry between two competing prison models. The fourth section shifts to a contemporary policy debate on public versus private prison funding. A brief conclusion synthesizes the paper's main points and restates the prison system's core purposes.
Introduction
The American prison system has throughout the years developed to become home to an ever-increasing population of the nation's criminals. This growth is due in part to the fact that incarceration has consistently been used even in cases where alternative punishment would be adequate. Furthermore, the growing inmate population reflects sentence disparities that include both unusually long and unusually short terms. Currently, the maintenance of prisoners in American prisons is funded entirely by taxpayers. The American prison system has become the largest in the world, with the number of inmates increasing annually. While the purpose of American prisons is to serve as a place of punishment for criminals, they have in many respects become places of relative comfort — indeed, it is widely argued that inmates in American prisons are treated more like guests at a resort than like convicted criminals.
References
Greene, J. (n.d.). Comparing private and public prison services and programs in Minnesota: Findings from prisoner interviews. Retrieved April 6, 2011, from
Pray, R. T. (n.d.). How did our prisons get that way? Retrieved April 6, 2011, from
"Prisons: History — Modern Prisons." (n.d.). Jrank.org: Law Library — American Law and Legal Information. Retrieved April 6, 2011, from http://law.jrank.org/pages/1782/Prisons-History-Modern-prisons.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.