Canada's Conservative "Tough on Crime" Approach: A Critique
This paper examines Canada's Conservative Government's "tough on crime" approach, focusing on sentencing reforms such as the Conditional Sentencing Reform Bill and increased incarceration periods. Drawing primarily on Colin Goff's Criminal Justice in Canada, the paper argues that harsher penalties fail to address the root causes of criminal behavior and instead inflate prison populations without reducing crime. It draws parallels to the United States' experience with mass incarceration and contends that effective crime reduction requires education and proactive prevention rather than punitive deterrence alone. The paper ultimately calls for a systemic shift toward rehabilitative and educational strategies.
- Introduction: The Conservative Tough on Crime Agenda: Overview of Conservative Government's punitive crime philosophy
- Sentencing Reform and Conditional Release Restrictions: Conditional Sentencing Reform Bill and parole restrictions
- Why Punitive Policies Fall Short: Goff's critique: root causes ignored by harsher penalties
- Mass Incarceration and Lessons from the United States: U.S. prison population as cautionary example for Canada
- Education and Prevention as Effective Alternatives: Case for education-based crime deterrence over punishment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds its critique in a specific legislative example — the Conditional Sentencing Reform Bill — giving the argument concrete policy footing rather than remaining purely abstract.
- It draws a productive cross-national comparison with the United States' mass incarceration experience, strengthening the argument through real-world analogy.
- The paper maintains a consistent evaluative thread: each paragraph ties back to the central claim that punitive deterrence is insufficient without addressing root causes.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates policy critique through comparative analysis. By juxtaposing the Conservative Government's intentions with both theoretical arguments (from Goff) and empirical outcomes (U.S. incarceration rates), the student shows how a policy can be evaluated against its stated goals and against the evidence of similar approaches elsewhere. This technique — setting up a policy's internal logic and then dismantling it with evidence — is a foundational skill in criminology and public policy writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by describing the Conservative Government's punitive philosophy and its flagship legislation. It then shifts to a critique sourced from Goff's textbook, explaining why harsher penalties fail. A middle section addresses the unintended consequence of prison population growth, followed by the U.S. comparison. The paper closes with a normative argument for education-based prevention as a superior alternative, ending on a call for systemic reform.
Introduction: The Conservative Tough on Crime Agenda
The Conservative Government in Canada emphasized its attitudes toward crime by implementing a system designed both to deter and to harshly punish criminals, with the stated aim of making the country a safer place. Child sex offenders, for instance, became less likely to receive mild sentences, and authorities were generally instructed to do everything in their power to prevent serious crimes from occurring. As a result, penalties became more significant and the public was encouraged to play a more active role in protecting the community.
This punitive orientation drew on the longstanding assumption that the prospect of severe consequences would cause potential offenders to reconsider their actions. By raising the perceived risks associated with criminal behavior, the government believed it could achieve measurable reductions in crime across Canada. Understanding the logic behind these reforms — and their limitations — is essential to evaluating the direction of criminal justice policy in Canada during this period.
Works Cited
Alvi, S. Youth Criminal Justice Policy in Canada: A Critical Introduction. Springer Science & Business Media, 2 Feb. 2012.
Goff, C. H. Criminal Justice in Canada. Nelson Education Limited, 2007.
Kury, H., and E. Shea. Punitivity: International Developments, Volume 3. Brockmeyer Verlag, 2011.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.