Andrew Johnson's Impeachment Trial and Reconstruction Era
This paper examines Andrew Johnson's presidency during the Reconstruction era following the Civil War, focusing on his conflict with radical Republicans in Congress and his historic 1868 impeachment trial. The paper traces Johnson's effort to continue Abraham Lincoln's conciliatory approach toward the defeated South, the legislative clash over Reconstruction policy, and the specific charges brought against him — chiefly his removal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton in violation of the Tenure of Office Act. It concludes by assessing the significance of Johnson's one-vote Senate acquittal and its lasting implications for the balance of executive and legislative power in American government.
- Introduction: Johnson's role in post-Civil War Reconstruction
- Johnson's Political Background and Rise to Prominence: Johnson's Democratic roots, Union stance, and congressional conflict
- The Impeachment Charges of 1868: Eleven articles and the Tenure of Office Act violation
- The Trial and Its Outcome: Trial timeline, acquittal by one vote
- Conclusion: Historical significance of Johnson's impeachment trial
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper provides a clear chronological narrative, moving logically from Johnson's political background through the impeachment charges to the trial's outcome, making it easy to follow.
- It situates the impeachment within a broader constitutional debate — the struggle between executive and legislative authority — giving the event historical significance beyond a simple political conflict.
- The paper uses specific dates, vote counts, and legislative details (e.g., the Tenure of Office Act, its 1887 repeal) to ground its argument in verifiable historical fact.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of contextualizing a single historical event within a larger political framework. Rather than treating the impeachment as an isolated incident, the author connects it to Reconstruction policy disputes, the legacy of Lincoln's presidency, and the long-term constitutional question of presidential removal power — showing how one event can illuminate broader institutional dynamics.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief character sketch of Andrew Johnson before establishing his political context and the source of conflict with Congress. It then narrows focus to the specific impeachment charges, details the trial timeline and result, and closes with a short conclusion that reflects on the trial's historical significance. This funnel structure — moving from broad context to specific event to lasting meaning — is well suited to short historical essays.
Introduction
Andrew Johnson served as a central figure in what marked the start of renewal in America. His courageous and often blunt Tennessean character showed Congress who he was when he took up Abraham Lincoln's plans after the president's assassination, in order to reconstruct a nation. He knew of Lincoln's previous struggles with the extremists in Congress and tried to continue Lincoln's aim for reconstruction in a charitable and constitutional manner. However, because of Johnson's fiery temperament, the Reconstruction period took a turbulent turn — with Senator Edmund G. Ross ultimately casting the decisive vote that saved Johnson's presidency.
Johnson's Political Background and Rise to Prominence
Andrew Johnson was a lifelong Democrat and former slave owner who gained a place alongside Abraham Lincoln on the 1864 Republican ticket in order to win the support of pro-war Democrats. Johnson was fiercely pro-Union and had come to national prominence when, as a Senator from the pivotal border state of Tennessee, he denounced secession as "treason" (Law2.umkc.edu, 2015). His impeachment stands as a notable event in American political history that historians continue to examine, owing to Johnson's struggle with firm congressional opposition and the trial's sensational outcome.
Johnson, resolute in carrying out Lincoln's conciliatory plans toward the defeated South, was forced to contend with the more radical Republican leaders in Congress. These leaders pursued a harsher administration of the subjugated Southern states, treating them as conquered provinces that had forfeited their rights under the Constitution. What began as a conflict of policy interest transformed into a broader struggle between Legislative and Executive authority — an impeachment battle fought over Reconstruction policies that lasted for years and culminated in a single-vote difference.
The Impeachment Charges of 1868
Johnson faced impeachment on February 24, 1868. He was charged with eleven articles of impeachment detailing his alleged misdemeanors and "high crimes," as debated in the U.S. House of Representatives. The primary charge against Johnson was a perceived violation of the Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress the previous year. More specifically, the House objected to Johnson's removal of Edwin M. Stanton, the Secretary of War, from office. Johnson not only dismissed Stanton but subsequently replaced him with Union General Ulysses S. Grant.
Conclusion
Andrew Johnson was the first president to undertake the reconstruction of the United States following the American Civil War. Determined to carry out Lincoln's vision of unification and national transformation, Johnson faced stubborn opposition and an impeachment trial the country would not see repeated for more than one hundred years. Although the trial ended in his favor, it highlighted the turbulent nature of American politics and the profound effect that the contest for power can have on the governance of a nation.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.